Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Stepping outside its constitutional authority is risky business for any government but Trudeau appears oblivious to constitutional convention


Mark Norman’s lawyer warns of interference in courts despite dropped charge
Lee Berthiaume, ~~ The Canadian Press ~~ May 8, 2019

OTTAWA — Canadians must be on guard against government efforts to tip the scales of justice, said Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's lawyer on Wednesday, as she hailed the surprise stay of a breach-of-trust charge against her client.

That decision came despite — "not because of" — the Trudeau government's interference in the case ... that included withholding key documents and information that could have helped ... demonstrate his (Mark Norman) innocence on allegations he tried to undermine a federal cabinet deliberation on a large shipbuilding contract.

"No person in this country should ever walk into a courtroom and feel like they are fighting their elected government or any sort of political factors at all," Henein told a packed news conference right after Norman's final court appearance.

The stay effectively ends one of the most high-profile and politically charged criminal cases in Canadian history and means it will not run through the fall federal election campaign, as had been scheduled.

CLICK HERE to read the full story
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman


The petulance and pettiness of this prosecution never fails to astound.

The prosecution did not ‘drop charges’ against Norman. It stayed charges which is quite different; the charge can be re-laid for the next year. It is not a clean break for Norman.

The decision to cover Norman’s legal fees is ironic ...  as the government denied Norman access to legal defence funds available to other government employees in the same circumstances.

The decision to stay charges against Norman is politically motivated ... the governments refusal to make documents available to defence lawyers is consistent with government efforts to hide disclosure of matters related to the SNC-Lavalin scandal.

The government is leaking information that the decision to stay the Norman charges were due to information disclosed by former Tory cabinet ministers, but that story does not hold water. Crown prosecutors do not go to court if they suspect their client is sitting on information that will blow up a case mid-trial. Additionally, refusal by the government to provide unedited copies of records indicates what is being withheld is damaging to the government case.   

There has been no evidence presented Norman was engaged in unlawful activities that warranted criminal proceedings. His transgression was to question the Prime Minister’s Office activities which appear questionable at best and criminal at worst. Wilson-Raybould, Philpott and Norman have all paid heavy penalties for questioning actions of their party and leader.


What is particularly disturbing is that the request for investigation into the Norman affair, originated with the Privy Council Office, which is an advisory body to the Governor General. It is not intended to be a tool of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and is being abused by the PMO.

Executive powers constitutionally reside with the Queen and Governor General. It would be extraordinary for the Governor General to sanction the criminal investigation of an officer of the crown. Most people would consider that unwarranted executive interference in a democratic government.

Stepping outside its’ constitutional authority is risky business for any government, but Trudeau appears oblivious to constitutional convention. Meanwhile, other parties have been silent on how they propose to cure the disease of governments operating in secrecy while claiming to be democratic. It is not an issue confined to the current government; it is an unacceptable affront to the democratic principle of government accountability to the public and has been carried from Tory to Whig and back for decades.

The concept of unwavering allegiance to a political party and its leader rather than to the nation and its people is a repugnant affront to a democratic institution. Our elected representatives swear an oath of allegiance to Queen and country, but in practice owe their allegiance to party and leader.

We will never get rid of political parties. Like minded people will form groups as we are social animals and tend to gather in groups with similar interests and thoughts. There is nothing wrong with that; the danger is when the group insists it members adhere to policies that all of the group are not comfortable with. That is contrary to our fundamental freedoms of belief, conscience and thought. Election to office does not remove that person’s fundamental charter rights and freedoms.

Political parties must not be allowed to override an elected member’s freedom to consider an issue independently, and cast his or her vote accordingly. The independence of elected members is crucial to his or her free representation of the people who elected them. That principle of democracy has to be restored.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

  1. garret seinenMay 13, 2019 at 7:11 AM

    The handling of both the SNC Lavalin and the Mark Norman legal affairs clearly shows the utter lack of respect for law that pervades the Trudeau Liberal government. Elsewhere you say, "the best defence for democracy is a well-informed electorate." I say it is the only defence and it is today entirely missing. While I know there are some young people coming out of school with thinking skills, publicly, few are visible.

    The media circus of today can't get past transgender, hurtful speech, plastic straw bans and the destruction of 85% of of our energy industry. The future does not look bright.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alan ForsethMay 13, 2019 at 8:56 AM

    I agree ... the biggest issue with a lack of an informed electorate, is that many Canadians are only interested in rearing about what's in it for them. Regrettably having been told, and then not delivered on promises of political parties in the past, these same people keep doing the same thing -- and they circled goes round and round.

    An educated electorate is essential, however I know from the experience of having run for political office 20+ years ago, people only hear what they want to hear -- and sadly, it seems that still hasn't changed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. garret seinenMay 13, 2019 at 9:29 AM

    Alan I concur but I think the root cause goes deeper. For generations now we have been mislead into accepting the idea that we are incapable of being productive over a lifetime. We are told a young, productive, new generation is needed to support the ever increasing geriatric death-defies. Absent rampant government induced inflation, past saving would easily carry prosperity to the end of life.

    When one believes in personal helplessness it is all to easy to reach the conclusion that milking the productive is the answer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more