Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FIONA FAMULAK: By wielding a legislative hammer to bring in an unjustifiable policy for the construction industry, Premier John Horgan’s government is implementing a solution that is looking for a problem


Reprinted with the approval of the Vancouver Regional Construction Association
** First published in the Province Newspaper Feb 24th


Preying on fear and pulling on the public’s heart strings will never make a prescriptive and regressive policy a good public policy.

Yet, that’s exactly what the NDP government and B.C. Building Trades unions are doing as they work to sell voters on the need to build key infrastructure projects under a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA).

Between them, they are touting benefits such as good-paying local jobs, increased hiring of women and Aboriginal workers, quotas for apprenticeship training, and labour peace as reasons to support the CBA.

While our association supports creating opportunities for women, Aboriginal workers and under-represented groups, the Vancouver Regional Construction Association does not support this CBA because of the way it was negotiated, the way it’s being rolled out, and its potential impact on the construction industry and B.C. taxpayers.

That’s not a partisan criticism of an NDP policy. As an independent, non-partisan organization representing both union and open-shop companies, we would make the same statement regardless of which political party is in power.

Our issue is that this CBA is an exclusive agreement between two signatories — the provincial government’s Crown corporation and the select trade unions. There was a lack of full industry consultation during its negotiation.

It includes an embedded project labour agreement, requiring all tradesmen and tradeswomen working on a CBA project to join the prescribed union and all companies working on CBA projects to secure their labour from the Crown corporation.

We are not concerned about who builds B.C.’s infrastructure — union and open-shop construction companies have successfully engaged each other for construction services for decades — but rather how it gets done.

Sadly, the rationale for the labour agreements is based on assumptions that don’t hold true.


It starts with the notion there are large, untapped pools of workers looking for jobs in the construction industry. While these pools exist, they are not to the extent needed for the construction industry to meet the demand for skilled labour in the coming years.

B.C.’s construction industry needs to attract 14,600 additional workers to meet peak market demand between 2019 and 2021. Over the next decade, it will need to attract 25,000 new workers to keep pace with demand and retirements.

Finding new workers will not be easy.

B.C.’s unemployment rate last month almost equals the lowest rate recorded in the past 40 years. At 4.6 per cent, our unemployment rate is close to what economists refer to as “full employment.” This means there is a scarcity of job seekers in B.C., and with only one in every 45 students entering a construction trade program out of high school, we need a strategy to grow our skilled workforce.

The project labour agreement will not grow our workforce. Instead, it will move skilled workers from their current employers to the new Crown corporation, leaving those employers with the challenge of rebuilding their workforce. In simple terms, the agreement will rob Peter to pay Paul. Our members tell us this is starting — B.C. Building Trades’ representatives are already trying to poach workers from construction sites.

The agreement also presumes that unions should be the source of industry training and ignores the apprenticeship programs that many union and open-shop construction employers already have in place. Our members recognize that an ongoing commitment to training and apprenticeship development is essential to sustaining a skilled workforce over the long term. Had industry been consulted, we would have explored what more we could do to reach the government’s targets for apprenticeship training.

Industry would have also talked about the efforts already underway to increase recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in the current construction labour force, including women, Indigenous workers and new Canadians.

Another assumption that doesn’t hold true is the B.C. Building Trades’ claim that the project labour agreement is needed to ensure construction of the Pattullo Bridge or widening of the Trans-Canada Highway is not disrupted by strikes. The truth is, the construction industry has enjoyed labour peace for more than 30 years.

With regards to how the project labour agreement is being rolled out, we have serious concerns about the lack of details coming from B.C. Infrastructure Benefits Inc. — the Crown corporation created as the employer and source of labour for CBA projects.

Construction companies need to know how the labour agreement will work operationally. If they don’t have the details, they will be forced to submit their bid without a complete understanding of project risk — if they choose to bid at all. Either scenario can only drive up the cost of construction.

There are numerous opportunities for industry and government to work together to achieve our mutually held goals. However, so far, government has opted to go it alone and negotiate a deal excluding a key stakeholder — construction employers.

By wielding a legislative hammer to bring in an unjustifiable policy for the construction industry, Premier John Horgan’s government is implementing a solution that is looking for a problem. It’s why the Vancouver Regional Construction Association has joined a coalition of like-minded business organizations to challenge the policy in court. British Columbians deserve better.




Fiona Famulak is president of the Vancouver Regional Construction Association (VRCA), the largest construction association in B.C. 

The VRCA represents union and non-union general contractors, trade contractors, manufacturers, suppliers and professionals working in the construction industry.




NOTE:  Coalition asks the B.C. Supreme Court to strike down the Project Labour Agreement contained in B.C.’s Community Benefits Agreement

To read the full release CLICK HERE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more