Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN TWIGG -- Federal Tory coalition has many questions waiting to be answered


The fragility of a 'big tent' conservative party (There is a long history of right-wing parties splintering and merging in Canada)
CBC News ~~ Duane Bratt & Bruce Foster ~~ July 25th

This is a well-researched article, and well-reasoned around the various versions of Conservative and other right-side party mergers, coalitions and shotgun marriages to fight a common partisan political enemy. Or two.

But what does that mean for the current paradigm in the looming Canadian federal election?


It would seem that the Andrew Scheer-led Conservative Party of Canada has been doing quite well at forming local coalitions against left-side incumbents (judging from their candidate nominations), and Scheer and his advisers also have been doing well to position themselves as electable such as by producing a passable policy on climate change (even though the supposed climate crisis is bogus, the preponderance of people believing it's real must be assuaged). 

They have been assembling a fairly wide-ranging platform that so far has avoided angering large swaths of voters as well as not giving the Liberal backroomers some easy targets for policy barbs (such as on say abortion or gay rights).  On the other hand, the election is still about 90 days away so we can expect the Liberals will be launching lots of pointed barbs at Scheer and the Tories closer to voting day.

And that's where coalition-building becomes so important: for the Scheer Conservatives to win they will need a team, and a platform, strong enough to hold together when the caboose goes around a corner at high speed.

Can the Scheer team build a platform with enough appealing planks in it to keep most supporters aboard even when the going gets rocky? And the Liberal strategists surely will be rattling every cage, pounding every door and flooding their already-captive mainstream media with propaganda designed to derail Scheer's shaky coalition.

It remains to be seen how the campaigning will play out, and the war of issues managers takes place, perhaps spiced up by Warren Kinsella shooting barbs for the federal Green Party.

And what will happen in vote-rich Quebec?

Scheer's French is reasonably fluent, especially for a guy from Regina, but will he also have a strong enough Quebec lieutenant to attract some extra votes from Quebec's notoriously self-serving voters?

Will the Jagmeet Singh New Democrats be a force?

Likely not, which means some usual left-side voters will be migrating to the Trudeau Liberals, making Scheer's climb even steeper - unless he suddenly rediscovers his party's Red Tory roots and adds a few planks to try to pull in a few migrant votes from the centre-left (pun intended insofar as illegal border-crossing may be a mixed issue for several parties).

Maxime Bernier, leader of the People Party of Canada
And then there is Maxime Bernier's fledgling Peoples Party of Canada, which may prove to be merely a puny vanity project, or it could step up a notch and become a crucial vote-splitter in a dozen or so swing ridings.

The gist of the article (The fragility of a ‘big tent’ conservative party) is that Canada has had a long history of Conservative and right-side movements splintering at the starting gate, and rarely running together, and in 2019 we seem to be seeing a re-run of that.

It hearkens back to the formation of the Reform Party of Canada, which brought together populist western alienation forces (which included quite a few progressive activists) but inevitably became dominated by the blue-Tory social-conservative clique of and around Preston Manning which never did form a bond with a national mentality from all regions.

Should Scheer go after Bernier or pretend he doesn't exist?

Good question. We'll soon see.

If Scheer can paint the Justin Trudeau Liberals as a disastrous incompetent cabal needing to be urgently evicted, then yes he could form a majority, especially with the left-side movements so splintered.  But if the right-side splinters too then we could get a dysfunctional minority like those pizza parliaments seen often or late in Europe, which is a slippery slope to bad government.

What should Scheer do?

Strategize very carefully about what is needed to build a big strong tent well able to withstand the political winds sure to come, and big enough to welcome in a wide range of differing views.

What issues should his platform feature? That's a topic for another day but meanwhile he'd be wise to ask his pollsters this question:

What mix of which issues do I need to pull in about 40% of the popular vote in about two-thirds of Canada's constituencies?”

Should I be wet or dry on the climate? Should we tax the rich a bit more, or ease back on balancing the budget in the short term? And which ridings should I focus on to win at least half of the seats? (recalling Donald Trump's focus on electoral college votes).

Ah yes, Canadian politics - a blood sport lots of folks enjoy watching, but also this: how many people will turn out to vote and why or why not?

As always, pulling out the supporters to vote on E-Day (and in advance polls) can make a critical difference.

Comments

  1. 1. Your position on climate change essentially amounts to this. A vast conspiracy comprised of 97% of the world's climate scientists seek to implement a massive hoax only to be thwarted by a plucky band of billionaires and oil companies. I do agree with you that Scheer is only paying climate change lip service and offers nothing of consequence.
    2. Andrew Scheer was born and raised in bi-lingual Ottawa. He is not from Regina.
    3. Tell me more about Mr. Scheer's long and storied experience in the private sector. I've heard a nasty rumour that it is comprised solely of a six month stint selling insurance. That isn't true is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not replying on behalf of John, however I would like to point out that the "97% of scientists agree" on global warming has been much debated since 2013 ... including this from the Washington Post: 97 percent of scientific papers (that take a stance on the issue) agree, the study finds. Among the general population I do not believe there is much debate there isn't global warming, but simply there is much discussion on to what degree it is happening, as well as how and why.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more