Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

For Avi Lewis mainstream disdain is a feature, not a bug (Means & Ways)


If you are an NDP partisan, you have to look very deeply into the entrails of the mortal shellacking the NDP took at the polls this spring for signs of hope.

The party suffered its worst-ever federal defeat, winning just seven seats. It lost official party status in the House of Commons and with it crucial funding, committee seats and parliamentary relevance. Fewer than 50 of the NDP candidates received the 10 per cent of the vote required in their ridings to get millions of dollars in campaign expenses reimbursed by Elections Canada.

So disenchanted are the tattered remnants of the NDP grassroots with the direction of the party that a group called Reclaim NDP has started a campaign that encourages supporters not to send donations to the party HQ.

On the bright side, they are no longer weighed down by a deeply unpopular leader. That’s about it. Jagmeet Singh is gone. That’s pretty much the bright side. But that’s not nothing. Just ask the Liberals. They rebounded from their worst-ever showing in 2011 by selecting Justin Trudeau as leader in 2013; followed by a majority election win in 2015.

Better yet, the bar for political success has always been much lower for the NDP, for whom moral victories and third-place finishes have historically earned their leaders long, warmly remembered tenures at the party helm. 

Warmed over Jagmeet Singh?

A replacement for Singh will be chosen in March 2026. So far, there is one declared contender: Avi Lewis, who has name recognition and an audience among progressive left voters as a TV show host, documentarian, activist and lecturer. The son of Stephen Lewis and grandson of David Lewis, he seems to be borrowing a page from Justin Trudeau’s playbook in that he could be the next in line from a family of NDP royalty. Lewis has also shown commitment to the party, having run, albeit unsuccessfully, as a federal candidate in the 2021 and 2025 elections.

Lewis’ media skills were on full display with the polished video that launched his campaign. He struck some of the greatest hits of the NDP populist left playbook, attacking Canadian economic oligopolies in cell phones, groceries, energy and banking as the source of all of Canada’s economic problems. And he duly lumped the Conservatives and the Liberals together as the lap dogs of the Canadian plutocracy.

If this all sounds familiar to you, that’s because it is the same themes that Singh was hitting throughout his tenure as leader, with the resultant political wreckage that is the NDP of today. And this gets to the heart of the fundamental problem that the party faces as it starts to rebuild: its persistent failure over time to connect with its progressive base.

True, Singh’s decision to join the Liberals in the Supply and Confidence Agreement in the last Parliament became an anchor on the party’s fortunes as Trudeau became ever more unpopular. But the fact that the NDP vote migrated both to the right, to the Conservatives, and to the centre to the Liberals in 2025, meant it no longer had a unique political value proposition when Trudeau departed the scene.

Mainstream disdain is the point

Apart from his commitment to bringing the greedy rich to heel, Lewis trumpeted what he called a “Green New Deal” as the core of his economic policy. If this also sounds familiar, that's because progressives in the U.S. Democratic Party called by name for the very same thing, a set of policies that Donald Trump and the Republicans successfully portrayed as economically catastrophic.

What’s interesting about this is that Lewis chose not to refer to the “Leap Manifesto,” a progressive prescription for “energy democracy,” which he co-authored in 2025 with his partner and fellow high-profile activist Naomi Klein. It was in essence, based on the proposition that Canada could harness the transition from fossil fuels to, among other things, create jobs, reduce income inequality and tackle the climate crisis. Like its U.S. inspiration, the Manifesto was dismissed by most economists and pundits as a recipe for economic disaster.

Regardless of the economic demerits of either the Leap Manifesto or the Green New Deal — and there are many — Lewis as leader would be able to point to a unique political value proposition, recognizably progressive and, more importantly, exclusively NDP. He could use this as a club to beat both the Liberals and the Conservatives as their economic agendas have converged under Prime Minister Mark Carney.

But I am getting ahead of myself. There are three other potential contenders who may enter the NDP leadership campaign: NDP MP Heather McPherson, International Longshore and Warehouse Union president Rob Ashton and activist Yves Engler. Like Trudeau when he ran for Liberal leader in 2013, Lewis has an enormous head start over them in terms of name recognition and family heritage among the party faithful. The Green New Deal gives him a policy agenda that will warm progressive hearts.

Apart from what he might say publicly, Lewis will not be running to win government should he be chosen NDP leader, he will be running to win back official party status in the House of Commons and a place as an authentic voice for Canadian progressivism. In this context, mainstream denunciation is a feature for Lewis, not a bug. In the meantime, expect the populist octane of the NDP leadership race to accelerate as Lewis and his presumed opponents outbid one another to show who is the furthest to the left.

Ken Polk is a public affairs counsellor at Compass Rose. Previously, Ken served as chief speechwriter, deputy director of communications and legislative assistant to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more