Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

USOFF TSAO: If recall campaigns gets used as a means for people to over turn an election, then it may be the beginning of the end for our democratic system

The following commentary references a story this morning (December 29th) from CBC News:  

Why this Independent MLA wants to make it easier for MLAs to be ousted by voters
 

Amelia Boultbee’s private member's bill seeks to lower the threshold for a successful recall...



To be fair, there needs to be a careful line drawn between voters who are unhappy with a MLA's genuine work, and voters whose choice for MLA lost, and who won't accept that the majority of voters didn't vote the same way they did. 

I've changed my opinions on recalls. It was one of the first things I asked Chief Election Officer Ms Campbell at the Thompson Nicola Regional District (TNRD) as I signed the paperwork as an election candidate; what are the processes of a recall if residents don't find me accountable so I can tell voters during election I am about accountability. I was told for the local order of government, there aren't any legislated recall processes and remember being disappointed.

But if recall campaigns gets used as a means for people to over turn an election after a victor has been decided, then it may be the beginning of the end for our democratic system.

When I lived and worked in China before 2008 (global financial crisis) and folks there looked up to those in the west, a supplier asked me over a meal "why do you think democracy works in the west?". 

I don't remember why, but my answer came out automatically to me; "It works because everyone agreed to play by the same set of rules". 

I gave examples where when Al Gore, George W Bush, Joe Lieberman, Sara Palin, John McCain, and others ran for an office and lost, and then  graciously accepted defeat and did not spend the next four years trying to undermine the victor of the election. 

I compared that to some democracies in Asia where people bicker constantly over politics more than governance. Where stunts like banana throwing and personal attacks on peers happen in the democratic governance system that never accepts defeat, and spends the next term trying to sink the ship that didn't let them be the captain of.

It seems that in the years that have followed, major western democracies are seeing people who no longer agree to the set of rules. 

If you lose, it doesn't mean you lost, it just means you keep fighting, and fighting, and fighting. And the victor no longer spends their time governing, but trying to fend off political attacks until the next election ... all to the detriment of the country.

One of the things I realized as we close in at the end of our BC local government term in office is that in politics there are no written rules; or very few of them. It is only as civil as the politicians choose to take it. 

Be "too civil" and you may get trampled and forever sidelined. Don't be civil and you create a political arms race where whoever can play the best games to out maneuver others gets to dictate other people's reputation and resources for their communities. 

The rules are written by us and we need to be very careful how some of us choose to rewrite them.

My hope is that MLA recalls don't become weaponized by people who lose an election, and then use it to deny residents of proper governance time by someone who won an election -- according to the rules we all agreed on.


Usoff Tsao is a Director for the Thompson Nicola Regional District (TNRD).  He represent Electoral Area "A" (Wells Gray Country

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more