Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ERNIE BEADLE – In defence of your position, I totally agree we need gun control, however that control already exists, and it is very stringent on who can own a gun and who can’t


For some time now a local Kamloops Liberal supporter has been taking shots at the Conservative Party over any number of things – all of them negative.  In a recent exchange he accused the party of been against pretty much any and all gun control legislation. Ernie Beadle, of Kamloops, took exception to that – this is his response:


For the record, it was the Conservatives in 1990 who were the FIRST government to bring in gun registry, NOT the Liberals!  Then in 1993, under Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien, he further pushed this registry (The Firearms Act was introduced in 1993, and aimed at the licensing of all gun owners and registration of all firearms. The bill also classified replica firearms as prohibited devices, with those already owned being grandfathered).

Move ahead to 1996, and we have Alan Rock (Justice Minister in the Liberal government) telling all Canadians that the Gun Registry would only cost $2 million dollars – meantime in December of 2002, Auditor General Sheila Fraser reported to parliament that through poor management by the federal Liberals, the gun registry would cost over $1 BILLION dollars to set up by the year 2004!

During the 10 years of reign of Liberal Prime Minister Chretien, they allowed this program to cost taxpayers in excess of $1 billion dollars to implement, and then did absolutely nothing to stop this bizarre bleeding of taxpayer dollars.

When the program started in 1993 costs were to be $2 million -- by 1995 they were already $119 million -- in 2001 costs had reached $527 million – by 2002 costs had risen to $629 million -- and by 2004 it was at over a BILLION dollars.

And what did it solve?

Absolutely nothing, and if you people want to try to argue this, I will give you the Stats Can facts on murders since 1993, to date.  It will embarrass you and your argument, so I suggest you don’t go there!

In defense of your position, I totally agree we need gun control, however that control already exists, and it is very stringent on who can own a gun, and who can’t.

This is not the issue.
 
Violent Crime in Canada -- StatsCan
The federal Liberals tried to buy votes by telling the misinformed public that there were going to save Canada with this gun registry ... and it did absolutely nothing to stop murders because ... criminals do not register their firearms.  Instead they still buy illegal guns, and bring them into Canada to commit their crimes. This is he real problem, and it is created by criminals, not the general public.  Still, this vote buying exercise, by the Liberals, cost taxpayers $1billion dollars!

If the federal Liberals really want to solve gun and fire arms related problems, rather than screw the taxpayers with their ill-conceived registry, they should go after the criminals, NOT the law-abiding citizens of Canada!

That, is the root of the problem and the true facts.



PLEASE NOTE ... according to Statistics Canada between 2013 and 2016, there was a 20% increase in homicides in Canada.

This was driven by a substantive increase (+68%) in gang-related homicides over that period. From 2013 to 2016, gang-related homicides occurring in CMAs (Central Metropolitan Areas) almost doubled (from 65 to 121), driven by increases in Toronto (from 13 to 33), Edmonton (3 to 11), and Ottawa (0 to 7).

In 2013, about one in four (27%) homicides were committed with a firearm. By 2016, four in ten (38%) homicides involved a firearm.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more