Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KOSSOVAN: Why nobody plans for the future anymore


By Nick Kossovan — February 2, 2026

Long-term plans assume stability. Right now, stability is the one thing people can’t count on


Have you noticed that nobody talks about the future anymore?

What’s there to say when hyper-technological change is wiping out professions and industries with no rebound in sight, geopolitical relationships once thought solid now feel like exposed raw nerves, and yesterday’s acceptable behaviour is today’s offence under the banner of “social progress”? Much of the angst I see and hear around me comes from not knowing what lies ahead.

A semblance of stability no longer exists. Government, employers and social values are changing faster than anyone can plan for, with no attachment to tomorrow and plenty of exit doors in sight. Everything feels short-term. As employees are increasingly viewed as liabilities, careers have become contracts with escape plans.

Marriages used to be understood as “forever.” Now they’re treated as pending, subject to a better option coming along. For people conditioned by years of marketing to confuse wants with needs, saving for retirement now feels like something that belonged to a time of company pensions and living within one’s means.

You likely think someone talking about future plans is naïve. Look at how the world has changed in just five years and consider what now dominates daily life that barely existed before.

ChatGPT, released on Nov. 30, 2022, is better at writing emails than you and I are. Relationships with longstanding American allies are being significantly damaged by U.S. President Donald Trump, contributing to higher consumer prices, labour-market disruption and deeper political divides. Social media platforms have become TikTokified, where fame comes from relevance rather than competence. Digital “stay-at-home” culture has reshaped work, socializing and entertainment, while worsening loneliness and eroding social skills. Even ordinary words like “peanut gallery” and “tribe” are now treated as suspect, making everyday communication anxious and exhausting.

In just five years, technological change has outpaced most university degrees. Today’s innovations become tomorrow’s museum pieces, turning long-term planning into something like building a sandcastle at high tide.

All this supposed “forward motion” and “progress” raises an uncomfortable question: who benefits from constantly shifting paradigms and moving goalposts while the rest of us are left operating in survival increments?

We expect the rug to be pulled out from under us at any moment, so we stop dreaming about what the future might hold and focus instead on making it to Friday still employed. We no longer assume that those who benefit, intentionally or not, from constant flux will slow things down long enough for people to adapt or find their footing. Right now, “the future” looks less like a destination and more like a series of steep cliffs we keep falling off without warning.

Industries, professions and companies disappear overnight. Rules change mid-game, often without notice. Education, credentials, skills and experience lose value faster than fruit left in the sun. Institutions contradict themselves without embarrassment. Effort no longer reliably leads to outcomes. Promises made in good faith are quietly abandoned as conditions shift.

We no longer say, “In five years I’d like to be doing [whatever].” We say, “Right now, I’m doing this.” Plans evaporate with the next update.

Talking about your future starts to feel like tempting fate, like painting the walls while the roof caves in. Long-term plans, at least for those with a romantic view of life, feel risky. Having a clear vision and sticking to it is treated less as a strength than a liability.

Long-term planning depends on predictable cause and effect, and that predictability is gone. Mapping out a five-year “hope for the future” plan feels pointless when the last few years resembled a software update nobody asked for. Bringing dreams to life requires spare mental energy, and most people are already running near capacity, bombarded by notifications that never include a decline button.

Not long ago, life was built around consistency, progression and delayed reward. Now it’s built around interruption, volatility and sudden resets.

Timelines no longer matter. Formulas like A + B + C = D for “guaranteed outcomes” belong to another era. Writing love letters to your future self makes little sense when your future isn’t writing back. Dreaming about what comes next, let alone preparing for it, feels futile.

The assumption of stability—stable careers, permanent relationships, linear progress—has largely collapsed. We’ve been trained to stop asking where we’re going and focus instead on where we are. Purpose gives way to paycheques and algorithms, and long-term thinking shrinks to whatever gets us through the moment.

That’s not a failure of imagination. It’s adaptation.

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job.


© Troy Media

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...

Labels

Show more