Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

STAMER: Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?


This morning, I came across a news article with concerns and comments from Powell River Mayor Ron Woznow, about the forest industry getting enough fibre – especially, ‘at least 45 million cubic metres of economically viable fibre for the 2025 calendar year.’

His concerns, echo what everyone else is saying.

First the provincial government gave us “the promise of 45” -- then it was “the drive to 45” – and now, apparently, it’s “the path to 45”.

Really, are we even going to get close to 45?  The budget from BC’s Finance Minister says 30 … so really? How are they going to get to 45? 

There’s no plan, no real engagement, no business support, no nothing … and no path forward to get there.

Woznow also went on to say that 'economic activity isn’t occurring because of the significant addition of regulations. It affects small businesses, it affects contractors, and so this motion is to let the minister of forests know that there is an opportunity to move forward and to have faith in the chief forester.'

Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?

The reality is, and as we said as a party, we need to be able to determine, with our First Nations, with our community forests, with our licensees, on exactly what is sustainable.  And where are we going to be able to actually harvest on a regular basis? 

Not only that, but we’re going to be including fuel reduction across the province.

Forest Minister Ravi Parmar has agreed, on the record, that we should be removing trees in all areas of the province, including protected areas. He’s already on record saying that.  We all know that we need to protect our forests and provincial parks, and our protected areas -- so, what’s the comprehensive plan?

Let me ask this.  In Revelstoke, BC Timber Sales just took out available fibre for Caribou habitat, but we don’t actual know how much land will be taken out.  Again, to say you’re going to get to 45, but then you keep removing these areas from being harvested, what are we going to have left?

We have to really be able to sit down and come up with a province-wide plan, not just a band-aid solution because a band-aid solution is making it harder and harder for us to have a sustainable forest industry.

Sweden has a sustainable model that harvests over 100 million cubic metres of timber a year, on a land mass smaller than BC! And we can only do 30? That just shows the mismanagement that this NDP government has done to our forest industry over the past eight years.

We’ve gone from logging 50 million cubic metres to just 30. We’ve lost a third of forestry jobs in the past forty-eight months. And in that same time period the provincial treasury has lost seventy-five percent of direct revenue it previously received from the forest industry.

That’s shocking! 

It’s not just global and it’s not just the threat of tariffs. It’s the mismanagement, by this NDP government, of what once was one of the main drivers of BC’s economy, that’s got us to this place.

We’re going to end up this whole province, and the next thing you know, it’s going to be on fire because we’re not addressing forest health, we’re not addressing climate change, we’re not addressing the risks that are associated with communities and people living near forests.

We are moving head with some wildfire fuel mitigation, but interface fires are going to occur because we have fuel everywhere.

We need a comprehensive approach, not only for fuel reduction, but also for the long-term sustainability of our forest industry, and the people that it employs.

Again, there are other jurisdictions (Sweden just being one) with better track records than we have, and they’re able to harvest three times the amount of fibre from their land base than we are.

Why is that? 

Again, I have to say it’s because of mismanagement.

There’s no confidence in this government; there’s no confidence in this forest minister, and there’s no confidence in going forward with these guys.

That’s why we need a new perspective and a new approach on this - one with a full partnership with our First Nations, and our communities. We can't continue to say it’s going to be done -- we have to actually do it.

If we don’t act quickly we will end up with devastating consequences; not only to our forest industry, but also from forest fires because we have failed to address the root issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more