Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: It seems to me that without having the PET/CT scanner doctors will be trying to diagnose patients with one hand tied behind their backs


Those with a long enough memory (you’ll likely have either grey, or no, hair) may remember that in the lead-up to the October 17th 1991 provincial election, NDP leader Mike Harcourt promised THREE new cancer centres would be built in the province.

 

They would be in Kelowna, Prince George, and in Kamloops.

Regarding the Kamloops Cancer Centre, a May 2013th story in BC Political Reports notes the following timeline commitments:

 

·        September 1991: The NDP candidate in the Kamloops riding claims clinic has been delayed 15 months so the Socreds can announce its construction after the election is called. (As of the 1991 election there are two Kamloops ridings – North Thompson and South).

·        October 4: Kamloops NDP candidate Art Charbonneau says his party is committed to the cancer-clinic project

 

No sooner had Harcourt defeated the then governing Social Credit Party, in the ’91 election, than that promise fell by the wayside with a massive thud. 

There would be NO cancer centre for Prince George ... and NO cancer centre for Kamloops.

In the three and a half decades (34 years) that have followed, Kamloops residents have been betrayed, over and over again, as successive governments (both NDP and Liberal) made the same promises, never to be followed through on.

Until now ....

Last year (February 8th, 2024) the provincial NDP government once again guaranteed that Kamloops would finally get its much promised cancer centre. Problem is, what’s been promised, versus what is being built, is not what we in Kamloops need and deserve.

Instead, cancer treatment will be split over two different facilities (no other cancer clinic operates this way, including the 3 others that are being built) ... and, unlike every other cancer centre in BC, ours will not have a PET / CT scanner.

 

Why is that important?  Well for two reasons.

In todays (July 24th) official ground-breaking announcement in Kamloops, BC NDP Health Minister Josie Osborne stated ... “This centre is a vital step toward ensuring people in the Thompson-Cariboo-Shuswap region receive timely, high-quality cancer care, when and where they need it most.”


And from Bowinn Ma, Minister of Infrastructure, we heard ... “By building a facility equipped with the latest technology designed to meet the growing treatment needs of patients in the area, we're helping more people have access to high-quality cancer care closer to home.”

It can certainly be argued that having cancer care split over two different facilities is NOT high-quality cancer care ... nor will it be high-quality cancer care as the new building will not be equipped with the latest technology.

Where is our PET/CT scanner? Because without it, the promise of “High quality cancer care’ all within a ‘facility equipped with the latest technology’ is simply not true. 

 

And for those asking, “What the heck is a PET/CT scanner?”, an AI overview provides the following:

A PET/CT scanner combines two imaging technologies: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT). PET scans show how organs and tissues are functioning, while CT scans provide detailed anatomical images. 

This combination allows doctors to pinpoint the location of abnormalities and assess their activity, which is particularly useful in diagnosing and staging cancer, as well as evaluating treatment response. 

It seems to me that without having the PET/CT scanner, doctors will be trying to diagnose patients with one hand tied behind their backs. How does that fit with the latest technology to provide high quality care?

For three and a half decades Kamloops has fought to receive what was promised in 1991.

For three and a half decades we have also asked that the facility have the necessary equipment and technology to provide high quality cancer care.

WE have also asked that this be located within one building – NOT split over two.

This government has, despite today's announced, failed on all counts. Once again, Kamloops gets the shaft.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more