Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Political leaders and parties, including members of May’s own Conservative Party, have turned one of the world’s oldest democratic institutions into a basket case


Lessons from Brexit:

The Brexit debates in the UK Parliament are surreal. It is hard to believe the current incumbents, of the UK Commons, are working in the heart of modern democracy.

When the government decided to hold a referendum on Brexit, it consulted with the highest power in any democratic nation – the people. Following several months of intense political campaigning for and against, the people spoke. Leave the European Union. It is hurting us.

Some politicians kept acting as if they had a choice. Initially they focused on negotiating an exit deal. The minority government did so.

Opposition parties screamed: “Not good enough!”. Nothing would have been ‘good enough’ as many were opposed leaving the EU, and this was how they could throw a wrench in the works.

Opposition benches have managed to delay and stall an orderly and rational parting with the EU not because it is right, but because they can. They are not certain enough of their grounds to defeat the government and force a general election, so they continue with irresponsible demands.

MPs have forgotten that they are in breach of the nation’s highest court; the people of the United Kingdom. A public referendum is no less binding than a general election. The people have spoken. The decision to leave the EU was not made by Prime Minister May, but it is the duty of Parliament to obey the order.

The Opposition is on thin ice causing the government to miss exit deadlines. It has no valid reasons for doing so. It is so intent on blaming Theresa May for a referendum outcome, it is ignoring the people it was elected to serve.

Political leaders and parties -- including members of Ms. May’s own Conservative Party -- have turned one of the world’s oldest democratic institutions into a basket case. There is not one in the whole lot worthy of re-election. They have shown their colours and they are the Jolly Roger.

There are lessons for Canada in the UK debacle. One is that political parties are the ruination of democracy.


When political infighting is more important than the responsibilities of governance, democracy is doomed. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May has already hinted that she wants to follow the destructive and obstructive path that is tearing the UK parliament apart. She will do anything to obstruct a conservative minority following the next election. She too has flown the pirate flag and is unfit for office in a democracy.

Every parliamentarian, whether on the government or opposition benches has a duty to ensure that a government’s responsibilities are adequately and promptly carried out. The rest of it is widow dressing, allowable only as long as the fundamental responsibilities are dealt with.

Our MPs spend all their time on window dressing and ignore their responsibilities.

Playing political games is more entertaining than the dreary duties of responsible governance. Saving the world is more attractive than wrestling with domestic issues and responsibilities.

The pretense that our federal government is a step above the provinces is nonsense. The federal and provincial governments have different powers and responsibilities. For decades, the federal government has blurred lines by encroaching on provincial jurisdictions -- that is not good governance.

The federal government must mind its responsibilities and leave the provinces to mind theirs. That would remove many of the conflicts unconstitutional federal mucking about has created.  

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more