Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Governments must never be allowed to tax us for more than an adequate amount to provide us with the services they are responsible for; we have lost sight of that axiom


Here's what everyone seems to be missing in the PBO's climate policy math. Arguments over the carbon tax overlook the fact that every alternative comes with its own costs
Aaron Wherry ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 15, 2019

The simple math of climate policy rarely makes for straightforward politics.

Consider this week's analysis by the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO), and the respective responses of the Liberals and Conservatives.

Canada's greenhouse gas emissions are projected to decline to 592 megatonnes by 2030 — a significant reduction, but still 79 megatonnes above the target to which this country has committed. In the interests of framing future policy actions, the PBO estimated the sort of additional carbon levy that might be needed to eliminate those remaining megatonnes.

According to the PBO, that new carbon tax, applied broadly, could start at $6 per tonne in 2023 and rise to $52 per tonne by 2030.

The Conservatives were, perhaps predictably, aghast at the suggestion. But that puts Andrew Scheer's Conservative opposition in the odd position of complaining about the cost of meeting an international target that was first established by Stephen Harper's Conservative government — a government in which several of Scheer's frontbenchers were cabinet ministers.



Carbon taxes are an experiment in socialist social engineering. Calculating carbon tax amounts hides something far more sinister. The federal government has no power to impose a carbon tax. 

If this government can force us into accepting carbon taxes as a valid means of reducing oil and gas consumption, it has won an important psychological war.

The next step could be to tax electrical power bills to reduce consumption. That avoids the costs of building new generating facilities to meet increasing demands. A few people will expire from cold in the winter and heat in the summer, but it worked with petroleum; it can work with electricity.

Once the precedent is set, the government has unlimited powers to tax us into submission to its will. If you find that consistent with participatory democracy and governments elected to serve our collective needs, you are more broad-
minded than I.

Governments must never be allowed to tax us for more than an adequate amount to provide us with the services they are responsible for. We have lost sight of that axiom.

We have allowed governments to tax far in excess of what is needed to provide services.

That is the equivalent of handing a minor $1,000 in cash, a bottle of whiskey, keys to a car and wishing him or her a happy evening on the town.

Our electoral system should produce a parliament of sober, responsible people to govern on our behalf. I will repeat; to govern on our behalf, not to govern us. That does not seem to happen. There is too much money sloshing around Ottawa not to tempt governments into spending extravagantly, foolishly and irresponsibly.

The thought of our government taxing us to infringe on our freedom of choice should have us rioting in the streets. Global warming is a trojan horse that make subjecting us to government decree and encroachment on our rights and freedoms look palatable.

It is not ... it is the root of totalitarianism that will replace our democracy if we are not careful.  


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more