Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

“Every other oil producer in the world is laughing all the way to the bank”, Mel Arnold


Regrettably Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, along with Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, have received a gift, courtesy of the majority of Senators ... the passing of Bills C-48 and C-69.

For those not aware, Bill C-48 is the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, which prohibits oil tankers that are carrying more than 12 500 metric tons of crude oil or persistent oil as cargo from stopping, or unloading crude oil or persistent oil, at ports or marine installations located along British Columbia’s north coast from the northern tip of Vancouver Island to the Alaska border.

As to Bill C-69, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (through its website magazine) states that ... the government has positioned the changes to the NEBA and CEAA embodied in Bill C-69 as a means of eliminating regulatory uncertainty, providing clarity, avoiding legal action, and increasing Indigenous and stakeholder engagement.

While these goals are ostensibly positive, there is a growing consensus among industry groups and business leaders that the bill falls short of its aspirations. It lacks clarity on key issues, creating the likelihood that it will make an already complex system more complicated, while ultimately raising uncertainty and the potential for litigation. Contrary to the government’s stated intentions, Bill C-69 in its current form will be a significant barrier to future investment, putting jobs at risk.

Neither of these two Bill were/are in the best interests of Canadians, and were only fueled by Justin Trudeau’s desire to be seen on the world stage as one of the strongest allies of the United Nations, and it’s outrageous clouding of facts around the environment.

I could have specifically written on this today – however the following three gentlemen have said it much better than I ever could have:



Senator Richard Neufeld:

Yesterday, the Senate adopted Bills C-48 and C-69 ... two of the most controversial bills I've had to deal with since my appointment to the Senate 10 years ago.

The Senate's Official Opposition did an outstanding job in highlighting the many flaws in these two pieces of legislation. In particular, we severely amended Bill C-69 but the Government rejected nearly all of the amendments brought forward by Conservative Senators and endorsed by the entire Senate.

Having been heavily involved in the study and review of these two bills, I am very disappointed in the final outcome. Below are the final remarks I delivered in the Senate on C-48 and C-69.


Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer:

This is a sad day for Canada. With the passage of Bill C-69, Justin Trudeau finally has his law that will phase out Canada’s oil and gas industry.


This has been Trudeau’s objective all along, to eliminate the industry and the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who rely on it for their livelihoods. He told Canadians on January 13, 2017 that he wanted to “phase out” the oil sands, and Bill C-69 is how he will do it.

Nine out of ten Premiers, representing all political stripes, have called on Trudeau to scrap or amend this job-killing legislation. Instead of listening to their concerns, Trudeau lashed out and attacked their credibility, recklessly accusing them of threatening national unity.

Instead, it’s Trudeau himself who has caused unrest with the provinces, with disastrous legislation like Bill C-69 that tramples on their jurisdiction and destroys Canadian industry.

Conservatives have said all along we would repeal this legislation, and we will. Bill C-69 will be history after this October.

While Trudeau divides Canadians and attacks our energy workers, Conservatives have a plan to unite Canadians, get Canada’s resource sector back to work, and help all Canadians get ahead.

 
MP Mel Arnold (North Okanagan – Shuswap):
Yesterday, senators passed Bill C-69, Justin Trudeau’s “No More Pipelines Bill”. This piece of legislation has been met with opposition from Premiers, mayors, Indigenous groups, business leaders, and Canadians from coast to coast.

This Bill will landlock Canadian oil and gas and deprive billions from Canada’s economy. Despite this, Justin Trudeau rammed through this legislation at the last minute.

Every other oil producer in the world is laughing all the way to the bank.



Let me conclude by saying, the one thing that Canadians can have hope in, is that Prime Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party of Canada, are defeated at the polls on October 21st. 

The Conservatives Andrew Scheer has promised to repeal this legislation essentially still land-locking the majority of Canadian oil from reaching world-wide markets.

To the date, October 21st is only four months away.  I, and many others, will be hoping that October 22nd begins the victory party and the end of Bills C-48 and C-49.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more