Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN TWIGG -- Federal Tory coalition has many questions waiting to be answered


The fragility of a 'big tent' conservative party (There is a long history of right-wing parties splintering and merging in Canada)
CBC News ~~ Duane Bratt & Bruce Foster ~~ July 25th

This is a well-researched article, and well-reasoned around the various versions of Conservative and other right-side party mergers, coalitions and shotgun marriages to fight a common partisan political enemy. Or two.

But what does that mean for the current paradigm in the looming Canadian federal election?


It would seem that the Andrew Scheer-led Conservative Party of Canada has been doing quite well at forming local coalitions against left-side incumbents (judging from their candidate nominations), and Scheer and his advisers also have been doing well to position themselves as electable such as by producing a passable policy on climate change (even though the supposed climate crisis is bogus, the preponderance of people believing it's real must be assuaged). 

They have been assembling a fairly wide-ranging platform that so far has avoided angering large swaths of voters as well as not giving the Liberal backroomers some easy targets for policy barbs (such as on say abortion or gay rights).  On the other hand, the election is still about 90 days away so we can expect the Liberals will be launching lots of pointed barbs at Scheer and the Tories closer to voting day.

And that's where coalition-building becomes so important: for the Scheer Conservatives to win they will need a team, and a platform, strong enough to hold together when the caboose goes around a corner at high speed.

Can the Scheer team build a platform with enough appealing planks in it to keep most supporters aboard even when the going gets rocky? And the Liberal strategists surely will be rattling every cage, pounding every door and flooding their already-captive mainstream media with propaganda designed to derail Scheer's shaky coalition.

It remains to be seen how the campaigning will play out, and the war of issues managers takes place, perhaps spiced up by Warren Kinsella shooting barbs for the federal Green Party.

And what will happen in vote-rich Quebec?

Scheer's French is reasonably fluent, especially for a guy from Regina, but will he also have a strong enough Quebec lieutenant to attract some extra votes from Quebec's notoriously self-serving voters?

Will the Jagmeet Singh New Democrats be a force?

Likely not, which means some usual left-side voters will be migrating to the Trudeau Liberals, making Scheer's climb even steeper - unless he suddenly rediscovers his party's Red Tory roots and adds a few planks to try to pull in a few migrant votes from the centre-left (pun intended insofar as illegal border-crossing may be a mixed issue for several parties).

Maxime Bernier, leader of the People Party of Canada
And then there is Maxime Bernier's fledgling Peoples Party of Canada, which may prove to be merely a puny vanity project, or it could step up a notch and become a crucial vote-splitter in a dozen or so swing ridings.

The gist of the article (The fragility of a ‘big tent’ conservative party) is that Canada has had a long history of Conservative and right-side movements splintering at the starting gate, and rarely running together, and in 2019 we seem to be seeing a re-run of that.

It hearkens back to the formation of the Reform Party of Canada, which brought together populist western alienation forces (which included quite a few progressive activists) but inevitably became dominated by the blue-Tory social-conservative clique of and around Preston Manning which never did form a bond with a national mentality from all regions.

Should Scheer go after Bernier or pretend he doesn't exist?

Good question. We'll soon see.

If Scheer can paint the Justin Trudeau Liberals as a disastrous incompetent cabal needing to be urgently evicted, then yes he could form a majority, especially with the left-side movements so splintered.  But if the right-side splinters too then we could get a dysfunctional minority like those pizza parliaments seen often or late in Europe, which is a slippery slope to bad government.

What should Scheer do?

Strategize very carefully about what is needed to build a big strong tent well able to withstand the political winds sure to come, and big enough to welcome in a wide range of differing views.

What issues should his platform feature? That's a topic for another day but meanwhile he'd be wise to ask his pollsters this question:

What mix of which issues do I need to pull in about 40% of the popular vote in about two-thirds of Canada's constituencies?”

Should I be wet or dry on the climate? Should we tax the rich a bit more, or ease back on balancing the budget in the short term? And which ridings should I focus on to win at least half of the seats? (recalling Donald Trump's focus on electoral college votes).

Ah yes, Canadian politics - a blood sport lots of folks enjoy watching, but also this: how many people will turn out to vote and why or why not?

As always, pulling out the supporters to vote on E-Day (and in advance polls) can make a critical difference.

Comments

  1. 1. Your position on climate change essentially amounts to this. A vast conspiracy comprised of 97% of the world's climate scientists seek to implement a massive hoax only to be thwarted by a plucky band of billionaires and oil companies. I do agree with you that Scheer is only paying climate change lip service and offers nothing of consequence.
    2. Andrew Scheer was born and raised in bi-lingual Ottawa. He is not from Regina.
    3. Tell me more about Mr. Scheer's long and storied experience in the private sector. I've heard a nasty rumour that it is comprised solely of a six month stint selling insurance. That isn't true is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not replying on behalf of John, however I would like to point out that the "97% of scientists agree" on global warming has been much debated since 2013 ... including this from the Washington Post: 97 percent of scientific papers (that take a stance on the issue) agree, the study finds. Among the general population I do not believe there is much debate there isn't global warming, but simply there is much discussion on to what degree it is happening, as well as how and why.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Tourists Rack Up $200M in Unpaid Health Bills While BC Patients Wait Years for Care

While British Columbians wait years for basic medical care, the NDP government has allowed non-residents to rack up $200.6 million in unpaid health bills since 2020-2021. New research from SecondStreet.org, obtained through a freedom of information request, revealed that people from outside Canada are coming to BC, receiving health services, and leaving without paying their bills.  The losses span every health region in the province. "British Columbians are not guaranteed timely access to healthcare, be it treatment or diagnostics, and this situation continues to deteriorate under the NDP," said Anna Kindy, MLA for North Island and Critic for Health. "Taxpayers are footing the bill for tourists' health treatments to the tune of over $200 million, enough to cover over 21,000 hip replacements in this province while British Columbians wait months to years for that surgery.” The research found BC has the worst record of any province in Canada examined so far. Under a dec...

NDP Finance Minister Given "F" on Report Card by Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Peter Milobar, MLA for Kamloops Centres and Official Opposition Finance Critic, released the following statement in response to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation's 2026 Finance Minister Report Card, which ranked BC Finance Minister Brenda Bailey dead last among provincial finance ministers in Canada with an overall grade of "F":  "British Columbians didn't need a report card to know things are headed in the wrong direction. They see it every time they pay their bills, try to buy a home, or watch another government deficit pile up. But now an independent national organization has confirmed that NDP Brenda Bailey is the worst-rated finance minister in Canada. "After nearly a decade of decline under this NDP government, British Columbia has become a province where people pay more, government borrows more, and families get less in return. We have some of the highest debt in the country, repeated credit downgrades, and no credible plan to get our finances back on...

Labels

Show more