Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: Liberals tower over Conservatives by 15 points, Mainstreet Research

Mainstreet polled Canadians from January 31st until end of day Monday, February 2, 2026 and got results that more or less confirmed what Leger and Liaison saw in their polls: the Liberals are surging, the Conservatives are either stagnant or sinking.
 
When we have three polls saying basically the same thing we have a trend and we don't ignore trends. Party campaign staff do not ignore these trends either. They watch them carefully.
 
The numbers I am covering here are the all voters, and not the decided and leaning voters only categories from the poll. The latter is actually worse for the Conservatives. These are the, if you can call them that, better numbers.
  
NATIONAL NUMBERS: The current standings, nationally are as follows:
  • 48% Liberal Party of Canada
  • 34% Conservative Party of Canada
  • 4% New Democratic Party of Canada
  • 5% Bloc Quebecois
  • 2% Green Party
 
REGIONAL NUMBERS:
The Liberals lead in every region except the Prairie provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. In British Columbia they lead 45.8% to 34.7% for the Conservatives. They have a near 25 point lead in Ontario over the Conservatives. They lead the Bloc Quebecois 42.9% to 25.5%. Finally in Atlantic Canada they lead the Conservatives 72.1% to 18.1%.  

The gender and age demographics aren't any better. I won't cover all of these, as it just is redundant, but here's the highlights. The Liberals lead in every age group except the 35-49 and even there the Conservative lead is 0.4%. Among the 65+ group the Liberals lead 58% to 25.9%.  

When it comes to gender it is a statistical tie among men, and the Liberals hold a 54.9% to 28.8% lead among women over the Conservatives.

HOW THE LEADERS FARE:
Mark Carney has an overall approval rating of 66% and a disapproval of 33% or a net approval of 33 points. Pierre Poilievre has an approval rating of 42% with a disapproval of 54% or a net approval of -12 points. 

That's bad.  

It should be noted that 3 in 4 Canadians read or viewed Mark Carney's Davos' speech, and 76% of them said it made them view the Prime Minister much more favorably, or somewhat more favorably. The negative view on that was a mere 22%.  

DIRECTION OF THE COUNTRY:
When asked is Canada going in the right direction we have 54% saying yes, while 35% say no.

The trade and other agreements with China:
This was polled as well and the talks and subsequent agreements were viewed favorably by 67% of those polled with 28% being against them.

The lesson for the Liberals:
If this poll tells the Liberals anything it is as follows: let Mark Carney do what he's been doing because the public loves him and what he is doing.  There have been fears that Carney is spending a lot of time traveling to other countries like China, Qatar, the EU, and so forth. Yet, in all of those trips he's been doing government business talking trade, security agreements, and investment opportunities in Canada for foreign companies. The public clearly approves of that.  

The lesson for the Conservatives:
Last fall the Conservatives continued their policy of obstructing committees with filibusters, and procedural gimmicks to bring much of Parliament's work to a standstill. A good example of that was the stalled bail reform bill. It sat at committee for weeks not moving. That was also widely reported on and it made the Conservatives look unprofessional.

Here's what the public wants from the Conservatives: do your job as Members of Parliament and that means moving things though the Commons on a timely schedule. By all means critique things, provide amendments, but if you still don't get your way you have to accept it. Holding up the work of Parliament isn't something people want.

Two weeks ago Pierre Poilievre said he was now, finally, willing to work with the Liberals to move some bills through committees to come to votes.  

My View:
My view is that the public, a large segment of it at least wants Parliament to work as it was intended. They want to the legislation moving through from first reading, second reading, committees, and then third reading in a timely fashion.  

There is a legitimate time for obstructionism. That time is when an unpopular government puts forward terrible legislation that will result in genuine harm.  That's not happening right now.  

Regardless, the Conservatives approach to the Commons and the public has been a clear miss. With multiple polling firms showing them trailing the Liberals and losing ground they cannot continue doing what they have been doing.

The only good news from any of the polls is that Canadians by large majority do not want an election this year.

If one was held today, the Conservatives would be well under 80 elected MPs. The Liberals would be around 250.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more