Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PM Justin Trudeau expressing anger at six premiers on television, rather than making an attempt to negotiate an amicable resolution, is a strange way to “gather us together”


Premier Kenney issued the following statement following the federal government’s decision on Bill C-69:

I’m very disappointed to learn that during the night the federal government rejected the vast majority of amendments made by the Senate of Canada to Bill C-69, after thousands of hours of close study and witness testimony. We commend the Senate for its thoroughness in proposing over 180 constructive amendments, including all of those put forward by the previous Alberta government.

“This is not a question of conservative versus liberal: it’s a question of common sense. Every major political party in Alberta shares the same concerns about this bill, as do the majority of provinces. This week, six premiers wrote to the prime minister underlining our urgent concern and asking that he respect the constructive amendments brought forward by senators, including the majority of senators he appointed.

And today, Premier Legault added Quebec’s opposition to the current form of the bill. Without substantial amendments, the bill clearly interferes in areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction and undermines the future of Canada’s energy sector, investor confidence and national unity.
 
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Prime Minister Trudeau came to office promising a federalism of openness with the provinces and instead we are regrettably getting a door slammed in our faces. We are making one last appeal to the federal government: please listen to job creators, many First Nations, provincial and territorial governments, and to the Senate of Canada. Do not dismiss their hard work and the constructive amendments they made.

My message to Prime Minister Trudeau is simple: this is not a partisan issue – it is a matter of restoring international confidence in Canada at a time when our reputation as a place to invest is at risk. Without the Senate’s amendments, this bill will drive away more jobs and investment from Canada. It is not too late for the federal government, the House and the Senate to do the right thing and sustain the Senate’s amendments. It’s not too late to do the right thing.”


Meantime, a story in the CBC today included the following:

Centre-right premiers demanding that the federal government accept compromises on pending legislation to regulate natural resource development are themselves threatening national unity, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Tuesday.

"It's absolutely irresponsible for conservative premiers to be threatening our national unity if they don't get their way," Trudeau told reporters today.

"The fundamental job of any Canadian prime minister is to hold this country together, to gather us together and move forward in the right way. And anyone who wants to be prime minister, like Andrew Scheer, needs to condemn those attacks on national unity."

Trudeau made the remarks a day after the premiers of Ontario, New Brunswick, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and the Northwest Territories wrote him to demand he make concessions on two key government bills.

And what does regular contributor, and political analyst John Feldsted have to say about Trudeau’s thoughts on what the Premiers of nearly 60% of Canada’s population had to say?

It is possible that Trudeau finally ‘gets it’. Provinces outside of central Canada are fed up with central governance that impoverishes them.


The PM’s angry demeanor and words look like an aristocrat’s reaction to news that the household staff has declared a strike, "The fundamental job of any Canadian prime minister is to hold this country together, to gather us together and move forward in the right way.”    


Expressing anger at six premiers on television, rather than making an attempt to negotiate an amicable resolution, is a strange way to “gather us together”. The petulance is inappropriate and divisive. Provinces are not going to ‘knuckle under’ to imperious decrees from Ottawa.

Trudeau, for the first time, is frightened, and Premiers are rebelling.

Worse, Ontario is in the mix. Those premiers represent 21.7 million Canadians, nearly 60% of the population. If one more province joins the group, it will have the power to force constitutional amendments.

Seven provinces with over 50% of the population can either toss, or substantially change, the hated equalization clause, dump the Senate or change the Senate representation to 6 senators per province.

Trudeau may regret bypassing Ford and Ontario to deal directly with Toronto. That arrogance has put federal authority in serious jeopardy.  

Those words again from political analyst and commentator John Feldsted, of Winnipeg.  

It definitely appears like troubles brewing, and that we are getting closer and closer to the boiling point over the issue a resources being able to access markets through-out the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more