Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

STAMER: Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?


This morning, I came across a news article with concerns and comments from Powell River Mayor Ron Woznow, about the forest industry getting enough fibre – especially, ‘at least 45 million cubic metres of economically viable fibre for the 2025 calendar year.’

His concerns, echo what everyone else is saying.

First the provincial government gave us “the promise of 45” -- then it was “the drive to 45” – and now, apparently, it’s “the path to 45”.

Really, are we even going to get close to 45?  The budget from BC’s Finance Minister says 30 … so really? How are they going to get to 45? 

There’s no plan, no real engagement, no business support, no nothing … and no path forward to get there.

Woznow also went on to say that 'economic activity isn’t occurring because of the significant addition of regulations. It affects small businesses, it affects contractors, and so this motion is to let the minister of forests know that there is an opportunity to move forward and to have faith in the chief forester.'

Is it going to take a year? Two years? Five years, to get to 45 million cubic metres of ‘economically viable’ fibre?

The reality is, and as we said as a party, we need to be able to determine, with our First Nations, with our community forests, with our licensees, on exactly what is sustainable.  And where are we going to be able to actually harvest on a regular basis? 

Not only that, but we’re going to be including fuel reduction across the province.

Forest Minister Ravi Parmar has agreed, on the record, that we should be removing trees in all areas of the province, including protected areas. He’s already on record saying that.  We all know that we need to protect our forests and provincial parks, and our protected areas -- so, what’s the comprehensive plan?

Let me ask this.  In Revelstoke, BC Timber Sales just took out available fibre for Caribou habitat, but we don’t actual know how much land will be taken out.  Again, to say you’re going to get to 45, but then you keep removing these areas from being harvested, what are we going to have left?

We have to really be able to sit down and come up with a province-wide plan, not just a band-aid solution because a band-aid solution is making it harder and harder for us to have a sustainable forest industry.

Sweden has a sustainable model that harvests over 100 million cubic metres of timber a year, on a land mass smaller than BC! And we can only do 30? That just shows the mismanagement that this NDP government has done to our forest industry over the past eight years.

We’ve gone from logging 50 million cubic metres to just 30. We’ve lost a third of forestry jobs in the past forty-eight months. And in that same time period the provincial treasury has lost seventy-five percent of direct revenue it previously received from the forest industry.

That’s shocking! 

It’s not just global and it’s not just the threat of tariffs. It’s the mismanagement, by this NDP government, of what once was one of the main drivers of BC’s economy, that’s got us to this place.

We’re going to end up this whole province, and the next thing you know, it’s going to be on fire because we’re not addressing forest health, we’re not addressing climate change, we’re not addressing the risks that are associated with communities and people living near forests.

We are moving head with some wildfire fuel mitigation, but interface fires are going to occur because we have fuel everywhere.

We need a comprehensive approach, not only for fuel reduction, but also for the long-term sustainability of our forest industry, and the people that it employs.

Again, there are other jurisdictions (Sweden just being one) with better track records than we have, and they’re able to harvest three times the amount of fibre from their land base than we are.

Why is that? 

Again, I have to say it’s because of mismanagement.

There’s no confidence in this government; there’s no confidence in this forest minister, and there’s no confidence in going forward with these guys.

That’s why we need a new perspective and a new approach on this - one with a full partnership with our First Nations, and our communities. We can't continue to say it’s going to be done -- we have to actually do it.

If we don’t act quickly we will end up with devastating consequences; not only to our forest industry, but also from forest fires because we have failed to address the root issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more