Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

What do you think about the Canadian Senate, Equalization Payments, United Nations, Citizenship and Immigration, Human Rights Tribunal, Coastal Tanker ban, Carbon Tax, Official Languages Act, CBC?


Three days ago, John Feldsted, a regular contributor of opinion commentaries to this blogsite, emailed a 22-question survey to me. He stated that no candidate appearing on our doorstep in October’s federal election. is likely to ask them, because as he stated, “They fear your answers.”

I’ve spent the past couple of days thinking about the questions, and answers that would be a fit for me – you can see them below.  They cover a broad spectrum, and it will be interesting to see what the compiled answers turn out to be.

I have included John’s email address at the bottom of this, so feel free to complete the questionnaire, and forward your answers as well.

/  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /


1.   Should we abolish the monarchy in Canada?  ... No, it is part of our heritage

2.   Should we change the Citizenship and Immigration Act to prohibit dual citizenship?  ... Yes.  People should either want to be Canadian, or not

3.   Should we stop the flow of illegal migrants into Canada?  ... Yes

4.   Should we abolish Human Rights Tribunals and have courts deal with complaints?  ... No

5.   Should we abolish the Senate?  ... my preference would be NO, however I think it should have an equal number of senators, based on the population of their province.  That said, I believe the Maritime provinces should be one region, as should Northern Canada

6.   Should we repeal section 318(2) of the Criminal Code regarding hate speech?  ... I am unsure on this question.  This section provides two options for punishment.  The first being that ‘an individual found guilty of an indictable offense would be liable for a term not exceeding two years’ – or second ‘an offense punishable on summary conviction’.  I think punishment should fit the degree of the crime, in which case perhaps only option number two should be required?

7.   Should we require that 70% of provinces representing at least 50% of the population agree to the calculation formula for equalization payments?  ... Yes – no additional comment required



8.   Should laws respecting oil tanker traffic on the west coast apply to all coastal areas?  ... Yes.  This coastal tanker ban on coastal BC is little more than political payback to enviro’s who helped elect Justin Trudeau’s Liberals in 2015, in the hopes they do so again in 2019.  There is no reason there should be a ban or the West Coast, if it doesn’t also apply to the East Coast -- the same conditions apply.

9.   Should federal carbon taxes by applied to imported petroleum products?  ... Yes ... and the tax applied should be higher.  Most oil shipped by tanker to the East Coast, comes from countries with lack to little enviro protection.  It is more than unfair it should arrive in our country without the same taxes applied.  Canadian oil is the cleanest in the world, and yet it has heavy taxes as though it is somehow a poison

10.Should our governments be prohibited from contributing to charities?  ... Yes 

11.Should we continue to provide financial aid to foreign nations and organizations?  ... Yes; however, the mandate to provide should be tightened up.  We shouldn't be sending money to dictatorship that take most of the financial aid and tuck it away in hidden bank accounts, leaving little to actually provide aid to citizens.  Financial aid should be tied to measurable markers of improving the health and safety of citizens of the country receiving it

12.Should we continue to contribute billion$ to the United Nations? ... No.  The UN has become of the most toothless organizations in the world, with countries run be dictatorships being allowed on a multitude of panels that require real democracy. The UN should get back to protecting countries being over-run by neighbouring countries, using military action when needed --- providing humanitarian care for countries suffering from natural disasters – etc.

13.Should we rescind the Official Languages Act? ... No

14.Should we reinstate the death penalty for murder?  ... Yes, but for defined reasons (ie murder / rape of a child ... murder of police officer ... ethnic hate murders ... etc)

15.Should we support western provinces if they elect to leave Canada?  ... Yes
 
16.Should we privatize the CBC?  ... No. That said, the CBC should get out of live streaming of specialty music channels – there are enough private companies doing this ... not counting News programing, the majority of programs aired should be Canadian produced ...

17.Should we make the promotion of foreign legal systems unlawful in Canada?  ... an emphatic Yes

18.Should we insist that all immigrants actively assimilate into our society?  Assimilate is such a harsh word (we are the Borg – resistance is futile).  I would prefer that when immigrants arrive, they should be required to take a program or workshop that provide information on the history of our country (including the role migrants played in building our nation), along with the role, rights, and obligations of citizens in a democracy.  This would be separate from requirements for Citizenship

19.Should we deport residents who have not assimilated within a five-year span?  .... No.  Who is going to determine who has and who hasn't?  What degree of assimilation would be needed?  This would provide too much room for political interference

20.Should we eliminate deducting union dues from taxable income?  ... No, but paying them should not be mandatory

21.Should we decertify labour unions who engage in political activity?  ... No however they should lose their non-profit status (if they have that?) ... or union members should not be allowed to declare as tax deduction

22.Should we decertify non-profit organizations who receive foreign funding? ... Yes 

The questionnaire John sent out only required a simple Yes or No.  With that in
mind, don’t feel the need to provide answers --- I have done this simply to hopefully provoke thoughtful what reflection on how and why you might want to answer the above questions.

Those who wish can return completed surveys to jfeldsted@shaw.ca with the subject line Political Survey.

He has indicated that he will ... try to compile a summary of answers during the summer if time permits

AND FINALLY .... if you care to share any of the thoughts you might have on any of the questions being asked by John Feldsted, please take a moment to share them in the Comments Section below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more