Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Simpson says the days of bullying people into silence by calling them names is over. Then why is she bullying - threatening - reprimanding – and arguing against a select group of people being able to have the same human rights as all Canadians


Have you ever heard of Kari Simpson? I might be wrong, but if you haven't, I'd say that you’re lucky!   

As the Executive Director for the Culture Guard website, and Facebook page , she is responsible for much of what is disseminated – regrettably.

Simpson threatens protest at Surrey RCMP detachment
Her latest target? 

On her Culture Guard Facebook page, Kari Simpson is threatening a protest at the Surrey RCMP detachment, if they raise what she calls the anti-Canadian political symbol, the rainbow flag.  In fact, she is telling people to contact RCMP and say tell them STOP!”

As part the rationale replayed to the RCMP, in a four-page Culture Guard letter, she quotes the RCMP Code of Conduct regulations. For example:

2.1  Respect and Courtesy:
Members treat every person with respect and courtesy and do not engage in discrimination or harassment

SERIOUSLY!  How can she possibly use that as the first reason in threatening the Surrey RCMP with a protest should they raise the Pride Flag?

Or how about this one, she also use for her rationale, under the Respect for the Law and the Administration of Justice:

3.1  Members respect the law and the rights of all individuals
3.2  Members act with integrity, fairness, impartiality, and do not compromise or abuse their authority, power of position

AGAIN ... every the about 3.1 and 3.2 goes completely against her argument.  Does she not understand this?  

Oh, but she’s not done yet as she continues to quote the RCMP Code of Conduct – this time the section dealing with Discreditable Conduct:

7.1 Members behave in a manner that is not likely to discredit the force.

Culture Guard Executive Director Kari Simpson
Somehow it seems, and appears, that Ms. Simpson has no understanding of Human Rights and discrimination -- and so she threatens a protest against the RCMP if they don’t agree to not raise the Pride flag.  

In my opinion, the RCMP, behaving in the manner in which she is demanding, would indeed discredit the them amongst the majority of British Columbians, and Canadians.

She goes on, and on, and on in her four-page diatribe, with more of the same. 

These unsavory politically motivated trends (what? being LGBTQ2s is a trend?) must not be allowed to impugn the once proud reputation of Canada’s national police force. It is imperative that the RCMP protect its’ impartiality. Flying this political symbol does exactly the opposite

In an exchange Ms. Simpson and I had, I stated to her:

Please stop posting items like this here - you have your own Culture Guard Facebook page, where this, regrettably, would be welcome.  Your own organization, has this same post / story ... and I have to state unequivocally that you are a hateful person, and your comments border (only slightly) on hate speech ... especially when your state the Pride flag is an, "... anti-Canadian political symbol ..."

Her response?

If advocating for the RCMP to remain politically neutral is "hate speech" you are on the wrong page.

If you believe exposing sex activists are anti-Canadian by abusing our schools, our children, violating the rights of others to engage in free speech, and assembly you are on the wrong page.

The over-whelming majority of people in this group share the growing concerns of Canadians across the country sex politics and the extremism therein must end.

Political parties who want to govern MUST start addressing the Goliath stomping over our nation ... can make an impact this next election by taking a strong position on parental rights, stop the government funding of sex activist political organizations operating as "non-profit organizations".
 
She went, saying:

Exposing truth is not hate speech. I support the rights of all people in our free society, until they want to trample on mine. You are going to have to move into the reality that the tide has turned on these issues Alan. The days of bullying people into silence by calling them names is over. The affects of the sex activist political agenda is devastating, it is time to stop the assault upon our children, our rights and the public coffers.”

Hold on a minute .... ‘The days of bullying people into silence by calling them names is over’? 

What the hell does she think she is doing?  Bullying ... threatening ... reprimanding ... arguing against a select group of people being able to have the same human rights as all Canadians.

And then there’s her comment that she’ll ... support the rights of all people in our free society, until they want to trample on mine. If that’s her argument for being allowed to trample on the LGBTQ2s community, what about others who will say she is trampling on their rights. Or the beliefs of the multitudes of large or small groups that people will have disagreement with?

I am uncertain why, however in disagreeing with her, I was apparently ... in a nasty mood!


A quick read of the BC Human Rights Code will brighten your day! You see the purpose of the code is to ensure everyone gets to participate in our free society, mutual respect, without impediment.

I bet you thought that was a reply from me to Ms. Simpson? Well it wasn’t. Those were her words to me as she lectured me on Human Rights.

Regardless, all I can say is with as much apparent anger as Kari Simpson has towards the LGBTQ2S community, and her appalling desire to drive them back in to the closet, I have to feel sorry for her, and those in her organization that support and agree with those kinds of beliefs.

What do you think about this?  I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more