Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER: Whether or not “genocide,” is an appropriate definition, for the record of violence against indigenous women, it is less important than doing something about the problem


LANGUAGE IS NOT the boss of us ~~ An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
Used with permission, with credit to CFJC Today


We follow its rules when they suit us. We change language through common use and misuse. The English of today is much different than it was 100 or 200 years ago.

Image Credit: Mel Rothenburger
This week, we’re changing the definition of “genocide.” Up until now, the word has referred to the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, cultural or political group.

The final report on the uses the term “Canadian genocide” to describe the subject of the inquiry.

The term has stimulated a national debate on whether use of the word is accurate.

In discussing the “G” word it’s important to note the debate goes way beyond the title of the inquiry, referencing colonialism, racism and historic grievances. According to the report, “Genocide is the sum of the social practices, assumptions and actions detailed in this report.”

In other words, it chooses the word to describe its findings, then concludes that therefore the definition is accurate.

We can easily get bogged down in this debate to the detriment of the report itself. By giving such an inflammatory word such prominence, the authors undoubtedly believe it reinforces the need for action.

Instead, it detracts from it — the 231 recommendations are virtually missing in action from the debate.

Whether or not “genocide,” under our previous understanding of the word, is an appropriate definition for the record of violence against indigenous women is less important than doing something about the problem.

If we want to redefine “genocide” within the Canadian experience, we can do so.
We can define a “Canadian genocide” for ourselves. Better to spend less time agonizing over that and spend more on the report’s recommendations.


I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.






Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops and newspaper editor. He publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. 

He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more