Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS -- What did the Prime Minister actually say? The promise was to “ban harmful single-use plastics as early as 2021”. So, the actual promise has no firm deadline whatsoever

Conservative MP Dan Albas

This Prime Minister (Justin Trudeau) has a habit of making promises. It appears this plan to reduce single use plastics is well intended but short on details

As the Official Opposition, it is our job to hold the government accountable and at the same time to provide information to citizens that the government may not widely share or present in great detail. An example of this can be found in the recent media headline “Trudeau announces ban on single-use plastics by 2021”.

This was an actual media headline quoted directly from a Global news story.

I believe most Canadians are supportive of the idea of taking action on the growing problem of plastic pollution that can have devastating impacts, particularly in sensitive marine habitats.  Often these sensitive marine habitats are polluted by developing countries that do not have proper waste disposal and recycling systems, or rogue fishing operations that break maritime waste management protocols.

However, as Canadians, we should always look to make improvements to ensure a clean environment.

The idea of taking action on this front requires a credible plan in order to be successful and -- on that note -- the Prime Minister’s plan to ban single use plastics is deserving of scrutiny. For starters, the Prime Minister actually made no promise to ban single use plastics by 2021.

The date of 2021 is an interesting one as the leader of the NDP made a similar promise recently, only setting their date at 2022.

So what did the Prime Minister actually say?  The promise was to “ban harmful single-use plastics as early as 2021” --- Note the word "early".  So, the actual promise has no firm deadline whatsoever.

One may also ask what is exactly meant by a “harmful single use plastic”? 


In this case the promise suggests this will be determined by “scientific evidence” and “where warranted”. In other words there is no clear definition.

What we do know about the Canadian plastic sector is that it has estimated annual sales of $10 billion in plastic resin and a further $25 billion in products for a total value of $35 billion, roughly 5% of sales in our domestic manufacturing sector.

From a waste perspective, some of the most common forms of plastic waste are found in plastic packaging that comprises 43% of total plastic waste. Automotive plastic waste is 9%, textiles 7% and electronic equipment is 7%. Other uses make up the remainder.

A few more important questions remain unanswered, such as:

  1. What is the specific timeline? 
  2. What happens when there is not an alternative replacement product to a single use plastic, such as in the medical field? 
  3. What would be the total costs to achieve this plan and who would pay for it? 
  4. Since provinces have jurisdiction over waste management and recycling, have they been consulted and are all provinces supportive?


If I sound skeptical, it is largely because I am. It appears this plan to reduce single use plastics is well meaning, but short on details ... more so with a fall election in the offing.

This Prime Minister has a habit of making promises. For example:

A balanced budget in 2019 ... that the 2015 election was to be the last to use first past the post ... and a Liberal government would not use omnibus budget bills that he makes no effort to fulfill.


Here is my question this week:

Do you believe this is a credible plan to reduce single use plastics?

I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call toll free 1 (800) 665-8711.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more