Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Plastic thingies are not the problem – it is the material they are made from. If a plastic fork or spoon is made of recyclable or biodegradable material, single use is not an issue


Government to ban single-use plastic straws, cotton swabs, drink stirrers, plates, cutlery, some plastic bags all on the list
Hannah Thibedeau ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 09, 2019

The Trudeau government will ban single-use plastics as early as 2021, CBC News has learned from a government source ... this is part of a larger strategy to tackle the plastic pollution problem that the government is expected to announce Monday.


... according to the source, the full list of plastics to be banned by the federal government will follow the model chosen by the European Union ... fast-food containers and cups made of expanded polystyrene, which is similar to white styrofoam, will also be banned.

... all of those countries have moved to curb plastic pollution, some of them with laws to reduce the consumption of plastics.



The originality of thinking by Trudeau and McKenna is staggering. Parroting the EU which is vastly different from Canada in almost every aspect – geography, size, population density, traffic infrastructure and climate for starters, is silly.

The regulation of local sales and services is a provincial**, not a federal jurisdiction. There is nothing to give the federal jurisdiction over local issues. The Trudeau Liberals are trolling for votes and ignoring the constitution – again.

Managing local services, including waste removal and disposal is a provincial subject and responsibility. Trudeau is trying to cherry pick an emotional issue out of a larger subject. Is he really ready to take on waste removal and disposal as a federal responsibility?          

Plastic thingies are not the problem – it is the material they are made from. If a plastic fork or spoon is made of recyclable or biodegradable material, single use is not an issue.

Incinerator technology has made great strides in reducing landfill problems, but we are not even in the picture.  Governments tend to deal with symptoms while ignoring the underlying illness. Environmentalists bemoan public refusal to sort recyclables from their trash. So much trash is not recyclable that the household is left with a large mound of trash that hardly makes sorting worthwhile.

The Trudeau solution, which is to make life difficult for consumers, is inane. His government should look at banning the manufacture and import of plastics that are not either biodegradable or recyclable.

Manufacturers will find ways to create products that are less harmful to the environment, however they have no incentive to do so at present. Give them a tax allowance for research and development of environmentally friendly plastic materials.  After that, specialty plastics used in manufacturing, machinery parts, equipment and vehicles can be dealt with separately.


Recycle programs are bogged down in having to sort out useful plastic from heaps of plastic that is not.

The key is to reduce the plastics that can’t be recycled.

Recycle programs don’t want various materials including magazines and or flyers on glossy paper or saturated with inks and dozens of types of plastic. That trash should be collected for incineration in modern, energy producing facilities.  Incineration reduces trash to about 10% of the mass incinerated.

Banning plastic thingies does not address the problem of developing an integrated recycling system.

We need people working on robotic sorting of household trash.

We need to develop a recycling system on a scale that warrants separate recycle pickups and allows a profit for recyclers.

We need to take a deep breath and develop a plan of attack that will ensure over 60% of household waste can be recycled.

If we can accomplish that, people will support and use a recycling program. Brow-beating people into supporting half-vast recycling efforts that are seeing landfills grow faster each year and exporting our waste to foreign nations is ridiculous.

We don’t need federal interference unless the federal government is going to stop production and imports of plastics that cannot be recycled or are biodegradable. This, is an opportunity for McKenna to finally do something useful.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


** George Heyman, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, has issued the following statement with respect to the Government of Canada’s announcement to ban single-use plastics as early as 2021:

British Columbia welcomes news that the federal government is moving toward a strategy to reduce, better recycle and ban certain plastics. Reducing plastic waste must be a joint effort by all Canadians and all levels of government. I look forward to working with my federal, provincial and territorial counterparts to reduce plastic waste and to profile some of the good work already underway in our province ....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more