Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say! The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts


I had an interesting conversation with a couple of friends about the threat of digital intrusions. How far will you let the perception of convenience justify your personal vulnerability? Is it too much work to care about how corporations are using the data we trade for access to their latest time saving / consuming application or service?

Does it require to much of our bandwidth to actually go back and limit personal access?

Maybe it's easier to believe that there isn’t possibly anything in your life that they will find interesting.

Are they looking for interesting? Are they seeking anything in particular? What if they are only harvesting data points to sell or lease them? Or they could be building a digital avatar of you that gains definition with every input.

These are all important questions that I fear too few of us are asking.


Checking the box
Another aspect, of the business of data, is that what they are harvesting now could be used for something different later. That is the problem with the evolving culture of privacy policies. They are so difficult to understand that we mostly forgo reading them. When was the last time you agreed to what was in the privacy policy? Let me put this another way. When you check the box, are you agreeing to the privacy policy, or are you agreeing that you want the perceived benefits of the service, which you cannot access unless you check the box?

Privacy policies change and we have to update our agreement with them. When they do, what has changed? Why? What is the difference between the new agreement and the old one? Do we even know?


This comes up again for me after reading a Global News article about the explosion of DNA collection and testing. We buy the sales pitch because deep down we all want to know who we are and where we come from. We are curious about the genetic material, the code, that makes each one of us our beautiful unique selves.


Collecting points
Think of each privacy policy you sign as a data set. Each set is harvesting in real time data points. It might be a collection of markers from your mobile phone’s health or habit application. Or it is the purchase history of your credit card. Throw in your web search and browser history. Independently, this information is only a bit useful -- but once there are sets layering on top of each other and now add a person's genetic information as well...

The level of exposure to the real-world is incalculable.

It does not require much of an imagination to create scenarios where countless remarkably accurate digital avatars of you are running endless simulations and generating a prediction of what you did seconds before you did it. Consider the impact that such a predictive capacity can have on influencing or outright manipulating the decisions you make. What could be done with the information of what you are likely to do or the set of circumstances that need to be in place to create a different outcome. Free will?

This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say!

The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts?

Perhaps.

It is not my desire to fear-monger or engage in conspiracy theories. If I can craft these ideas on my mobile phone while on my Sunday walk, then imagine what sophisticated, profit-motivated computer engineers do with these postulations. They are opportunities to grow their corporations' market cap.


Hearing footsteps
Our decisions on how to protect our digital selves make us vulnerable. It’s probably because we can’t hear the footsteps echoing in the alley behind us ... or the hairs on the back of our necks are not standing up because we cannot sense a threat lurking in the shadows.

Where are the shadows?

They are so abstract we do not have the skills to even perceive them. We are like toddlers stumbling out of the cave surrounded by Sabre-tooth tigers.

My goal with this post is to encourage all of us to develop these new skills to perceive danger quickly and sharpen our instincts. I have no idea what race we are running but I am fairly sure “they” have a head start.

I think it is important at this point to acknowledge my role as an elected person with the responsibility of regulating and enforcing the protection of the public interest. 

Governments have been slow to respond and even slower to act and this needs to change. So, I also scribe this post as a political marker as well, noting that we must do much better in this area!


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more