Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

It’s taken long enough for Wilkinson’ Liberals to acknowledge this ... perhaps now is the time for he and Bolin to sit down and discuss what electoral financing reform should look like


With CBC News reporting a poll from Mario Canseco of Research Company now showing the BC Liberal Party sitting at 30% support across the province, a 10% drop from the 2017 election, leader Andrew Wilkinson introduced legislation on Tuesday (May 28th) today that would ban foreign interference in British Columbia politics.

In doing so, he stated, “The serious issue of foreign money and influence in elections has been making headlines for years now and many countries have taken action. It’s time for B.C. to firmly protect the integrity of our elections.”

The only problem is that BC Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkson is ‘late to the party’ to quote an old saying.

LONG before other political parties had decided to make electoral financing an issue of concern, BC Conservatives had already put policy in place that as government they would ... enact legislation relating to political contributions to registered British Columbia political parties, limiting such donations to those received only from individuals and banning donations from corporations, unions and all other similar entities.

And so, it definitely seems like Conservatives were driving the boat on that one.

Now, getting back to Wilkinson’s bill announced earlier this week; it would prohibit contributions from any foreign person, government, or political organization for any purpose related to an election. Foreign-funded individuals and organizations would also be prohibited from making false or misleading communications for any purpose related to an election in B.C.


Trevor Bolin, BC Conservative Party leader, stated, “It definitely feels like the BC Liberals are late on this one as well”.

At our Annual General Meeting last year, our grassroots membership brought forward policy confirming that ... no political party, candidate, or third-party- advertiser shall receive funding or other types of financial or material support for their election campaign from a foreign entity”.  

Bolin continued, “Our policies for democratic reform and government accountability are reaching British Columbians.  While Canseco’s poll is showing our Party at 9% across the province, we are well into the mid to late teens percentage wise in the interior of BC ... and the North”.

"In fact", Bolin stated, "Results of a poll of over 8,200 their readers, taken by Castanet, showed Liberals in the Okanagan / southern interior at just over 41% support, while the BC Conservatives were just 10 points back at just over 31%”


Regarding those supporting the BC Conservatives in the CBC story; Bolin was welcoming of the current voter intentions, and Canseco’s comment that; “... the increased support for the B.C. Conservatives is likely the result of centre right voters looking for an alternative to the Liberals.”

The Liberals, both in government and as the official opposition, have not led the way when it comes to government that people can respect and trust”, 
observed Conservative Leader Trevor Bolin. 

“Our policies, such as we already have in place on election financing and foreign interference, ARE going to attract not only centre right British Columbians, but also those just looking for government that is not out for itself ... or those funding them with big campaign cheques”, Bolin continued.

The Liberals Wilkinson is NOW stating that .... it’s time to take back control and guarantee that political power remains in the hands of British Columbians.

Furthermore, he went on to say, “This is beyond partisan politics, and I am confident that all parties in the Legislature will support this important measure to protect our democracy and keeping British Columbians in charge of their own elections.”

It’s taken long enough for them to acknowledge this ... perhaps now is the time for he and Bolin to sit down and discuss what electoral financing reform should look like, and perhaps come out with joint legislation to be put before the BC Legislature.

Now that would be ‘non-partisanship’ indeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more