Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SCOTT ANDERSON -- If India was Justin Trudeau's retreat from Moscow, and the Wilson-Raybould Affair his Waterloo, there is an important difference between Trudeau and Napoleon


At a recent Southern Interior Local Government Association (SILGA) Conference in Penticton in April, I had the honour of listening to the keynote speaker, Joe Roberts, recount his transition from an addict on Vancouver's skid row, to the CEO of a multi million-dollar company -- and ultimately founder of “The Push for Change Foundation,” which involved him crossing Canada from east to west on foot pushing a shopping cart to bring awareness to homelessness.

Using a PowerPoint presentation, he recounted his 16-month trip through rain, hail, snow and smoke, and when he arrived at the centerpiece frame he paused, clearly expecting a burst of applause. After a moment's hesitation at the smattering of half-hearted clapping and tittering, he laughed awkwardly and said, “well, that used to get quite a different reaction, um...,” he paused, “...before.” And everyone laughed.

The frame in question? Joe being greeted on Parliament Hill by Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada.

Before” was a time left undefined, but it takes no leap of imagination to conjure up halcyon visions of “sunny ways” -- flowing locks, pretty socks, and endless selfies.


Before” was a time of promises and dreams and brave new worlds, where women would thrive, men would behave, and all the world would stop and gape in awe because “Canada was back.”

Gone were the dark days of the dreaded Stephen Harper, who boringly led us through a Great Global Recession we barely felt, because now the good times were rolling, a new day was upon us, and all wonderful things were possible, even probable. But many of us saw something missing, being the cynics that we are.

Through the haze of virtue signalling we perceived a lack of substance. I wrote at some point in Trudeau's ascendancy:? Young, hip, sunny and pretty, aflutter on the pages of Vogue and its European counterparts, Trudeau the Younger promenades across the international stage, a princeling in a tailored suit. Fashion is taking the western world by storm this season, and Trudeau exemplifies our Antoinettian age of political whimsy.

All would be well if the world were but a cat-walk.

In fairness, Trudeau might still be in the superstar stratosphere had he settled for cat-walking, but he made promises too, as if he were a serious politician. He claimed to be a “feminist,” he claimed to be the harbinger of open doors and sunny days, a new type of politics, a guru of diversity, a saviour of the environment, a bringer of weed. He was, in the “before,” something of a tabula rasa and therefore all things to all people, but above all an emblem of hope, promise, and hip.

A veritable 21st century Canadian Napoleon ... and then, one day, “before” was gone.

Unlike Napoleon, who began with nothing and gained an empire, (before losing it with a world-historical bang) Trudeau began with his father's empire and lost it in a gradual progression of folly that started almost as soon as he was elected.


It's received wisdom these days that the Indian fiasco was the moment the Trudeau ascendancy ended, but it wasn't really.

The India trip simply marked the moment a heretofore fawning Canadian press – including even the CBC, itself existentially dependent upon the Trudeau machine – could no longer choke back its collective gorge and keep protecting him from his own actions. Especially once the international press caught wind of it and exposed our Prime Ministerial diplomatic slapstick to billions of people.

It's also customary to point at the Wilson-Raybould affair as the final gasp of the Trudeau PMO -- but it wasn't really. The regime was on faltering life support by the time Wilson-Raybould failed for the last time to save the Prime Minister from himself.

And that brings up another point. If India was Trudeau's retreat from Moscow, and the Wilson-Raybould Affair his Waterloo, there is an important difference between Trudeau and Napoleon.

Both lost, but Napoleon faced both the Russian winter and Wellington ... Trudeau faced only himself.

Far from being the turning points they are perceived to be today; the India trip and the Wilson-Raybould affair were simply markers along a crumbling path of Trudeau's own making. Simply put, Trudeau's downfall was an incremental fading of promise.

More about that next week in Part 2.


— Scott Anderson comments and analyzes from a bluntly conservative point of view.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more