Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: We elect people to represent us and ensure that governments provide the services they are responsible for ... meantime, personal responsibility is the basis of democracy


NDP's 2019 election platform promises mental, dental, hearing coverage for all. CBC News got an early look at what’s inside the NDP platform
David Thurton ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 16, 2019

The NDP will be the first Canadian federal party to unveil an election platform that promises to drastically expand Canada's health care system to include, not just pharmacare, but mental, dental, eye and hearing coverage for all citizens.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh ... (gave the) CBC an early look at the platform.
     
What else does the NDP platform promise to do?
  • Commit to fully and equitably fund health education and other services in Indigenous communities.
  • Create an action plan to prevent suicide.
  • Cap and reduce tuition fees and student loan interest, with an eventual goal of free post-secondary education.
  • Ban unpaid internships.
  • Introduce federal incentives for zero-emissions automobiles and prioritize cars made in Canada.
  • Invest $1 billion in affordable childcare in 2020.
  • Focus on revitalizing industries like forestry, fisheries and agriculture.
  • Put a price cap on cellphone and internet bills and introduce a telecommunications bill of rights.
  • Close tax loopholes and introduce a one per cent "wealth tax" on personal earnings over $20 million.
  • Increase access to public transit, including along rural routes cut off by Greyhound service discontinuation.
  • Power Canada with net carbon-free electricity by 2030.
  • Ban single-use plastics
  • End veteran homelessness
  • Launch a basic income pilot project
  • Strengthen the air passenger bill of rights
  • Create an affordable housing plan that includes construction of more low-cost and co-operative housing across the country.



The gap between what political parties believe we will fall for, and what we need from them, has never been wider. The differences between what political parties offer, what government is responsible for, what we really need, and what we can afford leaves us breathless.


These issues are interconnected, not isolated. We can’t spend what we don’t have, and with each passing year Canadians have less money left for discretionary spending.

We cannot continue to fund irresponsible government largess. We do not need political idealism. That is little more than daydreaming saying, ‘wouldn’t it be wonderful if only we could’, and then realizing the dream involves doubling our income taxes and so we get on with life as it is.

Politicians do not govern us.

We elect people to represent us and ensure that governments provide the services they are responsible for ... as well as spend and tax prudently and responsibly. No government may tax us for more than is needed to carry out its responsibilities to the public.

Personal responsibility is the basis of democracy.

Unless we are prepared to accept responsibility for our actions and behaviours a civil, democratic, lawful, orderly and peaceful society and its institutions will crumble to dust. We already see evidence of rot in our institutions.

Governance should be administered at the level closest to the people.


Municipal governance is very effective for the most part. However, when municipalities grow into large towns and cities, the connection between the governing body, and those they serve, are diminished and finally lost. The result is decisions made for the benefit those governing rather than for those governed. 

In general, governance bodies exist to provide services communities cannot afford on their own. Our constitution sets out a list of subject’s provincial governments are responsible for. They are largely of a local nature, too costly for municipalities, but needed by the people of the province.

There is a second list of subjects for which the federal government is responsible, and they are different from the subjects listed for the provinces. Hospitals and health care are provincial subjects.

Provinces cannot enact law in federal subjects, and the federal government cannot enact laws in provincial subjects. The federal and provincial governments operate in separate spheres; the federal government is not ‘superior’ or above the provinces.

Our provincial governments already provide some drug coverage, and have experimented with mass drug purchases to keep costs down. The introduction of generic drugs in the 1970s reduced costs considerably. If full drug coverage was affordable and viable, some provinces would already be providing PharmaCare for their residents.


What is missing from party election platforms is sound planning to grow our economy to provide the taxable incomes to support the services Canadians need. We cannot continue unending deficit spending. We need to generate more income to sustain the basic services we receive. We cannot allow political parties to continue to ignore spending restraints based on income.

Political party delusions that they can buy our votes, by promoting in-affordable programs, is good reason for not supporting them.

The majority of Canadians are more fiscally responsible, and able to set realistic spending priorities, than any federal government we have endured during the past 50 years. The days of people in political parties and government serving their personal interests and helping their friends, must end.

We need, responsible adult supervision of our federal government. 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

MIKE RIGGS -- The candidates who win are the ones who can hold both sides without losing control of the message

If you step back and look at the BC Conservative leadership race, which begin 81 days ago on January 16th, the real difference is not experience, it is approach. Caroline Elliott understands where voters are right now. People are tired of being managed, talked down to, and boxed into rigid policy frameworks. They want someone who reflects their concerns but can still operate in the real world. That is where she separates from someone like Kerry-Lynne Findlay. Findlay represents a more traditional style of politics. She brings experience, but also a more controlled and cautious approach that can feel rigid at a time when voters want responsiveness and adaptability. Elliott is positioning herself differently. She leans more socially conservative in tone, which connects with a base that feels ignored, but she is also showing a willingness to be pragmatic. That balance is what actually wins elections. If you are too rigid, you stall out. If you are too soft, you lose your base. The candida...

Labels

Show more