Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PECKFORD: The public interest is for the elected. The clerk advises the elected. End of story. The clerk erred.


Today we welcome a regular on Merv Unger’s www.nanaimonet.com ... former Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Brian Peckford.  We’ll be sharing some of his commentaries on a regular basis right here ... hope you enjoy them.





This is not complicated, notwithstanding those many who want to make it so. As I hinted in an earlier column, I suspected a major damage-control action by the federal Liberal Government.

And we got the first blow from the Clerk of the Privy Council.

The clerk is a Deputy Minister; supposedly non-partisan; providing policy advice to the Prime Minister and Cabinet. He is also secretary to the Cabinet.

He is not in the Prime Minister Office; he is in the Privy Council Office. C’est la difference.

Political advice is the purview of the PMO.

Now many want to spin this and split hairs to somehow have it that the clerk was just carrying out his duties when he essentially intervened. No way.

Listen: SNC Lavalin applied for an exemption under the recently-passed amendment to the criminal code surreptitiously inserted in a budget bill, for which they lobbied.

OK it was passed and is the law. The Director of Prosecutions received the application and made a decision as to whether SNC Lavalin qualified to be considered for such an exemption. The Director decided that SNC Lavalin did not qualify. And, as I understand it, the Minister supported that decision.

That’s should have been the end of it – nada, finis, done, over! 

In my ten years as Premier no such decisions made by the Director of Prosecutions came to my office, or my office to that department. I never once discussed such matters with the minister or he/she with me. It was off limits.

So this “business “carried in the CBC article about the clerk of Privy Council (in my terms clerk of executive council) contacting the Minister about a matter decided or before the Director of Prosecutions is absurd. That the CBC would try to justify this with an anonymous source as I said in my last column is ridiculous.

This is not the Clerk’s job! He overstepped his bounds. And to go on and say the Clerk had to protect the public interest is outlandish, outside his mandate, and responsibilities.

Anyway, the matter of jobs etc. is not the issue. The issue is whether the application met the conditions of the Act. Competent, independent officials said it did not.

The public interest is for the elected. The clerk advises the elected. End of story. The clerk erred.

If the Government of Canada still wants to assist SNC Lavalin they should do the honorable thing and present to Parliament further amendments to the Criminal Code dealing with remediation agreements.

Of course, they cannot do this now with all the furor. Too bad.

Case closed? Not quite. Closed as it relates to the present decision by the Director of Prosecution but not closed in that those in the Government who tried to exert influence must be held accountable.

The mere incident of the PM meeting with the Minister and discussing this type of matter was wrong and undoubtedly approving that the clerk talk to the Minister is also wrong. 


Former Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Brian Peckford writes regularly on Nanaimonet.com.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more