Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Subsidizing Failure: BC Conservative Critic for Municipal Affairs and Local Government Slams $250M Metro Vancouver Developer Deal

IMAGE CREDIT:  Metro Vancouver

BC Conservative MLA Tony Luck is calling out the provincial and federal governments for what he is describing as a reckless bailout of Metro Vancouver’s broken development model, one that’s now being backstopped with a quarter-billion dollars in taxpayer money.

This week, it was revealed that the province has quietly slashed development fees for dozens of in-progress Metro Vancouver projects after a dramatic fee hike implemented by Metro’s mayors, many of whom voted for the increase in 2023 despite repeated industry warnings. That $220 million shortfall will now be covered by federal dollars, meaning Canadians across the country will pay the price for Metro’s mismanagement.

“Let’s be clear, this isn’t about building housing,” said Luck, MLA for Fraser-Nicola and Official Opposition Critic for Municipal Affairs and Local Government. “It’s about rewarding the worst-run region in the country with a blank cheque. Communities like Merritt and Kamloops manage to grow without dumping their failures on the rest of Canada. Metro should be forced to do the same.”

The new arrangement applies to any development application submitted before March 22, 2024, with permits issued before March 2026, locking in developers under a lower cost regime while infrastructure demands continue to rise.

“Instead of reining in spending or prioritizing smart growth, Metro’s solution is to pass the bill to Ottawa and hope nobody notices, all while, in many cases, paying themselves egregiously large salaries,” said Luck. 

“This is exactly the kind of policy failure and fiscal mismanagement that erodes public trust. Hardworking taxpayers deserve better.”

Luck is calling on the BC NDP to commit to equitable infrastructure funding across all regions and to table a full accounting of how the $250 million will be used. He also says local governments must be held to higher standards when setting fees.

“This government is picking winners, and rural British Columbians aren’t on the list,” Luck said. “Metro mayors jacked up development fees and now they’ve been bailed out. That’s not fiscal responsibility, it’s political favouritism.”



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more