Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ERNIE BEADLE – In defence of your position, I totally agree we need gun control, however that control already exists, and it is very stringent on who can own a gun and who can’t


For some time now a local Kamloops Liberal supporter has been taking shots at the Conservative Party over any number of things – all of them negative.  In a recent exchange he accused the party of been against pretty much any and all gun control legislation. Ernie Beadle, of Kamloops, took exception to that – this is his response:


For the record, it was the Conservatives in 1990 who were the FIRST government to bring in gun registry, NOT the Liberals!  Then in 1993, under Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien, he further pushed this registry (The Firearms Act was introduced in 1993, and aimed at the licensing of all gun owners and registration of all firearms. The bill also classified replica firearms as prohibited devices, with those already owned being grandfathered).

Move ahead to 1996, and we have Alan Rock (Justice Minister in the Liberal government) telling all Canadians that the Gun Registry would only cost $2 million dollars – meantime in December of 2002, Auditor General Sheila Fraser reported to parliament that through poor management by the federal Liberals, the gun registry would cost over $1 BILLION dollars to set up by the year 2004!

During the 10 years of reign of Liberal Prime Minister Chretien, they allowed this program to cost taxpayers in excess of $1 billion dollars to implement, and then did absolutely nothing to stop this bizarre bleeding of taxpayer dollars.

When the program started in 1993 costs were to be $2 million -- by 1995 they were already $119 million -- in 2001 costs had reached $527 million – by 2002 costs had risen to $629 million -- and by 2004 it was at over a BILLION dollars.

And what did it solve?

Absolutely nothing, and if you people want to try to argue this, I will give you the Stats Can facts on murders since 1993, to date.  It will embarrass you and your argument, so I suggest you don’t go there!

In defense of your position, I totally agree we need gun control, however that control already exists, and it is very stringent on who can own a gun, and who can’t.

This is not the issue.
 
Violent Crime in Canada -- StatsCan
The federal Liberals tried to buy votes by telling the misinformed public that there were going to save Canada with this gun registry ... and it did absolutely nothing to stop murders because ... criminals do not register their firearms.  Instead they still buy illegal guns, and bring them into Canada to commit their crimes. This is he real problem, and it is created by criminals, not the general public.  Still, this vote buying exercise, by the Liberals, cost taxpayers $1billion dollars!

If the federal Liberals really want to solve gun and fire arms related problems, rather than screw the taxpayers with their ill-conceived registry, they should go after the criminals, NOT the law-abiding citizens of Canada!

That, is the root of the problem and the true facts.



PLEASE NOTE ... according to Statistics Canada between 2013 and 2016, there was a 20% increase in homicides in Canada.

This was driven by a substantive increase (+68%) in gang-related homicides over that period. From 2013 to 2016, gang-related homicides occurring in CMAs (Central Metropolitan Areas) almost doubled (from 65 to 121), driven by increases in Toronto (from 13 to 33), Edmonton (3 to 11), and Ottawa (0 to 7).

In 2013, about one in four (27%) homicides were committed with a firearm. By 2016, four in ten (38%) homicides involved a firearm.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more