Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

USOFF TSAO: If recall campaigns gets used as a means for people to over turn an election, then it may be the beginning of the end for our democratic system

The following commentary references a story this morning (December 29th) from CBC News:  

Why this Independent MLA wants to make it easier for MLAs to be ousted by voters
 

Amelia Boultbee’s private member's bill seeks to lower the threshold for a successful recall...



To be fair, there needs to be a careful line drawn between voters who are unhappy with a MLA's genuine work, and voters whose choice for MLA lost, and who won't accept that the majority of voters didn't vote the same way they did. 

I've changed my opinions on recalls. It was one of the first things I asked Chief Election Officer Ms Campbell at the Thompson Nicola Regional District (TNRD) as I signed the paperwork as an election candidate; what are the processes of a recall if residents don't find me accountable so I can tell voters during election I am about accountability. I was told for the local order of government, there aren't any legislated recall processes and remember being disappointed.

But if recall campaigns gets used as a means for people to over turn an election after a victor has been decided, then it may be the beginning of the end for our democratic system.

When I lived and worked in China before 2008 (global financial crisis) and folks there looked up to those in the west, a supplier asked me over a meal "why do you think democracy works in the west?". 

I don't remember why, but my answer came out automatically to me; "It works because everyone agreed to play by the same set of rules". 

I gave examples where when Al Gore, George W Bush, Joe Lieberman, Sara Palin, John McCain, and others ran for an office and lost, and then  graciously accepted defeat and did not spend the next four years trying to undermine the victor of the election. 

I compared that to some democracies in Asia where people bicker constantly over politics more than governance. Where stunts like banana throwing and personal attacks on peers happen in the democratic governance system that never accepts defeat, and spends the next term trying to sink the ship that didn't let them be the captain of.

It seems that in the years that have followed, major western democracies are seeing people who no longer agree to the set of rules. 

If you lose, it doesn't mean you lost, it just means you keep fighting, and fighting, and fighting. And the victor no longer spends their time governing, but trying to fend off political attacks until the next election ... all to the detriment of the country.

One of the things I realized as we close in at the end of our BC local government term in office is that in politics there are no written rules; or very few of them. It is only as civil as the politicians choose to take it. 

Be "too civil" and you may get trampled and forever sidelined. Don't be civil and you create a political arms race where whoever can play the best games to out maneuver others gets to dictate other people's reputation and resources for their communities. 

The rules are written by us and we need to be very careful how some of us choose to rewrite them.

My hope is that MLA recalls don't become weaponized by people who lose an election, and then use it to deny residents of proper governance time by someone who won an election -- according to the rules we all agreed on.


Usoff Tsao is a Director for the Thompson Nicola Regional District (TNRD).  He represent Electoral Area "A" (Wells Gray Country

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more