Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RESIDENT SUPPORT CONSISTANT ACROSS BC ON TRANS MOUNTAIN -- 59% of Metro Vancouver residents, 60% of Vancouver Island residents, and 63% of northern / interior residents




An Ipsos survey conducted last week found a solid majority of British Columbians support the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project.

Sponsored by Resource Works, the survey found 60 per cent of British Columbians support the project, while only 29 per cent oppose it. The survey of more than 800 people from across the province conducted June 10 – 14 asked:

Do you personally support or oppose the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project,
which involves building a second pipeline on the existing route between Alberta and Metro Vancouver?

Most British Columbians continue to support this important pipeline project, after evaluating a lot of inflammatory claims. Even the opposition of the BC NDP and local politicians in Vancouver and Burnaby doesn’t seem to have mattered that much. In the end, it is plain to a significant majority that this is a beneficial project,” said Stewart Muir, Executive Director of Resource Works.

British Columbians can see through the politics and rhetoric to understand we rely on Alberta oil and gas to fuel our vehicles, homes, and workplaces, and that this pipeline is desperately needed to ensure a steady supply.”

The federal government is expected to make a decision on whether and how the pipeline will proceed tomorrow, June 18.

It is our hope the federal government continue to make decisions on such projects on the basis of fact and science rather than spin, and do the right thing for all of Canada and the world,” Muir said. “It is time to act.”

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a real issue, and there is no question we need to transition towards energy sources that don’t involve burning carbon,” Muir added.

However, renewables are early in development and decades away from fueling our lives. In the meantime, burning lower-pollution fuels is an important part of our transition. Clean-burning Canadian oil and gas can help replace dirty coal in countries like China and India, making our industries part of the solution.”

The survey results were consistent across B.C., with 59 per cent of Metro Vancouver residents, 60 per cent of Vancouver Island residents, and 63 per cent of northern/interior B.C. residents polled expressing support for the project. A similar poll by Angus Reid in April 2018 found 55 per cent of Canadians are in favour of the project.

According to the Trans Mountain Expansion Project Overview, the $7.4 billion project will generate $46.7 billion in taxes and royalties in its first 20 years, funds that will pay for critical services such as police and other emergency services, infrastructure, hospitals, schools, and child care, even B.C.’s evolution to a green economy.

An estimated $5.7 billion of that will come to B.C.’s provincial government over two decades.

The project will employ 15,000 people during construction and then support another 37,000 permanent jobs once it is complete. Nearly a quarter of those jobs will be in B.C. – some 9,250 permanent, family-supporting jobs, many in rural communities. 


Stated Mr. Muir, “Without sufficient pipeline capacity however, Canada is unable to get much of its oil and gas to the international market, costing the country an estimated $30 - $40 million a day in lost revenue and forcing China and other nations to seek other sources of fuel for industry and electricity generation.”

Further, the pipeline is safe.

The existing pipeline has shipped oil from Alberta since 1953 with a small number of spills on land and without a drop of oil being spilled into the ocean by a tanker.

The project will provide $150 million in new private funding to the Western Canada Marine Response Corporation (WCMRC) to strengthen the already-strong spill response capacity along B.C.’s coastline.

The Alternative?

Without sufficient pipeline capacity however, Canada is unable to get much of its oil and gas to the international market, costing the country an estimated $30 - $40 million a day in lost revenue and forcing China and other nations to seek other sources of fuel for industry and electricity generation.”




About Resource Works:
Resource Works communicates with British Columbians about the importance of the province's resource sectors to their personal well-being. It demonstrates how responsible development of British Columbia's resources creates jobs and incomes throughout the province, both directly and indirectly, while maintaining a clean and healthy environment.

And Resource Works explores the long-term economic future of British Columbia as a place that depends on the responsible development, extraction and transportation of the province's resources.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more