Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ICBA calls for immediate clarity: Will government be bound by BC’s new Prompt Payment law?


The Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA), Canada’s largest construction association, is urging the NDP Government to confirm that all public owners – including ministries, Crown corporations, government agencies, municipal halls, school boards, and regional districts – must comply with Bill 20, the Construction Prompt Payment Act.

While Bill 20 generally applies to construction contracts, it also allows government to exclude “prescribed” improvements or owners by regulation and to differentiate based on “public or private ownership.” ICBA is seeking an unequivocal commitment that public owners will not be carved out or phased in later than the private sector.

“Prompt payment has to mean prompt payment for everyone – including the Province and municipalities,” said Chris Gardner, ICBA President. “If government exempts itself or delays its own compliance, the law’s credibility will be undermined on day one. Public owners must lead by example, pay on time, and follow the same rules as every private owner.”

The Act comes into force only by regulation and can be rolled out gradually by sector, creating uncertainty unless government states its intent now.

“Our members want a fair system that starts with government confirming it is fully subject to the Act, without loopholes, carve-outs, or slow-walked implementation,” said Gardner.

ICBA is calling on the Attorney General to immediately confirm:

  • that all public owners (ministries, Crown corporations, BCIB, health authorities, educational and municipal bodies) are in scope;
  • that no public-owner exemptions will be introduced by regulation; and
  • that implementation timelines will apply equally to public and private sectors


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more