Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FIONA FAMULAK: By wielding a legislative hammer to bring in an unjustifiable policy for the construction industry, Premier John Horgan’s government is implementing a solution that is looking for a problem


Reprinted with the approval of the Vancouver Regional Construction Association
** First published in the Province Newspaper Feb 24th


Preying on fear and pulling on the public’s heart strings will never make a prescriptive and regressive policy a good public policy.

Yet, that’s exactly what the NDP government and B.C. Building Trades unions are doing as they work to sell voters on the need to build key infrastructure projects under a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA).

Between them, they are touting benefits such as good-paying local jobs, increased hiring of women and Aboriginal workers, quotas for apprenticeship training, and labour peace as reasons to support the CBA.

While our association supports creating opportunities for women, Aboriginal workers and under-represented groups, the Vancouver Regional Construction Association does not support this CBA because of the way it was negotiated, the way it’s being rolled out, and its potential impact on the construction industry and B.C. taxpayers.

That’s not a partisan criticism of an NDP policy. As an independent, non-partisan organization representing both union and open-shop companies, we would make the same statement regardless of which political party is in power.

Our issue is that this CBA is an exclusive agreement between two signatories — the provincial government’s Crown corporation and the select trade unions. There was a lack of full industry consultation during its negotiation.

It includes an embedded project labour agreement, requiring all tradesmen and tradeswomen working on a CBA project to join the prescribed union and all companies working on CBA projects to secure their labour from the Crown corporation.

We are not concerned about who builds B.C.’s infrastructure — union and open-shop construction companies have successfully engaged each other for construction services for decades — but rather how it gets done.

Sadly, the rationale for the labour agreements is based on assumptions that don’t hold true.


It starts with the notion there are large, untapped pools of workers looking for jobs in the construction industry. While these pools exist, they are not to the extent needed for the construction industry to meet the demand for skilled labour in the coming years.

B.C.’s construction industry needs to attract 14,600 additional workers to meet peak market demand between 2019 and 2021. Over the next decade, it will need to attract 25,000 new workers to keep pace with demand and retirements.

Finding new workers will not be easy.

B.C.’s unemployment rate last month almost equals the lowest rate recorded in the past 40 years. At 4.6 per cent, our unemployment rate is close to what economists refer to as “full employment.” This means there is a scarcity of job seekers in B.C., and with only one in every 45 students entering a construction trade program out of high school, we need a strategy to grow our skilled workforce.

The project labour agreement will not grow our workforce. Instead, it will move skilled workers from their current employers to the new Crown corporation, leaving those employers with the challenge of rebuilding their workforce. In simple terms, the agreement will rob Peter to pay Paul. Our members tell us this is starting — B.C. Building Trades’ representatives are already trying to poach workers from construction sites.

The agreement also presumes that unions should be the source of industry training and ignores the apprenticeship programs that many union and open-shop construction employers already have in place. Our members recognize that an ongoing commitment to training and apprenticeship development is essential to sustaining a skilled workforce over the long term. Had industry been consulted, we would have explored what more we could do to reach the government’s targets for apprenticeship training.

Industry would have also talked about the efforts already underway to increase recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in the current construction labour force, including women, Indigenous workers and new Canadians.

Another assumption that doesn’t hold true is the B.C. Building Trades’ claim that the project labour agreement is needed to ensure construction of the Pattullo Bridge or widening of the Trans-Canada Highway is not disrupted by strikes. The truth is, the construction industry has enjoyed labour peace for more than 30 years.

With regards to how the project labour agreement is being rolled out, we have serious concerns about the lack of details coming from B.C. Infrastructure Benefits Inc. — the Crown corporation created as the employer and source of labour for CBA projects.

Construction companies need to know how the labour agreement will work operationally. If they don’t have the details, they will be forced to submit their bid without a complete understanding of project risk — if they choose to bid at all. Either scenario can only drive up the cost of construction.

There are numerous opportunities for industry and government to work together to achieve our mutually held goals. However, so far, government has opted to go it alone and negotiate a deal excluding a key stakeholder — construction employers.

By wielding a legislative hammer to bring in an unjustifiable policy for the construction industry, Premier John Horgan’s government is implementing a solution that is looking for a problem. It’s why the Vancouver Regional Construction Association has joined a coalition of like-minded business organizations to challenge the policy in court. British Columbians deserve better.




Fiona Famulak is president of the Vancouver Regional Construction Association (VRCA), the largest construction association in B.C. 

The VRCA represents union and non-union general contractors, trade contractors, manufacturers, suppliers and professionals working in the construction industry.




NOTE:  Coalition asks the B.C. Supreme Court to strike down the Project Labour Agreement contained in B.C.’s Community Benefits Agreement

To read the full release CLICK HERE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more