Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Cordelia Barber: The paradox of authenticity in the transparent society

The paradox of authenticity in the transparent society.

Everybody wants their politicians to be transparent and authentic.... Until they see the real human. Then it's "No, no, no; not like THAT".

In the transparency society, we not only crave authenticity, but we punish things that are not "smooth", and seemingly easy to understand. The harder an issue, the less we like it.

We live in an era where there is so much information, and we crave being able to sort and make sense of it as quickly and easily as possible because, well, we're all really rather busy. What we make time for in the world of today says a lot about us. What we absolutely do not have time for ends up now saying *more* about us, because it is the opposite of transparency or smoothness. 

When politicians refuse, deflect, or don't address something, it becomes a larger elephant in the room, even if only to those that it matters to. 

People on the right are stoked Carney isn't as focused on the environment as he began claiming he would be -- on the left, they're furious.

When inconsistencies arise, this is "roughness", or I'd call it more fine-grainededness or granularity. The more granular something is, the less likely we are to chew on it unless we have a really good reason to. It just goes unprocessed because we're busy. We overlook things that don't matter to us, and hyper focus on the things that do. 

This isn't "new", but it is increasingly more common to not be able to see the forest for the trees in politics. But everyone *insists* that the granular thing they're chewing on is one of the most important, or is an indicator, or is the heaviest thing in a weighted average.... Whatever it might be.

We've lost nuance, and politicians (especially the non-politicky ones) have a LOT harder time actually governing now (per the article) than they did before. Everything is about perception, because of the transparency society.

And what led us here, to this age of burnout, exhaustion, living in the swarm, in an era where Eros is in absolute agony, where love is disappearing to the margins?

Read some Byung-Chul Han. There's something in there for everybody, I swear.



Cordelia Barber is an outspoken Canadian-born citizen who has regularly volunteered and worked with political parties in Alberta and BC. Currently residing in Vancouver, she is beginning her career and will have her substack publishing about Canadian and world culture in 2026

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more