Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Conservatives Scott Anderson says, “Limiting the use of experts, to reduce costs and delays in motor vehicle disputes, is just is nibbling around the edges of ICBC’s real problem”


BC Attorney Genera, David Eby

Yesterday, David Eby’s Ministry of the Attorney General announced changes to court rules which he says will help bring balance between reducing legal costs and the ability of British Columbians injured in motor vehicle accidents to receive the medical benefits and settlements they need to recover from their injuries.



 “The intent of these reforms is to avoid the costs and delays associated with the disproportionate use of experts and reports that we are seeing used today … without removing access to further expertise in situations where it’s necessary”, Eby is quoted as stating.



Attorney General Eby continued, “These changes are meant to encourage greater use of court-appointed, or joint experts, to provide a more neutral expert opinion and assist the court in determining appropriate amounts for injury claims.”



It seems then, that the Ministry is trusting that amendments to the Supreme Court Civil Rules Regulation, will put a stop to the disproportionate use of experts and expert reports, which are currently being used in ICBC motor vehicle-related court cases.  The new process has been designed to encourage earlier settlements, thereby reducing the costs of settling vehicle injury claims.



However, BC Conservative Party Interim Leader was quick in his response:
I would say that limiting parties to the use of one expert, makes it hard to mount a claim if the claim is for unrelated damages.  A prime example would be if someone is in an accident, and seeks both physical and psychological damages.”.




BC Conservative Party Interim leader Scott Anderson
This should be concerning”, continued Anderson.  

 “The governments proposed amendments state that they are meant to” …  limit the number of experts and expert reports permitted to address the issue of damages, such as wage loss, future wage loss and future care that can be used by each side of a motor vehicle dispute …



How is a Doctor of medicine equipped to speak to psychological issues, and vice versa?”, questioned the Conservatives Scott Anderson.



These changes, according to the Attorney Generals Ministry, will be applied at the beginning next February, to all ICBC personal injury claims, subject to further analysis and consultation which the ministry plans to undertake.



Anderson’s response on that however was succinct:
I applaud the sentiment but the execution is faulty. In any event, this is nibbling around the edges of the real problem ICBC faces; the ability of governments to loot the corporation.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more