Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Canada’s Financial Institution Structure Must Adapt to a Changing US Relationship


Rising geopolitical tensions may make it more challenging for Canadian authorities to repatriate foreign assets of financial institutions that have large international operations if any of them were ever to fail in the future, according to a new report by the C.D. Howe Institute. The report warns of this growing risk, especially given the very large operations some major banks have in the United States, and offers ideas on how to manage these risks.

In “Home Advantage: Helping Financial Institutions Prepare for Financial Distress Amidst Rising Geopolitical Tensions,” Mark Zelmer, Fellow-in-Residence at the C.D. Howe Institute and former Deputy Superintendent of Financial Institutions at the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), stresses the importance of encouraging Canadian financial institutions to keep more of their surplus capital and liquidity at home. 

Due to increased risks,  foreign authorities could potentially block, freeze, or ring-fence these assets for many years until they are satisfied that the claims of all of their local stakeholders have been addressed. This concern is heightened by the fact that, after four decades of expansion into the United States, operations at some banks now rival the size of their Canadian businesses in both assets and revenues.

The paper argues that the more that major Canadian financial institutions can be encouraged to keep the assets that back their surplus capital and liquidity on the books of the parent institutions here in Canada, the better-placed Canadian authorities would be to safeguard the interests of Canadian depositors and other creditors in any cross-border resolution operations involving those institutions.

“We need to reduce the leverage foreign regulators and courts could have over us if an internationally active Canadian financial institution were ever to face stress and require an orderly wind-down,” said Zelmer.

Zelmer recommends Canadian policymakers consider steps to encourage major banks and other internationally active financial institutions to invest more of the assets backing their surplus capital in Canada, while managing ring-fencing risks through targeted reforms. 

These include: enhancing disclosure by the six largest banks to allow greater market discipline over how recovery and resolution risks are managed; reviewing OSFI’s calibration of solo loss-absorbency requirements in light of recent geopolitical developments; and paying closer attention to the solo liquidity positions of major Canadian banks.

“Canada and its financial system need to adapt to a changing geopolitical environment,” concludes Zelmer. “It is better to act now in a thoughtful way while time is still on our side than to punt the issue until a crisis forces change.”

Read the Full Report

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more