Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: I did not see that coming ... Rustad kicks out Sturko


I've followed, studied, and commented on politics for decades. I've been at this a very long time. I'm rarely surprised.

Elenore Sturko was one of the MLAs in the BC Conservative caucus that tried to bridge the socially moderate BC Liberal wing of the party to the more fiscally conservative BC Conservative wing of the party. She was and still is an outspoken MLA and here's the thing: she's almost always right. She gives the party a very good public image.

Yesterday party leader John Rustad won his leadership review with just over 70% support. Normally a leader wants 70% as a bare minimum with an eye to for 80%. But 70% will suffice.

You may remember a couple of weeks ago when the Ontario Liberal leader resigned after receiving around 65% of the vote in her leadership review.

Rustad came off that win and then kicked Sturko out of caucus. This was a unilateral decision by him. He claimed she as trying to undermine his leadership.

Why is this so surprising?

Well it is surprising because Rustad just had a big public win. His leadership was secure. He did not need to go after anyone and rock the boat. In fact, focusing on the NDP with his caucus behind him would have looked like a party that had its proverbial crap together.

Instead, he acted rather petty and now looks like a vindictive small man in public going after his perceived enemies rather than a big man taking the high road.

He acted like Donald Trump when he could have acted like Brian Mulroney or Jean Chretien. The latter two made their leadership rivals their top ministers. Both Michael Wilson and Paul Martin were made the Finance Ministers under Mulroney and Chretien respectively. That served to unify their parties under their leadership with their rivals given top spots in cabinet.

Rustad should have elevated Sturko if she was the problem he says she was. That would have brought her closer into the fold and those that are looking to her would have followed.

I'm not saying anything new here. That's Parliamentary Politics 101. It is how diplomats build alliances. That is how you build a movement. You make the tent bigger. You don't make it smaller.

A long time lesson in Canadian politics is that you are okay to kick out extremists but you never, ever kick out a moderate.

This is a huge misstep by John Rustad. He's done some real damage to this public profile and I don't think he can fix this one.
 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more