Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Why are lobbyists given apparent open access to government, when members of the public and legitimate public groups can’t get a foot in the door?


Reading accounts of alleged attempts to interfere with criminal charges against SNC-Lavalin, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s denials of ‘giving any orders’ to the Solicitor General, I could not help but recall Trudeau’s denials following news of his family holiday stay at the Aga Khan’s private island.

Trudeau saw no difficulty in accepting a free vacation from a lobbyist who received substantial funding from the government, claiming that family friendship trumped all ethical concerns.

The ethics commissioner disagreed.

Trudeau has little sense of ethical impropriety. He does business with others as if he has no governance obligations to remain neutral, or to be responsible to the public.

79 meetings with senior government officials and SNC-Lavalin on one issue?

Why are lobbyists given apparent open access to government, when members of the public and legitimate public groups can’t get a foot in the door? Why is this heavy-handed influence on governance decisions allowed?

Governance must be in the best interests of Canadians, not in the best interests of business, cartels, industry and the media.

Instead, our federal government is increasingly acting in place of Canadians rather than for Canadians.


Why are drug companies allowed to lobby Health Canada?  Why does Crown-Indigenous Relations not consult with Canadians who bear the expenses? We are part of the Crown-Indigenous equation. The government acts on our behalf, not in place of us.

Decisions taken without consultation or respect for the impact on our lives is unacceptable.

I don’t care what the government objective in imposing a new (carbon) tax on gasoline and heating fuel is, when that is done without respect for its impact on my meager pension income. It limits my activities and freedoms without justification. Thousands of others will be harder hit as they have to continue commuting to work or need a vehicle to earn a living. Farmers with huge investments in land and equipment can’t shut down their tractors and their increased costs will work their way up the chain (with added costs at each level) to higher costs at the supermarket.

The federal government is not empowered to make decisions on pipelines, without consulting with the people it serves.

Municipalities, provinces and self-proclaimed environmental groups can get their knickers in a knot, but they do not represent Canada or more than a tiny fraction of Canadians.

The notion that vociferous protest groups and lobbyist, have the ear of government, and can influence policy to the detriment of the majority, is an unacceptable repudiation of the oath our members of parliament swear when they take office. 
   
Sunny days, sunny ways have turned out to be irresponsible lunacy.
 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


PLEASE NOTE ... you may wish to read the following story, “On SNC-Lavalin, Conservatives will pursue every course of action to make sure Justin Trudeau and his office are held to account”, which was posted to the blog late yesterday afternoon

CLICK HERE
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more