Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: We elect people to represent us and ensure that governments provide the services they are responsible for ... meantime, personal responsibility is the basis of democracy


NDP's 2019 election platform promises mental, dental, hearing coverage for all. CBC News got an early look at what’s inside the NDP platform
David Thurton ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 16, 2019

The NDP will be the first Canadian federal party to unveil an election platform that promises to drastically expand Canada's health care system to include, not just pharmacare, but mental, dental, eye and hearing coverage for all citizens.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh ... (gave the) CBC an early look at the platform.
     
What else does the NDP platform promise to do?
  • Commit to fully and equitably fund health education and other services in Indigenous communities.
  • Create an action plan to prevent suicide.
  • Cap and reduce tuition fees and student loan interest, with an eventual goal of free post-secondary education.
  • Ban unpaid internships.
  • Introduce federal incentives for zero-emissions automobiles and prioritize cars made in Canada.
  • Invest $1 billion in affordable childcare in 2020.
  • Focus on revitalizing industries like forestry, fisheries and agriculture.
  • Put a price cap on cellphone and internet bills and introduce a telecommunications bill of rights.
  • Close tax loopholes and introduce a one per cent "wealth tax" on personal earnings over $20 million.
  • Increase access to public transit, including along rural routes cut off by Greyhound service discontinuation.
  • Power Canada with net carbon-free electricity by 2030.
  • Ban single-use plastics
  • End veteran homelessness
  • Launch a basic income pilot project
  • Strengthen the air passenger bill of rights
  • Create an affordable housing plan that includes construction of more low-cost and co-operative housing across the country.



The gap between what political parties believe we will fall for, and what we need from them, has never been wider. The differences between what political parties offer, what government is responsible for, what we really need, and what we can afford leaves us breathless.


These issues are interconnected, not isolated. We can’t spend what we don’t have, and with each passing year Canadians have less money left for discretionary spending.

We cannot continue to fund irresponsible government largess. We do not need political idealism. That is little more than daydreaming saying, ‘wouldn’t it be wonderful if only we could’, and then realizing the dream involves doubling our income taxes and so we get on with life as it is.

Politicians do not govern us.

We elect people to represent us and ensure that governments provide the services they are responsible for ... as well as spend and tax prudently and responsibly. No government may tax us for more than is needed to carry out its responsibilities to the public.

Personal responsibility is the basis of democracy.

Unless we are prepared to accept responsibility for our actions and behaviours a civil, democratic, lawful, orderly and peaceful society and its institutions will crumble to dust. We already see evidence of rot in our institutions.

Governance should be administered at the level closest to the people.


Municipal governance is very effective for the most part. However, when municipalities grow into large towns and cities, the connection between the governing body, and those they serve, are diminished and finally lost. The result is decisions made for the benefit those governing rather than for those governed. 

In general, governance bodies exist to provide services communities cannot afford on their own. Our constitution sets out a list of subject’s provincial governments are responsible for. They are largely of a local nature, too costly for municipalities, but needed by the people of the province.

There is a second list of subjects for which the federal government is responsible, and they are different from the subjects listed for the provinces. Hospitals and health care are provincial subjects.

Provinces cannot enact law in federal subjects, and the federal government cannot enact laws in provincial subjects. The federal and provincial governments operate in separate spheres; the federal government is not ‘superior’ or above the provinces.

Our provincial governments already provide some drug coverage, and have experimented with mass drug purchases to keep costs down. The introduction of generic drugs in the 1970s reduced costs considerably. If full drug coverage was affordable and viable, some provinces would already be providing PharmaCare for their residents.


What is missing from party election platforms is sound planning to grow our economy to provide the taxable incomes to support the services Canadians need. We cannot continue unending deficit spending. We need to generate more income to sustain the basic services we receive. We cannot allow political parties to continue to ignore spending restraints based on income.

Political party delusions that they can buy our votes, by promoting in-affordable programs, is good reason for not supporting them.

The majority of Canadians are more fiscally responsible, and able to set realistic spending priorities, than any federal government we have endured during the past 50 years. The days of people in political parties and government serving their personal interests and helping their friends, must end.

We need, responsible adult supervision of our federal government. 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more