Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- The federal and provincial governments soak up the attention of multi-million-dollar announcements. If they’re unwilling however to make the tough decisions on aquaculture license holders, then it’s a waste of money


I feel I must circle back around and address the recent explosion of sea lice on the west coast, and the continued persistence of open-net pen fish farms in British Columbia waters.  And, I must restate my dissatisfaction with the decades of poor resource management in our province.

In recent months, I have been working on several fronts, primarily forestry, fish, wildlife, oil and gas development. For an entire year my colleagues and I drew considerable attention to the urgent crisis with wild salmon on the British Columbia coast.


Policy decisions in a half dozen Ministries impact the well-being of wild salmon. Our work has shone a light on the historic mismanagement of watersheds, over-logging and the impact of poorly designed infrastructure.

Fish farms are another significant threat to wild salmon in coastal waters.

Background
Open-net pen fish farms have been a major source of frustration for British Columbians; there is a growing body of evidence to support the need for a wholesale change to the industry.

With aquaculture tenures in the Broughton Archipelago set to expire last June, the provincial government was under substantial pressure to not renew them. In the end, they let the tenures revert to a month-to-month scenario. The province then undertook "government-to-government" negotiations with the First Nations in the Broughton. In December of last year, the province announced an agreement with three First Nations in the area, the ‘Namgis, Kwikwasut’inuxw Haxwa’mis and Mamalilikulla.

This was widely regarded as a positive step forward in a decade-long struggle with open-net pen fish farms. I had substantial concerns that the celebration was premature. The government did a good job with First Nations in the Broughton Archipelago but that is it. Dozens of other fish farms remain on the British Columbia coast.

Helping wild salmon?
This spring, we again see the impacts of the provincial and federal governments lack of action.

On one hand while they plan to spend more than $140 million on wild salmon over the next five years, they fail to act definitively on removing fish farms which remain a significant threat to those same fish. We have seen a growing body of evidence that open-net pen fish farms are a major source of disease and parasites.

Just last week, we saw another story about the devastation of sea lice on the wild salmon in Clayoquot Sound. This is not a new problem, and yet the response from Minister Jonathan Wilkinson (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) is to write a letter to aquaculture operators in the area to ask them to comply with the regulations.

This is clearly not good enough. Both the federal and provincial governments soak up the attention of multi-million-dollar announcements; however, if they are unwilling to make the tough decisions on aquaculture license holders, then it is a waste of money.


Broughton Archipelago Marine Provincial Park
The province wants to be seen as leading on government-to-government relationships with First Nations, and they did a fine job with three of the five First Nations in the Broughton Archipelago. Salmon are a critical species for First Nations on the coast, and in the interior.

Where were those voices at the table? How were their interests represented? They weren't. The federal government wants be seen as making difficult decisions on salmon conservation, but their wild salmon policy is confusing, inconsistent and desperate.

Transition
I am thankful that our effort has successfully injected some momentum into wild salmon initiatives in British Columbia. It's proven that persistence pays off. We will not stop this work.

Just the other week I received a letter from Wild Salmon Forever, a powerful group of wild salmon advocates, responsible for the Wild First campaign. The list of their supporters is an impressive collection of British Columbians from all walks of life. They are environmental, social and business activists of all socio-economic backgrounds, political stripes and philosophies. They gather together around a single message: we need to get open-net pen aquaculture operations out of coastal British Columbia waters.

It does not end there though. They have done the work to show the federal and provincial governments that there is an economic case to aggressively transition the current industry to closed containment.

Attached to their letter to me was the outline for a plan that would position British Columbia as a global leader, while addressing the substantial environmental concerns about the current industry. 

The six aspects of the plan include:
1.   A permanent moratorium on open-net pen aquaculture in the Discovery Channel and a freeze on all new open-net farms
2.   Expansion of testing and treatment of smolts infected with pathogens, parasites and viruses such as Piscine Reovirus (PRV),
3.   Leveraging the license renewals to seek better regulatory compliance, induce the adoption of new technologies and move to closed-containment,
4.   Consent of Indigenous peoples,
5.   Comprehensive program to attract an emerging land-based aquaculture industry to British Columbia, and
6.   Skills training and workforce readiness programming.

Moving ahead
Maintaining the status quo is easy. However, British Columbians do not want to carry the liabilities for industries that are much to willing to offload their environmental costs onto the public purse.

This is not just saying no. Rather; it is embracing the opportunity in front of us. Let's say yes to an industry that is environmentally and socially acceptable, with partners who are willing to act responsibly.

Both the federal and provincial governments have in front of them a plan that clearly shows the economic, social and environmental benefits of a land-based closed-containment aquaculture industry in British Columbia. Now we just need the political will that extends beyond a Ministerial letter-writing campaign to bold action.

Let's do it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more