Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Furstenau and Olsen -- The brain is part of the body – let’s include it in our health-care system

 

We have been asking questions of the provincial government about their response to the growing mental health crisis in British Columbia.

 

Every one of their responses have been framed with sincere condolences. Yet, urgent action is lacking. We have heard from numerous community advocates that the provincial programs to deliver a safe supply of pharmaceutical-grade alternatives to poisonous illicit street drugs are not enough. We have heard that the province has not moved quickly enough to decriminalize people who possess a personal supply of illicit street drugs.

 

For too long our friends, family and neighbours who struggle with mental health and addictions have faced relentless stigmatization and judgment instead of receiving the support and care they deserve. There are far too many stories of how our fellow citizens have been forced to overcome obstacles deeply entrenched in government institutions.

 

Rather than receiving the medical treatment they need, people suffering from addictions have been arrested and sent to the criminal justice system. Rather than receiving the medical treatment they need, people suffering from a mental health crisis have been belittled and sent on their way without the support or treatment they are seeking.

 

Discriminating against people suffering from addictions and mental health crises by labeling them as criminals and less-than-worthy of treatment is rooted in a culture of stigmatization that is informed by a bias across government institutions.

 

People are dying in British Columbia because of outdated drug policy. People are dying in British Columbia because when they seek treatment for a mental health crisis, they cannot get the help they need.

 

It doesn’t have to be this way.

 

One big step government can take towards providing specialized mental health care for British Columbians is to pursue a pilot project authorizing psychologists to become eligible providers through the Medical Service Plan or Psychological Services Plan. This would help expand the access and affordability of mental health services and ensure all British Columbians can access the health care they require.

 

The BC NDP government has not demonstrated the urgency that is needed to address these crises. When we ask questions, we often receive lists of piecemeal actions being taken related to mental health. Though many of them are great – more treatment beds and online supports, for example – they do not address the broader, systemic problem at hand.

 

Our government does not treat mental and physical ailments equitably.

 

If you are experiencing a cardiac event, stroke, or even diagnosed with terminal cancer it is unlikely that you will be diminished or blamed for your condition. In fact, you are likely to receive world-class treatment from the British Columbia health care system. However, we have heard too many examples that are far from this response from people who present to a health-care facility with a mental health crisis and/or addiction.

 

We asked Premier John Horgan in question period when his government is going to change the culture in our health-care system so British Columbians can expect the same treatment when they present with ailments of the mind or the body.

 

Unfortunately, there was no answer, but we think everyone can agree that the situation is dire and getting worse. If we are to ‘build back better’ after the pandemic, truly caring for British Columbians’ mental well-being will need to be at the forefront of that effort.

 

 

Sonia Furstenau is the leader of the BC Green Party and MLA for Cowichan Valley. Adam Olsen is the Green Party MLA for Saanich North and the Islands.

Comments

  1. Sonia and Adam, please advocate for an interim solution whereby the government stops playing whack-a-mole with mental health funding, giving money to agencies focused on specific needs such as counselling for sex workers or for Salt Spring Island instead of the three layers of mental health treatment and support they should be supporting. We need adequate emergency room funding so that those in crisis are not released two hours after they are brought in by ambulance for suicidality. We need adequate hospital funding so that in-patient and out-patient treatment to adjust meds and treat mental health crises are available to those that need it. And we need adequate funding for non-profit community counselling agencies that are the third layer of adequate protection. Instead, this government has joined previous governments in providing inadequate funding for hospitals, and money lobbied for by community counselling to expand capacity was instead given to agencies that focus on a narrow community of interest.

    Island Integrated Counselling has repeatedly been turned down for funding because there is no accountability for how the available money has been allocated. We are the largest non-profit counselling agency in BC, and yet there is only $40,000 in Gaming Fund funding to support our 20 counsellors operating out of four locations on Vancouver Island to offer affordable counselling. Sex workers in Victoria and Vancouver each received $120,000 for their counselling needs, while we, while serving all of Vancouver Island out of four locations, got nothing.

    We need advocates who recognize that if we are prevented from providing the services that are needed, there will be no one able to do so.

    You can contact the Executive Director of Island Integrated Counselling on his direct number at 250-954-7150, or e-mail him at earl@islandintegratedcounselling.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more