Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: Liberals tower over Conservatives by 15 points, Mainstreet Research

Mainstreet polled Canadians from January 31st until end of day Monday, February 2, 2026 and got results that more or less confirmed what Leger and Liaison saw in their polls: the Liberals are surging, the Conservatives are either stagnant or sinking.
 
When we have three polls saying basically the same thing we have a trend and we don't ignore trends. Party campaign staff do not ignore these trends either. They watch them carefully.
 
The numbers I am covering here are the all voters, and not the decided and leaning voters only categories from the poll. The latter is actually worse for the Conservatives. These are the, if you can call them that, better numbers.
  
NATIONAL NUMBERS: The current standings, nationally are as follows:
  • 48% Liberal Party of Canada
  • 34% Conservative Party of Canada
  • 4% New Democratic Party of Canada
  • 5% Bloc Quebecois
  • 2% Green Party
 
REGIONAL NUMBERS:
The Liberals lead in every region except the Prairie provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. In British Columbia they lead 45.8% to 34.7% for the Conservatives. They have a near 25 point lead in Ontario over the Conservatives. They lead the Bloc Quebecois 42.9% to 25.5%. Finally in Atlantic Canada they lead the Conservatives 72.1% to 18.1%.  

The gender and age demographics aren't any better. I won't cover all of these, as it just is redundant, but here's the highlights. The Liberals lead in every age group except the 35-49 and even there the Conservative lead is 0.4%. Among the 65+ group the Liberals lead 58% to 25.9%.  

When it comes to gender it is a statistical tie among men, and the Liberals hold a 54.9% to 28.8% lead among women over the Conservatives.

HOW THE LEADERS FARE:
Mark Carney has an overall approval rating of 66% and a disapproval of 33% or a net approval of 33 points. Pierre Poilievre has an approval rating of 42% with a disapproval of 54% or a net approval of -12 points. 

That's bad.  

It should be noted that 3 in 4 Canadians read or viewed Mark Carney's Davos' speech, and 76% of them said it made them view the Prime Minister much more favorably, or somewhat more favorably. The negative view on that was a mere 22%.  

DIRECTION OF THE COUNTRY:
When asked is Canada going in the right direction we have 54% saying yes, while 35% say no.

The trade and other agreements with China:
This was polled as well and the talks and subsequent agreements were viewed favorably by 67% of those polled with 28% being against them.

The lesson for the Liberals:
If this poll tells the Liberals anything it is as follows: let Mark Carney do what he's been doing because the public loves him and what he is doing.  There have been fears that Carney is spending a lot of time traveling to other countries like China, Qatar, the EU, and so forth. Yet, in all of those trips he's been doing government business talking trade, security agreements, and investment opportunities in Canada for foreign companies. The public clearly approves of that.  

The lesson for the Conservatives:
Last fall the Conservatives continued their policy of obstructing committees with filibusters, and procedural gimmicks to bring much of Parliament's work to a standstill. A good example of that was the stalled bail reform bill. It sat at committee for weeks not moving. That was also widely reported on and it made the Conservatives look unprofessional.

Here's what the public wants from the Conservatives: do your job as Members of Parliament and that means moving things though the Commons on a timely schedule. By all means critique things, provide amendments, but if you still don't get your way you have to accept it. Holding up the work of Parliament isn't something people want.

Two weeks ago Pierre Poilievre said he was now, finally, willing to work with the Liberals to move some bills through committees to come to votes.  

My View:
My view is that the public, a large segment of it at least wants Parliament to work as it was intended. They want to the legislation moving through from first reading, second reading, committees, and then third reading in a timely fashion.  

There is a legitimate time for obstructionism. That time is when an unpopular government puts forward terrible legislation that will result in genuine harm.  That's not happening right now.  

Regardless, the Conservatives approach to the Commons and the public has been a clear miss. With multiple polling firms showing them trailing the Liberals and losing ground they cannot continue doing what they have been doing.

The only good news from any of the polls is that Canadians by large majority do not want an election this year.

If one was held today, the Conservatives would be well under 80 elected MPs. The Liberals would be around 250.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more