Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Conservatives Scott Anderson says, “Limiting the use of experts, to reduce costs and delays in motor vehicle disputes, is just is nibbling around the edges of ICBC’s real problem”


BC Attorney Genera, David Eby

Yesterday, David Eby’s Ministry of the Attorney General announced changes to court rules which he says will help bring balance between reducing legal costs and the ability of British Columbians injured in motor vehicle accidents to receive the medical benefits and settlements they need to recover from their injuries.



 “The intent of these reforms is to avoid the costs and delays associated with the disproportionate use of experts and reports that we are seeing used today … without removing access to further expertise in situations where it’s necessary”, Eby is quoted as stating.



Attorney General Eby continued, “These changes are meant to encourage greater use of court-appointed, or joint experts, to provide a more neutral expert opinion and assist the court in determining appropriate amounts for injury claims.”



It seems then, that the Ministry is trusting that amendments to the Supreme Court Civil Rules Regulation, will put a stop to the disproportionate use of experts and expert reports, which are currently being used in ICBC motor vehicle-related court cases.  The new process has been designed to encourage earlier settlements, thereby reducing the costs of settling vehicle injury claims.



However, BC Conservative Party Interim Leader was quick in his response:
I would say that limiting parties to the use of one expert, makes it hard to mount a claim if the claim is for unrelated damages.  A prime example would be if someone is in an accident, and seeks both physical and psychological damages.”.




BC Conservative Party Interim leader Scott Anderson
This should be concerning”, continued Anderson.  

 “The governments proposed amendments state that they are meant to” …  limit the number of experts and expert reports permitted to address the issue of damages, such as wage loss, future wage loss and future care that can be used by each side of a motor vehicle dispute …



How is a Doctor of medicine equipped to speak to psychological issues, and vice versa?”, questioned the Conservatives Scott Anderson.



These changes, according to the Attorney Generals Ministry, will be applied at the beginning next February, to all ICBC personal injury claims, subject to further analysis and consultation which the ministry plans to undertake.



Anderson’s response on that however was succinct:
I applaud the sentiment but the execution is faulty. In any event, this is nibbling around the edges of the real problem ICBC faces; the ability of governments to loot the corporation.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more