Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

STAMER: Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?


This morning, I came across a news article with concerns and comments from Powell River Mayor Ron Woznow, about the forest industry getting enough fibre – especially, ‘at least 45 million cubic metres of economically viable fibre for the 2025 calendar year.’

His concerns, echo what everyone else is saying.

First the provincial government gave us “the promise of 45” -- then it was “the drive to 45” – and now, apparently, it’s “the path to 45”.
Really, are we even going to get close to 45?  The budget from BC’s Finance Minister says 30 … so really? How are they going to get to 45? 

There’s no plan, no real engagement, no business support, no nothing … and no path forward to get there.

Woznow also went on to say that 'economic activity isn’t occurring because of the significant addition of regulations. It affects small businesses, it affects contractors, and so this motion is to let the minister of forests know that there is an opportunity to move forward and to have faith in the chief forester.'

Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?

The reality is, and as we said as a party, we need to be able to determine, with our First Nations, with our community forests, with our licensees, on exactly what is sustainable.  And where are we going to be able to actually harvest on a regular basis? 

Not only that, but we’re going to be including fuel reduction across the province.
Forest Minister Ravi Parmar has agreed, on the record, that we should be removing trees in all areas of the province, including protected areas. He’s already on record saying that.  We all know that we need to protect our forests and provincial parks, and our protected areas -- so, what’s the comprehensive plan?

Let me ask this.  In Revelstoke, BC Timber Sales just took out available fibre for Caribou habitat, but we don’t actual know how much land will be taken out.  Again, to say you’re going to get to 45, but then you keep removing these areas from being harvested, what are we going to have left?
We have to really be able to sit down and come up with a province-wide plan, not just a band-aid solution because a band-aid solution is making it harder and harder for us to have a sustainable forest industry.

Sweden has a sustainable model that harvests over 100 million cubic metres of timber a year, on a land mass smaller than BC! And we can only do 30? That just shows the mismanagement that this NDP government has done to our forest industry over the past eight years.

We’ve gone from logging 50 million cubic metres to just 30. We’ve lost a third of forestry jobs in the past forty-eight months. And in that same time period the provincial treasury has lost seventy-five percent of direct revenue it previously received from the forest industry.
That’s shocking! 

It’s not just global and it’s not just the threat of tariffs. It’s the mismanagement, by this NDP government, of what once was one of the main drivers of BC’s economy, that’s got us to this place.

We’re going to end up this whole province, and the next thing you know, it’s going to be on fire because we’re not addressing forest health, we’re not addressing climate change, we’re not addressing the risks that are associated with communities and people living near forests.

We are moving head with some wildfire fuel mitigation, but interface fires are going to occur because we have fuel everywhere.

We need a comprehensive approach, not only for fuel reduction, but also for the long-term sustainability of our forest industry, and the people that it employs.

Again, there are other jurisdictions (Sweden just being one) with better track records than we have, and they’re able to harvest three times the amount of fibre from their land base than we are.

Why is that? 

Again, I have to say it’s because of mismanagement.

There’s no confidence in this government; there’s no confidence in this forest minister, and there’s no confidence in going forward with these guys.

That’s why we need a new perspective and a new approach on this - one with a full partnership with our First Nations, and our communities. We can't continue to say it’s going to be done -- we have to actually do it.
If we don’t act quickly we will end up with devastating consequences; not only to our forest industry, but also from forest fires because we have failed to address the root issues.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more