Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- The choices are difficult and made worse by ‘attack ads’ where one party or group attacks one of the other leaders and suggests, without evidence, that he will do great harm


As we move closer to election day, beware the backups 
Shachi Kurl ~~ Ottawa Citizen ~~ June 7, 2019

OK, can we talk about backups? Everyone’s got them: your backup vacation home checker, in case your first choice has a record of drowning house plants. Your backup babysitter when brother-in-law wants a night off. Your backup dogwalker when Fido has trust issues with the designated primary. Your backup date to that wedding at the cottage later this summer, just in case your current, nascent romance doesn’t quite last that long.

In an online, app-based world when our relational and consumer choices are endless and never quite locked in, to be a backup is an important position. In party politics, it could be everything.

It was indeed everything to Justin Trudeau and the federal Liberals in the summer of 2015. The leader who began the campaign season in third place slowly, winsomely crept to power as the backup ...

CLICK HERE to read the full story:


In almost six decades of following federal politics, I have never witnessed a more volatile election that that scheduled for October.

Canadians have lost faith and trust in political parties and politicians. The bright promises Justin Trudeau and the Liberals made in 2015 have turned into scandal ridden incompetence. Political cronyism we always suspected has taken front stage. Slapstick foreign policy and visits to other nations have been embarrassing.

Opposition party fixation on scandal has not helped. We are left to wonder who is taking care of business, carrying out the duties of our federal government, ensuring that spending and taxation is necessary and prudent. The silence is deafening.

We face an election trying to decide what party and leader will do the least damage and possibly some good over the next four years.

The choices are difficult and made worse by ‘attack ads’ where one party or group attacks one of the other leaders and suggests, without evidence, that he will do great harm if elected. All parties are making promised to provide us with better governance.

We have heard it all before.

So far ... no party has put forth a credible plan for building a better future that includes providing basic services the federal government is responsible for, growing our economy, curbing unneeded spending, reducing our tax burden and providing people and families with more choices.

So far ... not party has offered to remove constraints from MPs campaigning under their banner and allow for full and free debates in parliament and free votes on legislation under consideration. The infringement on the freedoms of association, belief, conscience, speech and thought cannot be condoned. The voices of MPs and the people they represent are muzzled. 
  

There is a lot of political advertising and rhetoric to come our way this summer and fall. Appeals to our emotions will commence in September. Political parties have never had to fight so hard to get our attention in an electronic era competing with advertisers who will use any ploy to grab our attention.

This election has a high probability of a minority government. Many people will ‘park’ their votes with parties they consider the least likely to make matters worse.

How that wrings out remains to be seen, but traditional appeals by political parties are unlikely to succeed as well as they have in the past. Our problem in selecting who to support will result is unanticipated surprises.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more