Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Another one from the ‘OH REALLY!’ file ... news on how wonderful our BC NDP government is


From Prince George this morning, our BC NDP government had the audacity to tell us they are 'leading by example' as .... many government buildings will become smarter and more energy efficient in an effort to tackle climate change, thanks to the Province's new CleanBC Government Buildings Program.

"The B.C. government is leading by example and walking the talk when it comes to building a better future for British Columbians," Jinny Sims, Minister of Citizens' Services, was heard to say.

"The new CleanBC Government Buildings Program will help government facilities consume less energy, reduce emissions, create local jobs and save British Columbians money."

Well that's easy for her to say and do, and easy for John Horgan’s government -- they're using OUR tax dollars to do it, and that’s definitely easy.  They just go in to the piggy-bank called general revenues, which they continue to fill by increasingly our money away from us.

But wait a minute -- shouldn’t the BC government be using more of the money, from the Carbon Tax grab which was imposed on us 11 years ago, to provide more help to BC homeowners?

On February 19, 2008, the Government of British Columbia announced its intention to implement a carbon tax of C$10 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions (2.41 cents per litre on gasoline) beginning July 1, 2008, making BC the first North American jurisdiction to implement such a tax ~~ Wikipedia

And now that Carbon Tax is $40 / tonne ... FOUR TIMES what it started out at!

As we are all well aware, the Carbon Tax was to be revenue neutral. IT IS NOT and has simply become another revenue stream for the government as they continue to syphon more and more of our family’s financial resources away from us.

According to our NDP government, energy retrofits generally result in a minimum of 25 percent energy savings ... and major energy retrofits, which also include building envelope improvements, could deliver savings of more than 40 percent.

Here’s what would actually be easy for Jenny Simms and John Horgan.  Take the excess Carbon Tax revenue you are stealing from us, and increase the fund for homeowners to retro-fit homes to make them more energy efficient – that’s what will really ‘... save British Columbians money’.

The NDP’s current budget, overseen by Finance Minister Carole James, projects an increase from the Carbon Tax of $2 billion dollars over three years.

Right now, the BC government is providing homeowners upgrading their windows and doors, to more energy efficient models, and the same with natural gas furnaces, of up to a combined $2,700.


According to HomeGuide.com the average cost to replace windows in a three-bedroom home would run between $4,500 to $9,600. I’m going to guess the low end is economy and the top end is highest rated.  The plan is to be more energy efficient so ... $9,600 it is.

And a good to better door, installed, will likely run $750 to $1,000 or more – so a front and back door ... $1,500+.

Then we come to the average cost to install a high-efficiency furnace in Canada; $3,000 to $5,500 based on installation requirements, size, and model. Again, the plan is to increase energy efficiency so it’s $5,500 I’m using.

Windows ... $9,600
Doors ... $1,500
High-efficiency furnace ... $5,500

That means the APPROXIMATE cost to retro-fit would be $16,600 (that’s simply my guesstimate) ... and the retro-fit incentive from the BC government is .... (drum roll please) ... $2,700.

So, here’s a suggestion Premier Horgan – take that extra $2 billion dollars and add it to the current $2,700 incentive.


That’s ... leading by example to build a better future for British Columbians.

That’s ... doing what IS NEEDED to help British Columbians save money.

That’s ... ensuring that the revenue taken from us, in the form of a carbon tax, remain revenue neutral.

It’s tough finding accurate numbers, but it seems that the cost to heat the average BC home, with a 92% high-efficiency furnace, is +/- $1,000 per year.

That means the estimated energy retro-fit 25% savings could put an average of $250 a year back in our pocket ... and at the top end an estimated savings of 40% per year would mean $400. And that’s not even considering what the increased retro fit incentive would save consumers

I think I’d rather have those energy savings back in my pocket, than going into general revenues.   

Which would you rather see?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more