Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Canada’s election system works, but fewer of us are voting. Here’s what’s at stake when you don’t show up (Troy Media)


Canada is now in the midst of a federal election campaign. Candidates and political parties are filling our ears, eyes and minds with reasons to vote for them—or at least not for the other guy. Advance polls have already opened.

It’s time to go and vote. But will we?

According to Elections Canada, less than two-thirds of eligible federal voters have cast a ballot in any election so far this century. Turnout has steadily declined in recent decades, driven by voter apathy, disillusionment with politics and a sense that individual votes don’t make a difference. Cynics ask, “Why vote? The government always gets in.”

We should vote because we can. Millions around the world live under regimes where elections are neither free nor fair, if they’re held at all. In many places, people live in fear of what unelected despots might do to them.

In Canada, we have real choices. Our ballots aren’t a sham featuring a single candidate while opposition leaders sit in jail—or worse. Some countries maintain the fiction that their governments enjoy 99 per cent support, but their citizens never had a choice to begin with.

Even if “the government always gets in,” elections still matter. They give us a chance to support a government we like, or to vote for change if we’re not happy. We can hold leaders accountable and, when needed, kick the bums out. That’s a privilege many others around the world can only dream of.

Election day in Canada is peaceful, accessible and orderly. Our voting process protects secrecy, and unlike in many countries, Canadians need not fear punishment for choosing the “wrong” candidate.

Another reason to vote: our elections work. Yes, some results are disputed, and yes, recounts happen. But Canadians trust that ballots will be properly counted, that boxes won’t be stuffed or stolen, and that those who win the most support will form the next government. That trust is a cornerstone of our democracy.

In Canada, elections are followed by peaceful, polite transitions of power. In too many other places, elections spark violence or rebellion. The 2021 riot that followed Joe Biden’s election to the U.S. presidency—when supporters of Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol—was a jarring reminder that even long-standing democracies are not immune to breakdowns when people refuse to accept legitimate results.

Elections also help us engage. They push us to consider what’s working—and what’s not—in our country, and to seek out candidates who reflect our views. It’s a moment to think big and influence Canada’s direction, even in a small way. For first-time voters or newcomers to Canada, participating in an election is a meaningful way to take part in shaping our future.

We should never say our vote doesn’t count. Too many Americans skipped their last presidential election, wrongly assuming their state’s outcome was a foregone conclusion. They’ll likely show up next time, having learned that assumption can carry consequences.

On a more personal note, voting feels good. It connects us to our neighbours and our community. We can volunteer for candidates, work at polling stations or simply show up and proudly wear an “I voted” sticker to encourage others to do the same. That sense of participation is real and rewarding.

And there’s one last reason to vote, uniquely Canadian and undeniably persuasive: If you don’t vote, you forfeit your right to complain about the government.


Dr. Roslyn Kunin is a respected Canadian economist known for her extensive work in economic forecasting, public policy, and labour market analysis. She has held various prominent roles, including serving as the regional director for the federal government’s Department of Employment and Immigration in British Columbia and Yukon and as an adjunct professor at the University of British Columbia. Dr. Kunin is also recognized for her contributions to economic development, particularly in Western Canada.

© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more