Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say! The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts


I had an interesting conversation with a couple of friends about the threat of digital intrusions. How far will you let the perception of convenience justify your personal vulnerability? Is it too much work to care about how corporations are using the data we trade for access to their latest time saving / consuming application or service?

Does it require to much of our bandwidth to actually go back and limit personal access?

Maybe it's easier to believe that there isn’t possibly anything in your life that they will find interesting.

Are they looking for interesting? Are they seeking anything in particular? What if they are only harvesting data points to sell or lease them? Or they could be building a digital avatar of you that gains definition with every input.

These are all important questions that I fear too few of us are asking.


Checking the box
Another aspect, of the business of data, is that what they are harvesting now could be used for something different later. That is the problem with the evolving culture of privacy policies. They are so difficult to understand that we mostly forgo reading them. When was the last time you agreed to what was in the privacy policy? Let me put this another way. When you check the box, are you agreeing to the privacy policy, or are you agreeing that you want the perceived benefits of the service, which you cannot access unless you check the box?

Privacy policies change and we have to update our agreement with them. When they do, what has changed? Why? What is the difference between the new agreement and the old one? Do we even know?


This comes up again for me after reading a Global News article about the explosion of DNA collection and testing. We buy the sales pitch because deep down we all want to know who we are and where we come from. We are curious about the genetic material, the code, that makes each one of us our beautiful unique selves.


Collecting points
Think of each privacy policy you sign as a data set. Each set is harvesting in real time data points. It might be a collection of markers from your mobile phone’s health or habit application. Or it is the purchase history of your credit card. Throw in your web search and browser history. Independently, this information is only a bit useful -- but once there are sets layering on top of each other and now add a person's genetic information as well...

The level of exposure to the real-world is incalculable.

It does not require much of an imagination to create scenarios where countless remarkably accurate digital avatars of you are running endless simulations and generating a prediction of what you did seconds before you did it. Consider the impact that such a predictive capacity can have on influencing or outright manipulating the decisions you make. What could be done with the information of what you are likely to do or the set of circumstances that need to be in place to create a different outcome. Free will?

This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say!

The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts?

Perhaps.

It is not my desire to fear-monger or engage in conspiracy theories. If I can craft these ideas on my mobile phone while on my Sunday walk, then imagine what sophisticated, profit-motivated computer engineers do with these postulations. They are opportunities to grow their corporations' market cap.


Hearing footsteps
Our decisions on how to protect our digital selves make us vulnerable. It’s probably because we can’t hear the footsteps echoing in the alley behind us ... or the hairs on the back of our necks are not standing up because we cannot sense a threat lurking in the shadows.

Where are the shadows?

They are so abstract we do not have the skills to even perceive them. We are like toddlers stumbling out of the cave surrounded by Sabre-tooth tigers.

My goal with this post is to encourage all of us to develop these new skills to perceive danger quickly and sharpen our instincts. I have no idea what race we are running but I am fairly sure “they” have a head start.

I think it is important at this point to acknowledge my role as an elected person with the responsibility of regulating and enforcing the protection of the public interest. 

Governments have been slow to respond and even slower to act and this needs to change. So, I also scribe this post as a political marker as well, noting that we must do much better in this area!


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more