Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KOSSOVAN: Why nobody plans for the future anymore


By Nick Kossovan — February 2, 2026

Long-term plans assume stability. Right now, stability is the one thing people can’t count on


Have you noticed that nobody talks about the future anymore?

What’s there to say when hyper-technological change is wiping out professions and industries with no rebound in sight, geopolitical relationships once thought solid now feel like exposed raw nerves, and yesterday’s acceptable behaviour is today’s offence under the banner of “social progress”? Much of the angst I see and hear around me comes from not knowing what lies ahead.

A semblance of stability no longer exists. Government, employers and social values are changing faster than anyone can plan for, with no attachment to tomorrow and plenty of exit doors in sight. Everything feels short-term. As employees are increasingly viewed as liabilities, careers have become contracts with escape plans.

Marriages used to be understood as “forever.” Now they’re treated as pending, subject to a better option coming along. For people conditioned by years of marketing to confuse wants with needs, saving for retirement now feels like something that belonged to a time of company pensions and living within one’s means.

You likely think someone talking about future plans is naïve. Look at how the world has changed in just five years and consider what now dominates daily life that barely existed before.

ChatGPT, released on Nov. 30, 2022, is better at writing emails than you and I are. Relationships with longstanding American allies are being significantly damaged by U.S. President Donald Trump, contributing to higher consumer prices, labour-market disruption and deeper political divides. Social media platforms have become TikTokified, where fame comes from relevance rather than competence. Digital “stay-at-home” culture has reshaped work, socializing and entertainment, while worsening loneliness and eroding social skills. Even ordinary words like “peanut gallery” and “tribe” are now treated as suspect, making everyday communication anxious and exhausting.

In just five years, technological change has outpaced most university degrees. Today’s innovations become tomorrow’s museum pieces, turning long-term planning into something like building a sandcastle at high tide.

All this supposed “forward motion” and “progress” raises an uncomfortable question: who benefits from constantly shifting paradigms and moving goalposts while the rest of us are left operating in survival increments?

We expect the rug to be pulled out from under us at any moment, so we stop dreaming about what the future might hold and focus instead on making it to Friday still employed. We no longer assume that those who benefit, intentionally or not, from constant flux will slow things down long enough for people to adapt or find their footing. Right now, “the future” looks less like a destination and more like a series of steep cliffs we keep falling off without warning.

Industries, professions and companies disappear overnight. Rules change mid-game, often without notice. Education, credentials, skills and experience lose value faster than fruit left in the sun. Institutions contradict themselves without embarrassment. Effort no longer reliably leads to outcomes. Promises made in good faith are quietly abandoned as conditions shift.

We no longer say, “In five years I’d like to be doing [whatever].” We say, “Right now, I’m doing this.” Plans evaporate with the next update.

Talking about your future starts to feel like tempting fate, like painting the walls while the roof caves in. Long-term plans, at least for those with a romantic view of life, feel risky. Having a clear vision and sticking to it is treated less as a strength than a liability.

Long-term planning depends on predictable cause and effect, and that predictability is gone. Mapping out a five-year “hope for the future” plan feels pointless when the last few years resembled a software update nobody asked for. Bringing dreams to life requires spare mental energy, and most people are already running near capacity, bombarded by notifications that never include a decline button.

Not long ago, life was built around consistency, progression and delayed reward. Now it’s built around interruption, volatility and sudden resets.

Timelines no longer matter. Formulas like A + B + C = D for “guaranteed outcomes” belong to another era. Writing love letters to your future self makes little sense when your future isn’t writing back. Dreaming about what comes next, let alone preparing for it, feels futile.

The assumption of stability—stable careers, permanent relationships, linear progress—has largely collapsed. We’ve been trained to stop asking where we’re going and focus instead on where we are. Purpose gives way to paycheques and algorithms, and long-term thinking shrinks to whatever gets us through the moment.

That’s not a failure of imagination. It’s adaptation.

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job.


© Troy Media

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more