Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RUSTAD: When courts overstep and undermine those democratic decisions, the notwithstanding clause is a legitimate tool to restore balance and accountability


John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, is speaking out in support of the right of provinces to use the notwithstanding clause when necessary to ensure that elected legislatures, not unelected judges, make key public policy decisions.

“British Columbians expect the laws passed by their elected representatives to reflect their values and priorities,” said Rustad. 

“When courts overstep and undermine those democratic decisions, the notwithstanding clause is a legitimate tool to restore balance and accountability. Policy choices should be made by those accountable to voters, not by unelected, unaccountable judges.”

Rustad emphasized that the clause is an essential safeguard in Canada’s Constitution, designed to protect provincial legislatures and the democratic process.

“The Liberals want to paint the notwithstanding clause as extreme, but the reality is simple: it was built into our system for a reason,” Rustad continued. 

“We will always defend the right of provincial governments to use it responsibly when the will of the people is at stake.”

Rustad pointed to growing concern across Canada that judicial activism is undermining the authority of legislatures. He underscored that Conservatives believe the people of British Columbia, through their elected representatives,  must have the final say on laws that impact their lives.

“Democracy means accountability,” Rustad concluded. “The notwithstanding clause is one of the tools that ensures it.”

Rustad also noted that Premier David Eby has remained silent on this constitutional crisis. 

“British Columbians deserve leadership from their Premier when the balance of power between legislatures and the courts is at stake,” said Rustad. 

“By refusing to weigh in, Mr. Eby is failing to stand up for the democratic rights of this province.”  

Comments

  1. The clause is a functional part of our Constitution so it should not be disparaged. Funny why it needs to be defended. Ahhh .. lefties don’t like accountability.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more