Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Over two years of government assurances that ‘all is well’ have worn thin. Evidence is mounting that the government has a major mess on its hands


From the Toronto Star ~~ Friday February 8, 2019

In September, about a month after quitting the Conservative Party, Bernier founded the People’s Party of Canada. Pundits and rival politicians dismissed it as a vanity project, the product of Bernier’s bitterness after having lost the Conservative leadership to Andrew Scheer in 2017.

But in just four months, the PPC signed up more than 33,000 members and has become a thorn in the side of Scheer and the Conservative Party, which has been forced to protect its right flank on issues like immigration and identity. More importantly, the PPC now has electoral district associations in every one of the country’s 338 federal ridings. Considering the party was little more than an angry Twitter feed last fall, the speed of PPC’s rise is notable.

Bernier declined through a spokesperson to speak to the Star for this story, but has said he wants
nothing to do with white nationalists. “Racists are not welcome in this party,” he told Montreal radio station CJAD in December.



Lumping together ‘neo-Nazis’, the ‘alt-right’ and ‘far-right’ -- while leaving out radicals from the lunatic left -- is hardly fair and balanced. Contending that this ‘problem’ is confined to Max Bernier and his People’s Party is ludicrous.  

The “far-right” (and left) has been around for decades. The ‘far-right’ is a handy label for anyone who disagrees with liberal / left / socialist views and is used so often and indiscriminately it has lost meaning. There are extremists in all sectors of the political spectrum.

Extremists try to align themselves with any federal and provincial politician, or party, that might give them voice. No one is immune. Their following is too small to form a political movement, so they try to find a home within an existing party and work within it. The PPC is no more vulnerable than any other political party.


The innuendoes and slander are underway. Bernier and his People’s Party are making the political elite nervous. They have no leverage and no way to control a new political rival. What is most worrisome for the establishment is Bernier’s departure from traditional political party structure.

Political parties are protecting their turf, and the coming election will be a test of their hold over the electorate. We are already bombarded with the usual election year bombast. Fixed election dates have rendered the normal six-week formal election period meaningless ... except for Elections Canada and Elections Act purposes. The campaign is underway and will intensify over the next the next 8 months.

It is too early to predict what impact the People’s Party will have on the October election, but one thing is clear. Electors are offered a new alternative; election campaigns will never be the same again. The dynamics are changing and will not revert to what we have seen in the past.

A new factor in this election is the government’s failure to clarify immigration policy coupled with a failure to communicate with the public on immigration matters. That creates a caldron of potential for misunderstanding and fear.

Concerns over irresponsible immigration policies do not make a person an extremist.

Over two years of government assurances that ‘all is well’ have worn thin. Evidence is mounting that the government has a major mess on its hands, is not dealing with it responsibly and is not open and honest about the immigration portfolio.

The building SNC-Lavalin scandal is similarly uncomfortable.

An honest government would have squelched the allegations of interference in judicial affairs immediately. Instead we are faced with a tight-lipped: “Nothing to see here, folks. Move on please.”

That is unacceptable.

As more information comes to light, the stench is growing. Why were amendments to the Criminal Code embodied in a financial Act? Why did the change escape scrutiny of the House of Commons Justice Committee?   

Independence of our elected representatives is a key element in a representative democracy. When representatives are constrained by the political party they are associated with, we no longer enjoy a free democracy.

The People’s Party offers to allow member independence and to put every issue up for discussion and debate. That may resonate with thousands of electors who are uncomfortable with having their representatives follow party orders rather than representing their interests.   
  
           
John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

  1. This should make the CPC in BC (that sleeps with fiberals) think before they stick a knife in the back of the BC Conservative Party again. TIME to UNITE the RIGHT. It is hard to have respect for Bernier, just a sore looser -- not a teem player. Don Purdey

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more