Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: It seems to me that without having the PET/CT scanner doctors will be trying to diagnose patients with one hand tied behind their backs


Those with a long enough memory (you’ll likely have either grey, or no, hair) may remember that in the lead-up to the October 17th 1991 provincial election, NDP leader Mike Harcourt promised THREE new cancer centres would be built in the province.

 

They would be in Kelowna, Prince George, and in Kamloops.

Regarding the Kamloops Cancer Centre, a May 2013th story in BC Political Reports notes the following timeline commitments:

 

·        September 1991: The NDP candidate in the Kamloops riding claims clinic has been delayed 15 months so the Socreds can announce its construction after the election is called. (As of the 1991 election there are two Kamloops ridings – North Thompson and South).

·        October 4: Kamloops NDP candidate Art Charbonneau says his party is committed to the cancer-clinic project

 

No sooner had Harcourt defeated the then governing Social Credit Party, in the ’91 election, than that promise fell by the wayside with a massive thud. 

There would be NO cancer centre for Prince George ... and NO cancer centre for Kamloops.

In the three and a half decades (34 years) that have followed, Kamloops residents have been betrayed, over and over again, as successive governments (both NDP and Liberal) made the same promises, never to be followed through on.

Until now ....

Last year (February 8th, 2024) the provincial NDP government once again guaranteed that Kamloops would finally get its much promised cancer centre. Problem is, what’s been promised, versus what is being built, is not what we in Kamloops need and deserve.

Instead, cancer treatment will be split over two different facilities (no other cancer clinic operates this way, including the 3 others that are being built) ... and, unlike every other cancer centre in BC, ours will not have a PET / CT scanner.

 

Why is that important?  Well for two reasons.

In todays (July 24th) official ground-breaking announcement in Kamloops, BC NDP Health Minister Josie Osborne stated ... “This centre is a vital step toward ensuring people in the Thompson-Cariboo-Shuswap region receive timely, high-quality cancer care, when and where they need it most.”


And from Bowinn Ma, Minister of Infrastructure, we heard ... “By building a facility equipped with the latest technology designed to meet the growing treatment needs of patients in the area, we're helping more people have access to high-quality cancer care closer to home.”

It can certainly be argued that having cancer care split over two different facilities is NOT high-quality cancer care ... nor will it be high-quality cancer care as the new building will not be equipped with the latest technology.

Where is our PET/CT scanner? Because without it, the promise of “High quality cancer care’ all within a ‘facility equipped with the latest technology’ is simply not true. 

 

And for those asking, “What the heck is a PET/CT scanner?”, an AI overview provides the following:

A PET/CT scanner combines two imaging technologies: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT). PET scans show how organs and tissues are functioning, while CT scans provide detailed anatomical images. 

This combination allows doctors to pinpoint the location of abnormalities and assess their activity, which is particularly useful in diagnosing and staging cancer, as well as evaluating treatment response. 

It seems to me that without having the PET/CT scanner, doctors will be trying to diagnose patients with one hand tied behind their backs. How does that fit with the latest technology to provide high quality care?

For three and a half decades Kamloops has fought to receive what was promised in 1991.

For three and a half decades we have also asked that the facility have the necessary equipment and technology to provide high quality cancer care.

WE have also asked that this be located within one building – NOT split over two.

This government has, despite today's announced, failed on all counts. Once again, Kamloops gets the shaft.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more