Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- The "strong economy" is somehow not translating to the people


A common theme for the BC NDP government is affordability. They focus on how they are decreasing the impact of the rising costs in all aspects of our lives. Every announcement is tagged with how they are making life more affordable.

Even as a government boasts about the "strong economy", many British Columbians are struggling. While the government points to the gross domestic product (GDP), the economic indicator most commonly used to support the narrative that we are doing well, food, housing and transportation costs overwhelm people and families.

The "strong economy" is somehow not translating to the people.

As I wrote on Tuesday, "Many people in our communities are struggling because the cost of living is outpacing incomes, pensions and savings. Disruption in our workforce and the changing nature of work, compensation and remuneration are further adding stress to these growing social tensions."


Reviewing labour

In the "Report of the B.C. Labour Relations Code Review Panel" the panelists highlight the history of ideological policy lurches in our province.

In their words, "There have been a number of pendulum swings in important Code provisions over the past 30 years largely depending on the governing political party. This is not consistent with predictability, certainty or balance”.

“Although not an easy task, it is essential to avoid pendulum swings by implementing balanced changes that are sustainable. Certainty and predictability are important considerations for investment decisions and the competitive position of B.C. in an increasingly globalized economy."

This statement follows a thorough description of how the economy, and work, is changing.


Over the decades, demographics, the growth of non-standard work, globalization and fissuring, technology, growth of the service sector and union density are all evolving. I recommend you read the executive summary of the report to learn more about the specifics of each of these issues.

So, when it comes to work and workers, swinging between polarized political ideologies is "not consistent with predictability, certainty or balance".  However, this is a tradition in British Columbia, and part our culture.

It is easy for politicians to get in the sandbox and throw sand at each other. It's easy for journalists to report on the sand-throwing incident. This is how we have always handled labour issues in our province and it’s the easy narrative.


De-polarizing labour

When there are only two voices on the topic, it reinforces the polarity. But that has changed as well. Now, the Green Party is a third voice in the discussion, and I have no interest climbing into the sandbox.

As legislators, we have a responsibility to understand the current conditions and develop the appropriate policy. This is especially true for government legislators.

Government has to steward the economy and look after people. In my opinion there should be no polarity there because it is all part of the same sphere.

In 2019, we must be using the proper tools to evaluate the strength of our society and that is not possible by measuring the number and amount of economic transactions alone. There are substantial challenges with solely measuring progress by the GDP because there are many other metrics we could track.

That is why I believe we should measure our health, and well-being, with genuine progress indicators (GPI). Such a framework decouples social well-being and economic growth, and instead measures them separately. In addition, we have to understand the changing nature of work.


The report provides a clear warning to pay attention to the trends toward more precarious work, changing compensation and remuneration and the relationship between employer and employee. We must be seriously investigating new ways to provide livable incomes and job security in this evolving landscape.

We do not help affordability in British Columbia by lurching between diametrically opposed political and economic ideologies.

It's time to rethink how we evaluate our economic and social strengths and be open to finding dynamic solutions for labour.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more