Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER: Whether or not “genocide,” is an appropriate definition, for the record of violence against indigenous women, it is less important than doing something about the problem


LANGUAGE IS NOT the boss of us ~~ An editorial by Mel Rothenburger.
Used with permission, with credit to CFJC Today


We follow its rules when they suit us. We change language through common use and misuse. The English of today is much different than it was 100 or 200 years ago.

Image Credit: Mel Rothenburger
This week, we’re changing the definition of “genocide.” Up until now, the word has referred to the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, cultural or political group.

The final report on the uses the term “Canadian genocide” to describe the subject of the inquiry.

The term has stimulated a national debate on whether use of the word is accurate.

In discussing the “G” word it’s important to note the debate goes way beyond the title of the inquiry, referencing colonialism, racism and historic grievances. According to the report, “Genocide is the sum of the social practices, assumptions and actions detailed in this report.”

In other words, it chooses the word to describe its findings, then concludes that therefore the definition is accurate.

We can easily get bogged down in this debate to the detriment of the report itself. By giving such an inflammatory word such prominence, the authors undoubtedly believe it reinforces the need for action.

Instead, it detracts from it — the 231 recommendations are virtually missing in action from the debate.

Whether or not “genocide,” under our previous understanding of the word, is an appropriate definition for the record of violence against indigenous women is less important than doing something about the problem.

If we want to redefine “genocide” within the Canadian experience, we can do so.
We can define a “Canadian genocide” for ourselves. Better to spend less time agonizing over that and spend more on the report’s recommendations.


I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.






Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops and newspaper editor. He publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. 

He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more