Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The consolidation and integration of our media results in the dull, ‘government-speak’ pap we detest


I recently wrote about the makeup of the Parliamentary Press Gallery.  

We need to know why the “Parliamentary Press Gallery” memberships are controlled by a private corporation. No private corporation should have the right to use Parliament or Parliamentary in its name as it is highly misleading; suggesting that it is a formal part of government.

Our Parliamentary Press Gallery must be an agency of government reporting to the House of Commons, and have an open and transparent means of appeal for any journalist who is refused membership.


A free press must not be managed by a private corporation, particularly not the segment reporting on the events and issues surrounding our government and governance.

Access to the press gallery includes access to house and committee proceedings, as well as some access to Ministers. 

Press Gallery membership is much more than being able to sit in the public galleries to observe proceedings ... otherwise we are being denied access to vital information. 

Part of a free press is access to information that is not managed by vested interests ... government or non-government.


The system may have worked for the century, when we had a highly a competitive media, but since media ownership consolidation began in the 1980s, competition has been strangled. Newsrooms have shrunk and editing has been centralized. A single central editorial staff may approve news stories for dozens of cable, radio, print and television outlets under a single ownership.

The consolidation and integration of our media results in the dull, ‘government-speak’ pap we detest. It also allows media outlets to intensify editorial control during an election campaign. Media owners are aware of the enormous influence they wield, and are mindful of the subsidies they receive or may not receive with a change in government.

Media consolidation is contrary to the public interest. Contrary because we do not receive the same broad range of opinion and views that a competitive media brought us, and we risk the undue influence that a consolidated media can bring to bear.

Governments should fear an independent, competitive free press – a free press is the eyes and ears of the public.

A consolidated media is something governments can pacify rather than fear, and that, is dangerous to a democracy.

Tyrants control the media and hide their plans ... while democracies thrive with a free press, and wither without it.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more