When I lived in Calgary my area of the city had a tradition at election time of having an all-candidates meeting where the candidates would bring pie, enough pie for all.
During the event there was the normal answering questions asked of everyone, or of specific candidates, but then there would be a break, and the attendees would try all the pies and judge who brought the best pie. It was a fun event and helped everyone see that no matter how different, we all liked pie.
One year we had six parties there - this is central Calgary, so we all know that only two of them really have a shot at winning - but for that night it doesn't matter, we'll get to hear everyone's platform. As I'm looking around the room, I realize one of the parties didn't bring pie.
The pie stations are all stet up at the back for during the first break when we go around and try them all, but one of the setups has no pie. They have their election material, but no pie. The three major parties all have pie, two of the minor parties had pie, but one of the minor parties didn't.
So, I'm listening to the candidates talk and hearing about their platform, and the party who didn't bring pie, I think it was the Christian Heritage Party or some offshoot of it, is taking several minutes longer answering their questions than their allowed time.
Okay, so that's two rules broken, no pie (the more egregious one IMO), and going over time. They get reminded of the time limit, and instead of saying "right we agreed to that rule" they say that following these rules is like living under fascism and the moderator is taking away their rights.
They finally relent and allow another candidate to answer the question.
Then it comes back to them for a question and rather than answering, they again complain about the event rules, and how oppressive they are, and ignore the request to stay on topic. In fact, their staff get out a silver tray with bibles on it. The moderator tells them that 1) their time is up 2) they are off topic and 3) the rules said they couldn't have props. The candidate calls the moderator a fascist, and his staff then start trying to hand out bibles to the people attending.
They're reminded that they are not allowed to hand out anything during the debate; everything has to be kept at their pie table for distribution during the break. In response two other staffers get out a banner proclaiming something about how true Christians need to rise up against this fascism.
As the candidate is ranting about how evil everyone else is, the moderator has the microphone cut. The candidate doesn't stop, he's now yelling, his staff trying to hand out the bibles are yelling (because people aren't accepting them), and the moderator calls a break for us all to go try the pie.
The candidate continues to yell at everyone as they turn their backs on him and go to try the pies. And the pies were delicious.
The yelling candidate has finally stopped yelling, but he and his staff are now taking over all the mic spots, which leads the moderator to announce they won't have the second half of the questions. Instead, everyone can go and talk with the candidates of their choice.
At this point the police are called, not to arrest the candidate, but to make sure that his staff stop harassing people who are trying to talk with each other or the other candidates.
So, what does this have to do with echo chambers?
If someone refuses to follow the rules they agree to, so as to be part of a space or to follow social conventions, there is usually a reason. And that reason is because they have no interest in hearing others, only in being heard. They are not interested in communion with others, but domination of them.
If you have conventions, or expectations, for participation to encourage community, then allowing the person to break the conventions means you will not be able to have your community.
And that candidate is the perfect example. (side note, their party was never invited back).
They were rude, broke the rules, harassed attendees, and had no interest in allowing anyone but them the ability to speak. But, and this is key, the absolute worst thing ...they didn't bring pie.
They signaled from the beginning that their goal was not participation in community.
It's not about "echo chambers", it's about identifying people who don't want to participate in your community and stopping them from breaking it.
And, if you ever worry that you're doing something wrong, just remember ... If someone didn't bring pie, they don't get to participate in the pie bringing event.
Comments
Post a Comment