Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Plastic thingies are not the problem – it is the material they are made from. If a plastic fork or spoon is made of recyclable or biodegradable material, single use is not an issue


Government to ban single-use plastic straws, cotton swabs, drink stirrers, plates, cutlery, some plastic bags all on the list
Hannah Thibedeau ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 09, 2019

The Trudeau government will ban single-use plastics as early as 2021, CBC News has learned from a government source ... this is part of a larger strategy to tackle the plastic pollution problem that the government is expected to announce Monday.


... according to the source, the full list of plastics to be banned by the federal government will follow the model chosen by the European Union ... fast-food containers and cups made of expanded polystyrene, which is similar to white styrofoam, will also be banned.

... all of those countries have moved to curb plastic pollution, some of them with laws to reduce the consumption of plastics.



The originality of thinking by Trudeau and McKenna is staggering. Parroting the EU which is vastly different from Canada in almost every aspect – geography, size, population density, traffic infrastructure and climate for starters, is silly.

The regulation of local sales and services is a provincial**, not a federal jurisdiction. There is nothing to give the federal jurisdiction over local issues. The Trudeau Liberals are trolling for votes and ignoring the constitution – again.

Managing local services, including waste removal and disposal is a provincial subject and responsibility. Trudeau is trying to cherry pick an emotional issue out of a larger subject. Is he really ready to take on waste removal and disposal as a federal responsibility?          

Plastic thingies are not the problem – it is the material they are made from. If a plastic fork or spoon is made of recyclable or biodegradable material, single use is not an issue.

Incinerator technology has made great strides in reducing landfill problems, but we are not even in the picture.  Governments tend to deal with symptoms while ignoring the underlying illness. Environmentalists bemoan public refusal to sort recyclables from their trash. So much trash is not recyclable that the household is left with a large mound of trash that hardly makes sorting worthwhile.

The Trudeau solution, which is to make life difficult for consumers, is inane. His government should look at banning the manufacture and import of plastics that are not either biodegradable or recyclable.

Manufacturers will find ways to create products that are less harmful to the environment, however they have no incentive to do so at present. Give them a tax allowance for research and development of environmentally friendly plastic materials.  After that, specialty plastics used in manufacturing, machinery parts, equipment and vehicles can be dealt with separately.


Recycle programs are bogged down in having to sort out useful plastic from heaps of plastic that is not.

The key is to reduce the plastics that can’t be recycled.

Recycle programs don’t want various materials including magazines and or flyers on glossy paper or saturated with inks and dozens of types of plastic. That trash should be collected for incineration in modern, energy producing facilities.  Incineration reduces trash to about 10% of the mass incinerated.

Banning plastic thingies does not address the problem of developing an integrated recycling system.

We need people working on robotic sorting of household trash.

We need to develop a recycling system on a scale that warrants separate recycle pickups and allows a profit for recyclers.

We need to take a deep breath and develop a plan of attack that will ensure over 60% of household waste can be recycled.

If we can accomplish that, people will support and use a recycling program. Brow-beating people into supporting half-vast recycling efforts that are seeing landfills grow faster each year and exporting our waste to foreign nations is ridiculous.

We don’t need federal interference unless the federal government is going to stop production and imports of plastics that cannot be recycled or are biodegradable. This, is an opportunity for McKenna to finally do something useful.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


** George Heyman, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, has issued the following statement with respect to the Government of Canada’s announcement to ban single-use plastics as early as 2021:

British Columbia welcomes news that the federal government is moving toward a strategy to reduce, better recycle and ban certain plastics. Reducing plastic waste must be a joint effort by all Canadians and all levels of government. I look forward to working with my federal, provincial and territorial counterparts to reduce plastic waste and to profile some of the good work already underway in our province ....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more