Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Pulling out a Thesaurus, to write a feel good media release, isn't going to accomplish that, and it's the people most in need who will continue to be left behind


This morning (August 3rd) BC Government News sent out a media release on Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.  The first paragraph of this release stated:

British Columbia and the Southern Dakelh Nation Alliance have signed a government-to-government agreement that establishes a new relationship based on respect and recognition of rights.

For far too many years there has been talk, and more talk, followed by more talk, about reconciliation, respect, and understanding.  It seems, sadly from an observers standpoint at least, that this is the path we still remain on.

With all-due-respect to First Nations people, some of whom have been friends and neighbours over many years -- especially in growing up in the Cariboo Chilcotin -- I would really like to know what was accomplished in the meetings with government, that led up to the signing of this agreement.  When I first read the announcement, something felt odd to me.  It took a minute or two, but then I realized it was because of the crafting of the release -- the actual grouping and series of words.   

After several more minutes of re-reading it a few times, I thought, "WOW, whomever put this together, must have spent an enormous amount of time using the Thesaurus."

What stood out for me?  It was these words:

... establishes a new relationship ... respect and recognition of rights ... building comprehensive reconciliation ... government-to-government relationship ... collaborative decision-making ... improving consultation ... working toward building strong relationships ... advancing reconciliation ... building relationships ... respect and recognition ...
... new ways of working, learning and collaborating ... building an enduring partnership ... collaborative work ... working together ... working with our neighbours and relatives ... good and healthy way ... bring about real change ... working together ... work as partners

Do we really, after all of these years of understanding there are wrongs to right ... responsibilities to acknowledge ... understanding that in order to grow to our full potential, each of us need to work on ourselves, and have the tools necessary to do that ... and acknowledge that while not forgetting the past, the future is ahead of us, and we need to create a path wide enough for all of us to get there

Pulling out a Thesaurus, to write a feel good media release, isn't going to accomplish that, and it's the people most in need who will continue to be left behind.  I say that because even now after years of talks, we continue to see far too many individuals plagued by self-doubt about themselves, which leads to addictions, self-harming, mental illness, and ultimately too many in jails and corrections centres.


I had a friend read this over before posting it, and they said to me:
I'm having trouble following your logic in this. I'm not sure what your point is. Is it that this government likes touchy-feely words with no substance (it does, by the way), or is it that not dealing with the issues in the First Nations community lead to societal problems?

I responded saying:
YES ... the repeated use, over too many years, of those touchy-feely words.  Not getting down to brass tacks and moving forward past just words! And Yes, that we (all of us) aren't dealing with the issues. Just more of the same all over again.




I had a heavy heart in writing this today, and so I hope that in reading this you did not have thoughts that I was being condemning or harsh.  I too have had my own issues with self-doubt and addictions, and it is not a place I wish to see anyone trapped.  Let's get past crafting the words I noted above into media releases ... let's move on to building up 'whole complete people', and creating the foundations needed for that to happen.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 3, 2018 at 1:49 PM

    Alan, If they don't help themselves why should we. case in point, the reserve in Kamloops has the best growing bottom land in the country and it is barely used except to raise some hay. I worked on the irrigation system for a hundred acres or so and when the department of Indian affairs and Northern development shut down forty five years ago It fell into disrepair. I trained a person to maintain the Pump and intake system but it became neglected and the pump burned out. There is a potential there for the band to make piles of money farming that land with vegetables. I worked for them for seven years, not just the Kamloops band. My area covered about one hundred square miles. It's never too late for them to take advantage of what they have. Dale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan ForsethAugust 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM

      If we can't support one another when it's needed, then who will be there for us when and if our need comes up in the future. I saw the same thing in the Chilcotin with irrigation systems, however the past is the past. So I ask, how do we move past platitudes such as I read in that government media release, and on to the real work that is required? You are right when you say there is 'potential for the band', let's work together to get there, or get out of their way so First Nations communities and individuals can get there.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more