Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- There must be a better way to settle their differences

Image Credit:  BCGEU

 

UPDATE: Since the writing of this commentary, the BCGEU and the Province have entered into contract mediation:

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2025FIN0037-001025 


BC government employees are essential in delivering services to the people of BC … whether in healthcare, education, providing forms and documents for all matter of things from name changes, to drivers licenses … business registrations to healthcare cards  … and much more

In fact the BC government, in describing just one area -- Service BC -- states: “Service BC provides front line support for many of the hundreds of programs and services the provincial government offers to residents, businesses and visitors.”

But Service BC is just the tip of the iceberg because public sector workers, employed by the government of BC, deliver a multitude of public programs and services.

Important stuff then, right?  Is there anyone who disagrees so far? So I’m going to ask this question, “Can we do without these employees?”.  

I don’t think so. So why then, why are the residents of BC seeing a disruption of government services by thousand of BC General Employee Workers (BCGEU)?

According to the Public Sector Bargaining section of the BCGEU website, there are now over 25,000 employees either on strike, or partially on strike, at hundreds of worksites. They include employees at the following:

  •  BC Pension Corporation
  •  Citizens' Services (including Service BC)
  •  Commercial Vehicle Safety and Enforcement (CVSE)
  •  Education and Child Care
  •  Employment Standards Branch
  •  Energy and Climate Solutions
  •  Finance
  •  Forest Practices Board
  •  Housing and Municipal Affairs
  •  Indigenous Relations & Reconciliation 
  • Infrastructure 
  • Jobs and Economic Growth
  •  Liquor Distribution Branch (LDB) including all BC Liquor and BC         Cannabis stores, the LDB warehouses and headquarters
  •  Mining and Critical Minerals
  •  Office of the Premier
  •  Post-Secondary Education and Future Skills
  •  Royal B.C. Museum
  •  Tourism, Arts, Culture and Sport
  •  Water, Land and Resource Stewardship


Additionally, there are 1,900 BCGEU members have also implemented an overtime ban in Corrections, and Sheriff Services. 

If a service provided to the residents of BC is important enough that’s it’s delivered by the government, then that service is, in my opinion, essential.

Let’s take a look, for a moment, at the meaning of ‘essential’. Merriam-Webster describes the word as, ‘of the utmost importance’.  

Synonyms, or other words that can be used instead of ‘essential’ include ... important, necessary, crucial, vital, and necessity.

Now for me liquor and cannabis distribution doesn’t matter because I don’t use them; but that’s just me. However other areas do matter.

  • Vehicle safety – Yes, vitally important
  • Citizens Services ... Yes, vitally important.
  • Ministry of Finance ... Yes, vitally important.
  • With the province’s finances on life-support, can we really afford to  have the Ministry of Mining shut down? Yes, it’s essential. 
  • One of the things the Ministry of Water, Land, and Resources stewardship does is ensure the health of our ecosystems. Yes, that too seems important.


And then there are students who are being affected in a major way. According to the CBC ... (due to) strike action by BC public sector workers, the province has confirmed that StudentAid BC's online application systems have been taken offline, and payments delayed "until normal service resumes."

But even more trouble is coming down the road if the government and its unions can’t come to an agreement. That’s because there are still thousands of additional public sector workers, with contracts currently being negotiated, including those in the healthcare, social services, and in education. 

Those too, seem important to me. Of the utmost importance in fact. 

On September 2nd public sector workers went on strike, with over twenty-five thousand employees now on the picket lines.  And by the look of things, tens of thousands more will be added in the days and weeks ahead. 

In my opinion, every government department and Ministry is, or should be, vital and essential to the citizens of BC.  With that in mind. Some might say the easy solution is to take away the right to strike.

That is not an option. 

In 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled public sector employees have a constitutional right to strike, under Section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

So now, we have a conundrum.  Services provided by the government of BC are, or should be, considered essential, however the legal right to strike means BC residents, and businesses, are deprived of services that the require.

There must be a better way for the government, and public sector employees, to settle their differences when it comes to contract negotiations ... because BC residents deserve better.

So what do we do? Does anyone have an idea what the solution might be to end this current, and future work stoppages?  

Feel free to share your thoughts in the Comments section.
 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more