Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages


Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th

Earlier this week (Monday May 13th) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).  They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency.

Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted.

Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman (we’ll call her Mary Brown) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced.

She said to me, “I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”. 

“I am not about to suggest those with children are not responsible for their payments however, Family Maintenance can make it impossible for these men and woman to actually pay rent and live, based on the cost of living and having their wages garnisheed by family maintenance.

Interesting questions I thought, so I inquired of them to the Ministry of the Attorney General, “Are there any statistics regarding the number of people assessed child maintenance, that end up having the payment garnished from their wages?”

Back came the reply, “When necessary – and only when necessary – the program can attach (garnish) wages. At any given time, about 1 payor in 5 will have such action taken”.

But back to the email from Mary Brown, and her wonderings ...

“I would almost guarantee that a very high percentage of homelessness is of those who just could not cope with not being able to survive the financial crush month after month”. 

Unfortunately, according to the Ministry of the Attorney General, the response to this was that they ... do not have these statistics.

That said, as to the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP) itself, Attorney General David Eby noted that, “The old model was criticized in 2017 by the auditor general as based on a problematic contract tendering process ... about to expire after 10 years of failed negotiations, creating uncertainty about the future of this vital program.”

Eby said, “This new Crown agency will build a foundation for services that are predictable and sustainable for vulnerable families, and make it easier to add new services in the future.”


While Mary Brown is in full agreement that, “... there does need to be accountability from those who have walked away from their payments of their children” -- she also believes that -- “... a review needs to be done on Family Maintenance as well”.

“I believe if payments were more reasonable you may see a change for the better instead of the dead-beat dad or mom syndrome ...”, she said.

When asked about this, however, the Ministry of the Attorney General indicated to me that, “The program has the discretion to accept repayment plans on overdue maintenance, and these plans take into account the financial circumstances of the payor”.

“As the monthly amount is set by the Court”, they indicated to me, “The program cannot override that amount. The program can provide a number of options and referrals to payors on how to vary / change the amount of support that they are required to pay”.

This sounds an awful lot like why Mary contacted me in the first place, and laid out her concerns to me.

“I have watched my nephew go down to the gutter over the last 8 years, due to not being able to survive at his job, and live, so he became homeless and addicted, only to become an empty shell”.

“Over time he crawled out of the gutter and worked under the table to try and get ahead to prepare to start a good job. He did this because he knew family maintenance would be there for garnishee, but he also knew that he would barely be able to feed himself”.

“What I am saying is this system is failed, and seriously needs to be looked at”.

I did ask the Attorney Generals Ministry, of David Eby, about this however there was no direct response.  Instead I was told that the:

“... transition to the new Crown agency is not intended to impact services and outcomes for the families that rely on the program. As with the contracted service provider, the agency will provide services to families and children entitled to child support and spousal support under maintenance orders or agreements. Families will continue to receive the services the way they do today”.

I was also told that for parent being provided services, in terms of Family Maintenance, that:

“It is anticipated that by establishing a closer relationship than is available through a contract, the agency will offer opportunities for enhancements, changes and additional services in the future”. 

Mary Brown is NOT the first person I have heard from, or spoken too, about the hardships that can be imposed on those trying to do the right thing, by providing for their children. It seems however that at times perhaps, a little flexibility could see things go more smoothly.

That instead of, as she said ... making it impossible for these men and woman to actually pay rent and live, based on the cost of living, and having their wages garnisheed by family maintenance

As for now, according to Monday’s media release, the agency will work directly with government to support the goals of increasing access to justice and delivering services to British Columbians in a people-focused way. It will also help improve the process for developing legislation and policies that achieve these goals.



Learn More:
 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more