Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: Trump suspends Trade Talks but it wasn't because of the Ontario Ad

This is the second time Donald Trump has terminated trade talks with Canada. There's a reason people call him TACO or Trump Always Chickens Out. He says one thing and then reverses himself a few days later. Maybe it'll take a week this time to talk him down or for his medication to kick in.
 
But let's all just keep on thing in mind: Donald Trump didn't suspend the talks due to the ad campaign launched by the Government of Ontario. 
 
Donald Trump suspended those talks because of something Mark Carney said and has been talking about and acting on. 
 
What was that? 
 
Mark Carney stated that he wants to double the amount of trade Canada does with other nations. Today about 80% of Canada's exports go to the United States. Mark Carney wants to make that number about 60%. That's a lofty goal. Normally I'd be among the people saying, good luck with that sir. I've changed my tune and not because of any thing Trump or Carney have said but because of what China and India, well their representatives have said.
 
India's new envoy stated they are open to a full trade agreement with Canada. You may recall Trump hit India with substantial tariffs. China's government has said if we drop our tariffs on Chinese EVs they'll drop theirs on our Canola. 
 
On that latter one, no North American vehicle can compete with a Chinese EV on quality and price. They've got the big three and other Asian manufacturers beat. 
 
Trump wants Canada to be a market for American products but not the vice versa. He wants to keep Canadian products out of the United States.
 
If Canada, and more countries pivot away from the United States and make that work it means fewer markets for American products. 
 
That notion, that very possibility, terrifies American manufacturers. 
 
Donald Trump wants manufacturing brought back home, but manufacturers know that they need foreign markets too. Normally they wouldn't be this bothered but what Donald Trump and Commerce Secretary Lutnick didn't gauge correctly was how resilient the world economy could be. Even with all of Trump's trade wars the world economy is doing far better than anyone expected. While growth is low, most countries still have growing economies. They aren't in the throes of recession like we say in 2007/08.
 
Again, worse for the Americans, is that other countries are adjusting to the trade reality a lot better than economists predicted. Heck, I figured Canada would be in way more trouble than it is. Yes, forestry it getting hit hard. But that aside, this country is pivoting, albeit slowly. 
 
American inflation hit 3% today. Economists know it will go a lot higher. Some predict 12% in 24 months. Maybe that's a bit high, but those tariffs are providing an enormous upward pressure on prices for things the Americans cannot produce like coffee, aluminum and steel in the quantities they need, clothing that is affordable, furniture, and in particular electronics and small appliances. 
 
Donald Trump wants to put Canada under his thumb and the moves the government is making will make that impossible in the long term.
 
And the bad news keeps piling up for Trump. The United States has lost almost 80,000 manufacturing jobs this year. Hiring has fallen every single month until those reports were terminated by his interim secretary. 
 
If I were the Prime Minister right now I'd carry on with business as usual. Trump is undermining the American economy repeating the mistakes of the 1920s tariffs.
 
Wait him out.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more