Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: Canadians to spend less for Christmas ... Good!

I grew in a middle class household and we had a nice Christmas. We visited family. Gifts were nice, but not huge and not terribly expensive. No one would ever have gotten things like computers, laptops, phones, or whole gaming systems. Kids got a toy or two. Often we'd get a toy that all the kids shared. Adults got clothes, my dad would buy my mom a small piece of jewelry.

Christmas wasn't a spend-a-thon.

That was 40 years ago.

Today statistics, news reporting, and word of mouth tells us that people spend a lot of money on gifts. They feel compelled to make Christmas extra special. They'll spend hundreds, and sometimes a couple thousand dollars on gifts for their family members.


Like I said, whole gaming systems like a PS5 or an XBox get bought along with a few games. That's $1,000 or so right there. They'll throw in a new phone, a tablet, a laptop for even more money. I'm not even mentioning the vast quantities of food, alcohol, and restaurants that people spend on.

Nationally, a gross average gives us about $1,675 spent per person from the CBC article. I am assuming that number refers to adults, and not children. I'd feel more comfortable if that was per family. Still, that's a whopping number!

When did Christmas become an orgy of spending?

When did we stop just simply enjoying the holidays and turn it into a, "Who can buy the biggest, most expensive gift contest? Who can host the most impressive Christmas gathering?".

Hearing that Canadians will spend about 10% less this year is a good thing. They should spend less. People shouldn't be racking up massive credit card debt just to impress the people in their lives. Heck, the kids get a new toy and in about six months it will be sitting on a shelf gathering dust and six months after that'll it'll be in a closet or a box.

The stuff I remember from my Christmases growing up was having the time off from school, seeing family, playing outside, watching the holiday cartoons that came on just for that season, and of course the food. We didn't make vast quantities of food either. 

Why? 

Because we didn't believe in making so much food that some would get thrown out. There wasn't a few plates of desserts. There was a dessert.

We liked our gifts and we enjoyed them, but looking back on them they were secondary. It was the holidays themselves we enjoyed.

If people could get back to that two things would immediately happen: they'd spend a lot less money and they'd enjoy the holidays a lot more. Even better, when January rolled around they would not be dreading seeing their credit card statements.

I get the economic implications as why this is happening and the effect spending less will have on the economy.

The economy isn't good. Still, even if it was great, we shouldn't be blowing money like the world was ending on just one day to impress people and buy some love.

You know what? That's not a liberal, conservative, left wing, right wing, etc position. I think that is a universal position - at least, as I see it.

Let me close with this. 

As a kid my fondest memory of the Christmas season was this: my dad, my brother, and I would head out to get a Christmas tree. We lived on a farm for many years and part of it was forested. We'd walk through two feet of snow, sometimes three, to find the right tree. It was as cold as you could imagine and we still loved it. My dad would chop it down with an ax. The three of us, dad did most of the work, hauled it back to the little farm house.

That's what I remember.

No one has to spend themselves into a second mortgage to build a memory that'll last a lifetime.

So it is perfectly acceptable to spend a little less on Christmas.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more