Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RUSTAD: Zero Emission Vehicles? BC collects significant gasoline taxes which pays for transit as well as road maintenance and upgrades. If nobody is buying gasoline, how will this bill be paid


The NDP passed a bill this spring requiring BC to sell nothing but Zero Emission Vehicles by 2040. Was this a good piece of legislation?

In my opinion, the goal of having people drive a zero-emission vehicle is a good one, but what the bill did NOT do was explain how this could be achieved.

First, where will the electricity come from? With expected population growth, BC will require the equivalent of 4 Site C dams in production, to meet the electrical demand from electric vehicles. Now some of those vehicles may be hydrogen but the result would be the same as the production of hydrogen still requires electricity.

How will this amount of electricity be created?

Some say from solar or wind. Those are fine but how will that power be firmed. Also, are you prepared to pay skyrocketing electricity prices? That is what this bill by the NDP will mean.

How is that making life more affordable?

Second, high speed charging stations requires significant transmission capabilities. Most (if not all) neighborhoods in existence today do not have the capacity to enable the number of charging stations required.

In other words, there will need to be a HUGE investment in upgrading BC’s transmission capabilities both in the general grid, as well as at the household level. Who will pay for this and what is the cost? I will speculate that the cost will be in the hundreds of billions of dollars which will need to be paid by tax payers.

Once again, how does this make life more affordable?


Third, BC collects significant gasoline taxes which pays for transit as well as road maintenance and upgrades. If nobody is buying gasoline, how will this bill be paid?

Forth, the range of electric vehicles is very limited. For example, an EV would not even have the capacity for me to drive from one side of my riding to the other, not to mention trying to get home in the same day. How will the vast distances of our great provinces be addressed for people who require to drive for work, health appointments, school, etc...?

The BC NDP’s zero emission vehicle bill certainly appears to be about politics as clearly, there are no plans to address even these basic issues. To realistically achieve a 2040 goal, BC would need to start making plans and investments TODAY to address these issues.

AND ... this doesn’t even include the environmental impacts that would need to be addressed due to disposing of batteries and other issues associated with electric vehicles.

NOR ... according to one individual commenting to John on this ... does it consider what happens when the batteries reach the end and must be replaced. I imagine that would run many thousands that a lot of families don't or won't have.

And as for the distance one would be able to travel on a single charge? Another commented to John that where he lived (in the city) he could get 400km on a charge, and that traveling from south to north borders of BC will require two full recharges, which with a DC fast charge will take an hour each.

Seeing as MLA Rustad lives in the Nechako riding, I’m not surprised when he responded by stating:

“400km range... hmmm? My riding is about 280kms, along Highway 16, one way. And how long does it take to recharge? Oh yah, don't turn on the heater or the air conditioning because you certainly won't get 400km range.”

I’m with you on this one John.



John Rustad worked in the forest industry in logging and forest management. He started and operated Western Geographic Information Systems Inc. from 1995 to 2002 where he was engaged in forestry consulting. 

John was first elected to the BC Legislature in 2005 and was re-elected in 2009, 2013 and 2017. He served in various capacities including parliamentary secretary for Silviculture, parliamentary secretary for Forests, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation and Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. 

He is currently the critic for Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more