Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

John Rustad and Ward Stamer issue joint statement on BC forestry summit


Premier David Eby and federal minister Dominic LeBlanc are in Vancouver today for a high-profile forestry summit, promising support for workers and businesses struggling under the weight of U.S. tariffs and economic uncertainty.

 

We welcome any real relief for forestry workers and their families, but let’s not pretend this summit is anything more than damage control for a crisis the NDP helped create.

 

The annual allowable cut (AAC) in BC is approximately 63 million cubic metres; however, last year, before Trump’s new tariffs, we only harvested 32 million.

 

This year? We’ll likely fall below 30.

 

That’s not because of international trade. That’s because of years of provincial mismanagement, red tape, and policy paralysis.

 

David Eby’s government has tied the forestry sector in knots with broken permitting systems, ideological land-use policies, and a stumpage model that has left us uncompetitive, undercut, and exposed. Now, with tariffs hammering our exports, we’re watching another taxpayer-funded photo op while real jobs and entire towns disappear.

 

Let’s be clear: half this crisis is made in the U.S., the other half is made in Victoria.

 

While Eby smiles for the cameras in Vancouver, mills are shutting down, and workers are being “transitioned” out of careers they never wanted to leave. This is what happens when you treat the forest industry as a problem to manage, rather than a pillar to protect.

 

We don’t need another roundtable.

We don’t need more announcements.

We need a government that will get out of the way and fight for our forestry workers.

 

The BC Conservatives are ready to:

1.   Scrap the broken stumpage model

2.   Streamline permits with a one-project, one-permit process

3.   Shift to a fibre-based AAC

4.   Ban glyphosate aerial spraying and restore proper wildfire management

5.   Rebuild the workforce through skills training and emergency support

6.   And take a real stand on internal trade barriers and foreign tariffs

 

BC’s forestry sector doesn’t need sympathy from the same politicians who helped run it into the ground.

 

It needs a government that gives a damn and knows what the hell it’s doing.

If Eby wants a “Team Canada” approach, he should start by taking serious steps to protect jobs and communities, rather than undermining our economy with excessive red tape and symbolic summits.

 

Until then, this is just another headline to cover for a decade of NDP failure.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more