Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say! The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts


I had an interesting conversation with a couple of friends about the threat of digital intrusions. How far will you let the perception of convenience justify your personal vulnerability? Is it too much work to care about how corporations are using the data we trade for access to their latest time saving / consuming application or service?

Does it require to much of our bandwidth to actually go back and limit personal access?

Maybe it's easier to believe that there isn’t possibly anything in your life that they will find interesting.

Are they looking for interesting? Are they seeking anything in particular? What if they are only harvesting data points to sell or lease them? Or they could be building a digital avatar of you that gains definition with every input.

These are all important questions that I fear too few of us are asking.


Checking the box
Another aspect, of the business of data, is that what they are harvesting now could be used for something different later. That is the problem with the evolving culture of privacy policies. They are so difficult to understand that we mostly forgo reading them. When was the last time you agreed to what was in the privacy policy? Let me put this another way. When you check the box, are you agreeing to the privacy policy, or are you agreeing that you want the perceived benefits of the service, which you cannot access unless you check the box?

Privacy policies change and we have to update our agreement with them. When they do, what has changed? Why? What is the difference between the new agreement and the old one? Do we even know?


This comes up again for me after reading a Global News article about the explosion of DNA collection and testing. We buy the sales pitch because deep down we all want to know who we are and where we come from. We are curious about the genetic material, the code, that makes each one of us our beautiful unique selves.


Collecting points
Think of each privacy policy you sign as a data set. Each set is harvesting in real time data points. It might be a collection of markers from your mobile phone’s health or habit application. Or it is the purchase history of your credit card. Throw in your web search and browser history. Independently, this information is only a bit useful -- but once there are sets layering on top of each other and now add a person's genetic information as well...

The level of exposure to the real-world is incalculable.

It does not require much of an imagination to create scenarios where countless remarkably accurate digital avatars of you are running endless simulations and generating a prediction of what you did seconds before you did it. Consider the impact that such a predictive capacity can have on influencing or outright manipulating the decisions you make. What could be done with the information of what you are likely to do or the set of circumstances that need to be in place to create a different outcome. Free will?

This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say!

The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts?

Perhaps.

It is not my desire to fear-monger or engage in conspiracy theories. If I can craft these ideas on my mobile phone while on my Sunday walk, then imagine what sophisticated, profit-motivated computer engineers do with these postulations. They are opportunities to grow their corporations' market cap.


Hearing footsteps
Our decisions on how to protect our digital selves make us vulnerable. It’s probably because we can’t hear the footsteps echoing in the alley behind us ... or the hairs on the back of our necks are not standing up because we cannot sense a threat lurking in the shadows.

Where are the shadows?

They are so abstract we do not have the skills to even perceive them. We are like toddlers stumbling out of the cave surrounded by Sabre-tooth tigers.

My goal with this post is to encourage all of us to develop these new skills to perceive danger quickly and sharpen our instincts. I have no idea what race we are running but I am fairly sure “they” have a head start.

I think it is important at this point to acknowledge my role as an elected person with the responsibility of regulating and enforcing the protection of the public interest. 

Governments have been slow to respond and even slower to act and this needs to change. So, I also scribe this post as a political marker as well, noting that we must do much better in this area!


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more