Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH – We’re looking at least another three years for vehicles to start rolling across a new replacement Red Bridge

The province is conducting a lengthy planning and design process ~~ AI

 The Ministry of Transportation issued a request for qualifications (RFQ) Monday (Dec. 19) to “guide transportation planning options” in partnership with the City of Kamloops and Tkemlúps te Secwépemc following the loss of the 88-year-old bridge ~~ CFJC Today December 12, 2024

NINE MONTH LATER (September 18, 2025) a BC Government media release states, ‘A planning process is underway to explore options for reconnecting Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc lands and Kamloops’


ONE YEAR AGO, on Thursday September 19th, an arsonist(s) set fire to, and destroyed, the Red Bridge in Kamloops. It was the second time as an earlier attempt, two days previous, had failed to do the job.

Twelve months after the Red Bridge was deliberately destroyed, Kamloops residents are still left wondering when they’ll be able to once drive, from River Street, across the South Thompson River to access the Mount Paul Industrial area.

After all, how much planning, engineering, measuring does it take to span a couple hundred feet across the South Thompson River, where a bridge had already been located?

As far as they’ve managed to get is to once again re-announce the planning process is underway, and as yesterdays media release indicated, ‘The preferred options from the planning process are expected to be shared with the public in spring 2026.’

This Spring?  Now we’re up to eighteen (18) months – and still NO bridge!

How does that fit with the Ministry of Transportation and Transit assuring us that they, ‘... remain committed to advancing the planning process as quickly as possible ...’ 

Just think; once the ‘conceptual design for a modern replacement bridge on the original alignment’ is presented, the government is going to have to issue a Request For Proposals (RFP) so that construction companies can bid on the project.  From there, how many more months will it take to choose the winning bid?

But still, we won’t have a bridge.

Materials will have to be lined up for the new structure ... crews lined up to build it ... and then, from what I’ve heard, the construction phase will take at least two years.

So ... we’re looking at least another three years for vehicles to start rolling across a new replacement Red Bridge.

Anyone care to guess what happens in three (3) years?  

In 2008, after BC Interior residents had conducted a concerted campaign to have tolls removed on the Coquihalla Highway, Premier Gordon Campbell and Finance Minister Kevin Falcon ‘went behind the controls of a bulldozer to kick off demolition of the toll booths’ (CBC), ending years of tolls. Months later an election was called for 2009.

Looks like we’ll be holding the provinces 44th General Election (in 2028), just in time for NDP Premier David Eby (if he’s still around) to have a grand opening ribbon cutting to finally open a new bridge.  Maybe we’ll even have a spectacle with him in a hard hat and hi-rez vest, with a pneumatic or hydraulic wrench in hand, putting in the last bolt before driving across in a Ministry of Transportation dump truck.

All I can say is, this is taking a hell of a long time.  

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more