Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KOSSOVAN: Why nobody plans for the future anymore


By Nick Kossovan — February 2, 2026

Long-term plans assume stability. Right now, stability is the one thing people can’t count on


Have you noticed that nobody talks about the future anymore?

What’s there to say when hyper-technological change is wiping out professions and industries with no rebound in sight, geopolitical relationships once thought solid now feel like exposed raw nerves, and yesterday’s acceptable behaviour is today’s offence under the banner of “social progress”? Much of the angst I see and hear around me comes from not knowing what lies ahead.

A semblance of stability no longer exists. Government, employers and social values are changing faster than anyone can plan for, with no attachment to tomorrow and plenty of exit doors in sight. Everything feels short-term. As employees are increasingly viewed as liabilities, careers have become contracts with escape plans.

Marriages used to be understood as “forever.” Now they’re treated as pending, subject to a better option coming along. For people conditioned by years of marketing to confuse wants with needs, saving for retirement now feels like something that belonged to a time of company pensions and living within one’s means.

You likely think someone talking about future plans is naïve. Look at how the world has changed in just five years and consider what now dominates daily life that barely existed before.

ChatGPT, released on Nov. 30, 2022, is better at writing emails than you and I are. Relationships with longstanding American allies are being significantly damaged by U.S. President Donald Trump, contributing to higher consumer prices, labour-market disruption and deeper political divides. Social media platforms have become TikTokified, where fame comes from relevance rather than competence. Digital “stay-at-home” culture has reshaped work, socializing and entertainment, while worsening loneliness and eroding social skills. Even ordinary words like “peanut gallery” and “tribe” are now treated as suspect, making everyday communication anxious and exhausting.

In just five years, technological change has outpaced most university degrees. Today’s innovations become tomorrow’s museum pieces, turning long-term planning into something like building a sandcastle at high tide.

All this supposed “forward motion” and “progress” raises an uncomfortable question: who benefits from constantly shifting paradigms and moving goalposts while the rest of us are left operating in survival increments?

We expect the rug to be pulled out from under us at any moment, so we stop dreaming about what the future might hold and focus instead on making it to Friday still employed. We no longer assume that those who benefit, intentionally or not, from constant flux will slow things down long enough for people to adapt or find their footing. Right now, “the future” looks less like a destination and more like a series of steep cliffs we keep falling off without warning.

Industries, professions and companies disappear overnight. Rules change mid-game, often without notice. Education, credentials, skills and experience lose value faster than fruit left in the sun. Institutions contradict themselves without embarrassment. Effort no longer reliably leads to outcomes. Promises made in good faith are quietly abandoned as conditions shift.

We no longer say, “In five years I’d like to be doing [whatever].” We say, “Right now, I’m doing this.” Plans evaporate with the next update.

Talking about your future starts to feel like tempting fate, like painting the walls while the roof caves in. Long-term plans, at least for those with a romantic view of life, feel risky. Having a clear vision and sticking to it is treated less as a strength than a liability.

Long-term planning depends on predictable cause and effect, and that predictability is gone. Mapping out a five-year “hope for the future” plan feels pointless when the last few years resembled a software update nobody asked for. Bringing dreams to life requires spare mental energy, and most people are already running near capacity, bombarded by notifications that never include a decline button.

Not long ago, life was built around consistency, progression and delayed reward. Now it’s built around interruption, volatility and sudden resets.

Timelines no longer matter. Formulas like A + B + C = D for “guaranteed outcomes” belong to another era. Writing love letters to your future self makes little sense when your future isn’t writing back. Dreaming about what comes next, let alone preparing for it, feels futile.

The assumption of stability—stable careers, permanent relationships, linear progress—has largely collapsed. We’ve been trained to stop asking where we’re going and focus instead on where we are. Purpose gives way to paycheques and algorithms, and long-term thinking shrinks to whatever gets us through the moment.

That’s not a failure of imagination. It’s adaptation.

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job.


© Troy Media

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more